logician
Well-Known Member
You believe wrong, Dawkin's "The God Delusion" makes a strong case that the probability that a supernatural creator exists is zero.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Has science revealed God?
- Thread starter ogmios
- Start date
You believe wrong, Dawkin's "The God Delusion" makes a strong case that the probability that a supernatural creator exists is zero.
ogmios
Man on a mission
Then you go right ahead and believe Dawkin, and not the FACT's in front of you
once again man prove's that the deceptive shroud is working on those who turn away from the light of truth!
Where there is light Darkness does not exist. Turn on the lights people:yes:
ogmios
Man on a mission
I can only be certain of one thing, if we were using all of our brains then there would be no war? No Conquest? No Superior Power? What about the death and destruction, is it justified? A civilisation of Human beings using their entire brain power would not have a part in war,greed,lies, and deception. They would be honest, caring peace loving all the time searching for happiness not looking for ways to out do one another, but a co-operation of minds working together to benefit everyone not just the singular that we see in the mirror every morning [not directed at you camanintx, generally speaking] I want peace and unity on the earth, don't you? If our minds are working at 100% level is it not our duty to our fellow man to help them become 100% active? How ridiculous are these truths?
camanintx
Well-Known Member
If we tried to use 100% of our brain we would probably have an aneurysm. Peace on Earth is more dependent on how we use our brains and not how much of it we use.
YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
Dawkins rocks!
PureX
Veteran Member
This is simply false. Science has yet to investigate in any way shape or form, the origin of whatever it was (a singularity?) that exploded (expanded) into our universe in the 'big bang'. We have no way of investigating anything that happened before this event and so we have no way of making any predictions whatever as to it's cause, if there is one.
logician
Well-Known Member
ogmios
Man on a mission
Probably have an aneurysm? I would love to know how to use the portion of my brain that as yet has not been turned on, I see the possibilities as endless. I agree with you on the "How we use our brains", From this you would have to agree that if man made more use of their brains there would be no war and peace would prevail.:angel2:
camanintx
Well-Known Member
Please show me where there is any part of the brain that is not "turned on".
darkendless
Guardian of Asgaard
It's quite simple, given current technology we cannot prove God doesn't exist, it's only a matter of time. I think human brain research will eventually discover the function our brain requires to conceptualize the super-natural. Open to debate however.
Also i think Dawkins gets a lot of stick for saying what a lot of atheists are thinking, he's just the only one honest enough to say it in a brutal way. Christains and all other religions do the same, they just go under the radar because we are sensitized to their condemning words by now.
Also i think Dawkins gets a lot of stick for saying what a lot of atheists are thinking, he's just the only one honest enough to say it in a brutal way. Christains and all other religions do the same, they just go under the radar because we are sensitized to their condemning words by now.
Rolling_Stone
Well-Known Member
Pretty presumptious, considering where it is now.
darkendless
Guardian of Asgaard
I have faith in science's ability to disprove everything, even itself. Why?, because there is always proof and a general acceptance within science.
ogmios
Man on a mission
Human conscience, some use it others choose not to.
spiritually inclined
Active Member
oops -- double post
spiritually inclined
Active Member
I don't at all understand how this discovery proves that there is a creator god. The discovery reveals something about the structure of the universe, but I don't see any evidence for a creator god yet.
You present your belief that this proves the existence of a creator god as a fact. I don't. I see a mathematical formula and observations about the universe.
James
You present your belief that this proves the existence of a creator god as a fact. I don't. I see a mathematical formula and observations about the universe.
James
KnowNothing12174
New Member
This is a very interesting post. However i believe that unfortunately every man creates his own universe. The image of god according to man is just as puzzling as mans image according to god. Theres an overabundance of variables as far as different points of view are concerned. Its impossible to tell gods form. Even if we were gifted with seeing god in our existence, it probably would have been an event that already occured that man either overlooked or hid in our past.
ogmios
Man on a mission
If the Mandelbot set is the basis for life in the universe, and the Mandelbrot set looks somewhat humanoid....and religions tell us we are created in God's image,
then one can only conclude that the Mandelbrot must be the basic image of God.No?
Yes!!!:angel2:
BucephalusBB
ABACABB
I keep looking at that picture, but you make the word "somewhat" bigger than it is.. I'd say it looks more like a turtle
No one is ever going to be able to prove or disprove God or any religion because all religons are about having blind faith in something. You can't prove it because you don't know its true, you just have faith that it is. And you can't disprove it because, well, theres no fact to disprove.