Just because they have access to all they need doesn't mean they are hoarding to the point that other's can't have what they need.This means little when any needs they have are easily fulfilled by the partial sale of enormous assets in my view.
No; you made the claim that the rich are hogging up the limited amount of money to the point that there is little left for everyone else. I'm making the point that they don't have most of the moneySo you are using a semantic definition of little to misinform.
How? How does Gates starting Microsoft, or Musk starting Tesla or others prevent you from owning a house?Why would it be with only one of them? Both add to my inability to pay of a house in my lifetime by myself.