BilliardsBall
Veteran Member
That seems like it goes against all evidence and dating methods we have discovered over the past 200 years. Can you back up the claim in bold? I ask because I have looked and I haven't seen anything, but I'd like to check them out. Not that peer reviewed articles magically grant a hypothesis legitimacy, as there are no authorities in science. But it sounds interesting. Thanks.
How is it that I can find lists of 60 up to 200 scientific anomalies online but you cannot? For example, even Carl Sagan noted the "faint Sun paradox" decades ago, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faint_young_Sun_paradox, and I've seen some lovely, in-depth articles showing how the Sun could be thousands, let alone billions of years old.
Thank you!