Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
GOOD!!!
I hate questions with built in false assumptions. Do you know how often I have gotten in trouble for using that against creationists even when I make it clear that it is not an accusation against them? They skip the explanation, go right to the question and assume that I am attacking them when I am trying to explain the sort of question that they asked. Hmmm, perhaps they get angry because for them it is not a false accusation. Nah, I won't go that far. I doubt if most creationists are wife beaters.The questioning was loaded with problems.
Congress critters were conflating advocacy
for Palestinians with destroying Israel.
Have you stopped beating your wife?
If you cannot say a clear "Yes!", you
should be fired & prosecuted.
I must have missed that announcement, got a link?No one asked if Israelis are guilty of hate speech for calling for the extermination of Palestinians because criticizing that would be anti-Semitism
Their anger stems from insecurityI hate questions with built in false assumptions. Do you know how often I have gotten in trouble for using that against creationists even when I make it clear that it is not an accusation against them? They skip the explanation, go right to the question and assume that I am attacking them when I am trying to explain the sort of question that they asked. Hmmm, perhaps they get angry because for them it is not a false accusation. Nah, I won't go that far. I doubt if most creationists are wife beaters.
Problem is people are forced to thread a politically correct line.You cannot debate or engage with them.IMO she should have been fired, because I can guarantee you if the question was about calling for the lynching of black people, she would have said nothing about context.