Darkforbid
Well-Known Member
No.
Scientists observed phenomena. They called them Dark Matter and Dark Energy.
No assumption.
No, Scientists observed phenomena. And postulate dark matter/energy is the most likely cause
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No.
Scientists observed phenomena. They called them Dark Matter and Dark Energy.
No assumption.
so if we run into each at the speed of light
that applied force would not be 2C?
collider event?
it is not a question of unbelieving, it is a question that your scientific knowledge needs an upgrade double quick. Especially, if you need it to justify your metaphysics.
This is a bunch of relativistic nonsense from mind confused "scientists".
"Gravity" as a commonly understood concept, cannot be universally explained at all.
"Time" does not exist as an universal concept.
"Space" does not hold the concept of curvation as an embedded quality.
These issues are all highly speculative ghosts in cosmological minds.
Someone had to be First
you are simply denying....He wasn't there in the beginning
THAT implies your spirit is only a product of substance
and you are soon to be dust
not much point in generation 7billion copies of a learning device
only to have all those numbers crumble
Almighty
that is the only name I use to Him
And you're angering Amun-Ra every time you do that.....The only name I use to Him is Odin.
oooops.....the science documentary I saw was contrary to thatNo.
Scientists observed phenomena. They called them Dark Matter and Dark Energy.
No assumption.
Odin?.....as Creator?The only name I use to Him is Odin.
NEW TOPIC....!!!!And you're angering Amun-Ra every time you do that.....
I post the remark.....as my ownIMO this perception is a mental result of the Abrahamic religion heritage. Several other ancient religions states everything in the Universe to be an eternal stage of formation/creation/dissolution and recreation/re-formation, which of course discards the very idea of a beginning, included a Big Bang.
BRAVO!!!With another sentence: "Everything is connected and entangled" - Even native tribe cultures knew that and to a large extend, they also knew HOW and WHY = a causality.
Further on:
It is very common and normal for modern educated scientists and laymen to state such a denial.
Quote from - Causality - Wikipedia
“Causality is an abstraction that indicates how the world progresses, so basic a concept that it is more apt as an explanation of other concepts of progression than as something to be explained by others more basic. The concept is like those of agency and efficacy. For this reason, a leap of intuition may be needed to grasp it”.
Yes but "intuition" and "natural philosophy" isn´t learned in scientific physics, which is why all kinds of "cosmological statements" are full of dogmas which aren´t explained:
"Everything in the Universe is formed from nothing in the Big Bang".
"The Universe is suddenly increasing the velocity of the expansion".
"Dark energy" is added in order to confirm this dogma.
"The Solar System is formed from a cosmic cloud which suddenly decided to collapse in it self".
"Dark matter is inserted in galaxies just to confirm the gravity dogmas".
- And so on and so on . . . No natural and logical causal explanations, bul loads of assumptions on what´s going on. And if the assumptions fails, more dark this and that are just added into the falied assumptions.
Again:
"Quote from - Causality - Wikipedia
“Causality is an abstraction that indicates how the world progresses, so basic a concept that it is more apt as an explanation of other concepts of progression than as something to be explained by others more basic. The concept is like those of agency and efficacy. For this reason, a leap of intuition may be needed to grasp it”.
That is: In order to be able explain causal cosmological conditions, INTUITION and PHILOSOPHICAL THINKING is needed in order to grasp causal conditions and THEN describe and underpin these causal facts with modern scientific methods.
And yet, all satellites have to be constantly corrected in order to work because there are no such things as "cosmological constants" anywhere in the Universe.And yet GPS, which incorporate these ideas, works.
You may have understood that wrong. They can not be seen as they don't interact with light. They can be detected through their gravitational influence.the aforementioned items cannot be detected
hmmmm…..fine line thereYou may have understood that wrong. They can not be seen as they don't interact with light. They can be detected through their gravitational influence.
If you assume the universe been created and you call that creative force "god" (and don't add additional attributes) then the comparison works.hmmmm…..fine line there
like saying.....I know there is God
the creation is the evidence
TurtlesOdin?.....as Creator?
NEW TOPIC...!!!!!
like saying.....I know there is Odinlike saying.....I know there is God
the creation is the evidence
if you prefer the name Odin.....to Almightylike saying.....I know there is Odin
the creation is the evidence