Dirty Penguin
Master Of Ceremony
Spot on. Try being a white middle-aged Christian business owner in New York. Governor Cuomo wan's neither me nor the Pope to live here.
Evidence..?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Spot on. Try being a white middle-aged Christian business owner in New York. Governor Cuomo wan's neither me nor the Pope to live here.
Young women are completely in control of when they can become parents without any say so from the government or anyone else for that matter except in the case of rape.
ok,what's this prove?
GOP: Autism is god's wrath on America
ok,what's this prove?
ok,what's this prove?
Please define "goggle-eyed," and "lunatic" and why this person meet that definition.You asked for an example of a google-eyed lunatic...so I gave you an example of a google-eyed lunatic.
"Are they these extreme conservatives who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if thats who they are and theyre the extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York, because thats not who New Yorkers are." -Andrew CuomoEvidence..?
I miss the point. Try using small one or two syllable words and simple sentences for me, I am a narrow-minded Biblist after all.There's actually been an uptick in anti-abortion restrictions. Many of them are a carbon copy produced by (American Right To Life). This is pretty much all they do....is right legislation so all the supposed law makers have to do is fill in the blanks and pass it.
File:Guttmacher Abortion Restrictions.SVG - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So about the time when the tea party were making gains in the states and in the House is where we see the most anti-abortion measures being passed....So much for "Small Government"....ehh...???
Please define "goggle-eyed," and "lunatic" and why this person meet that definition.
Since he hasn't answered you, I will. He's implying (without saying...to preserve the weasel option, you know) that correlation is causation between more abortion restrictions & the rise of the Tea Party. Therefore Tea Partiers are pro-big-gov, despite their claimed agenda otherwise. This is good technique for when criticizing a group for what they believe isn't so effective (especially when the group is diverse)....assign them a more easily attacked agenda. How do I know he thought this? I read the thought bubble over his beak.I miss the point. Try using small one or two syllable words and simple sentences for me, I am a narrow-minded Biblist after all.
And yet it has nothing to do with my statement that brought the response.Since he hasn't answered you, I will. He's implying (without saying...to preserve the weasel option, you know) that correlation is causation between more abortion restrictions & the rise of the Tea Party. Therefore Tea Partiers are pro-big-gov, despite their claimed agenda otherwise. This is good technique for when criticizing a group for what they believe isn't so effective (especially when the group is diverse)....assign them a more easily attacked agenda. How do I know he thought this? I read the thought bubble over his beak.
Hmmm......the abortion restrictions also correlate with Obama's becoming prez. That must be a cause too!
Btw, watch out for imposters....
Yet no has defined either goggle-eyed or lunatic yet the term seems to be used for people who perhaps got caught at a bad moment photographically. Now if I were to use a photograph of some who I thought was goggle-eyed I'd use this one:You are serious, aren't you?
I almost envy you. It takes some chutzpah.
Well, one thing is certain, that "goggle-eyed lunatic" in the op isn't.Just out of interest, what stated policies do the major parties (or even the minor ones) have which directly impact autism, related illnesses, and the provision of care, etc?
I've done some quick googling, and seems like there is some limited mention of autism by both parties.
I'm trying to understand what is actually party-endorsed.
Just out of interest, what stated policies do the major parties (or even the minor ones) have which directly impact autism, related illnesses, and the provision of care, etc?
I've done some quick googling, and seems like there is some limited mention of autism by both parties.
I'm trying to understand what is actually party-endorsed.
Yet no has defined either goggle-eyed or lunatic yet
Yes, I apologize...I missed it or I most certainly would have read it looking intently for a definition that is not clear that the title "goggle-eyed lunatic assessment tool" does not imply is there.Yes I did. I gave you a very convenient goggle eyed lunatic assessment tool that you can print off for reference and safekeeping. I spent several valuable minutes on that post, just for you. Are you telling me you didn't even read it???
Since he hasn't answered you, I will. He's implying (without saying...to preserve the weasel option, you know) that correlation is causation between more abortion restrictions & the rise of the Tea Party. Therefore Tea Partiers are pro-big-gov, despite their claimed agenda otherwise. This is good technique for when criticizing a group for what they believe isn't so effective (especially when the group is diverse)....assign them a more easily attacked agenda. How do I know he thought this? I read the thought bubble over his beak.
Hmmm......the abortion restrictions also correlate with Obama's becoming prez. That must be a cause too!
Btw, watch out for imposters....
Sounds good to me. Maybe I'll send a donation.Tea Party: "We hate big government."
Tea Party: "The government should regulate who can and cannot get married."
Tea Party: "The government should regulate what women can and can't do with their bodies."
Tea Party: "The government should regulate what drugs we can and cannot do."