Hatred of Christianity!

[not nom]

lol...

when heathen hammer pointed out that neither northern folkore nor history contains no racial superiority stuff, you said, what school did you go to, slavery and holocaust happened (as if that would mean there was such stuff in northern lore or history). I made the mistake to respond to that, then the herp got derped.

it's not like you can actually name in what way I claimed the sky to be pink, can you? if you can, why mumble around so much? you enjoy distracting and repeating and posting your little smileys and playing to an audience that isn't even there, don't you?

I said the nazis were based mainly on nationalism, not "white supremacy". you turned that into stuff like that I said it had nothing to do with white supremacy, etc. strawman after strawman. of course the nazis were racist as ****. yet -- it wasn't white nations against non-white nations, and some ideas hitler might have had with england don't change how the nazis transpired in practice, and that the german people for the most part didn't think of it as a race war, but a german war. that doesn't make it better in any way, it's just a correction. to say white supremacy lead to the holocaust is ********. racism in combination with nationalism, christianity, industrialization etc. lead to the holocaust. americans came up with eugenics, not vikings.

and yes, I know that hypothetical person (who equates norse myths with skinheads etc.) was supposed to be clueless, I get that. however -- someone having prejudice against christians, would be somewhat justified by both the bible as well as history. not so much with vikings. duh!! that doesn't mean it's not still a fallacy to assume guilt by association, it means what it means.

so how is the sky pink in my account? be exact. and if you can, quote me or ACTUALLY paraphrase me, but stop putting words into my mouth, you suck at it so very badly. you make up for that by being obnoxious and pretending to not care, while also pretending to be bored, while also pretending to be amused because you didn't loose the plot many pages ago, even asking me who made the connection between white supremacy and norse mythology, when it was you.

and,

LOL! Yes, several posts after the fact.

no, that wasn't "several posts after the fact". the context was established BEFORE you responded to that post. I even went to the trouble of finding that and piecing the quotes together after you annoyed me enough, here: http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/2668917-post481.html

so you're either seriously illiterate, or flat out dishonest. I don't care either way, it's one of those and I'm simply being rude so you would stop responding to me. but I guess you can't win against that five year old "it's not my fault you're X" stuff. so have at it.

 

[Quagmire]

lol...

when heathen hammer pointed out that neither northern folkore nor history contains no racial superiority stuff, you said, what school did you go to, slavery and holocaust happened (as if that would mean there was such stuff in northern lore or history). I made the mistake to respond to that, then the herp got derped.

it's not like you can actually name in what way I claimed the sky to be pink, can you? if you can, why mumble around so much? you enjoy distracting and repeating and posting your little smileys and playing to an audience that isn't even there, don't you?

I said the nazis were based mainly on nationalism, not "white supremacy". you turned that into stuff like that I said it had nothing to do with white supremacy, etc. strawman after strawman. of course the nazis were racist as ****. yet -- it wasn't white nations against non-white nations, and some ideas hitler might have had with england don't change how the nazis transpired in practice, and that the german people didn't think of it as a race war, but a german war. that doesn't make it better in any way, it's just a correction. to say white supremacy lead to the holocaust is ********.

so how is the sky pink in my account? be exact. and if you can, quote me or ACTUALLY paraphrase me, but stop putting words into my mouth, you suck at it so very badly. you make up for that by being obnoxious and pretending to not care, while also pretending to be bored, while also pretending to be amused because you didn't loose the plot many pages ago, even asking me who made the connection between white supremacy and norse mythology, when it was you.

and,



no, that wasn't "several posts after the fact". the context was established BEFORE you responded to that post. I even went to the trouble of finding that and piecing the quotes together after you annoyed me enough, here: http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/2668917-post481.html

so you're either seriously illiterate, or flat out dishonest. I don't care either way, it's one of those and I'm simply being rude so you would stop responding to me. but I guess you can't win against that five year old "it's not my fault you're X" stuff. so have at it.

LOL!!! Just can't stop rewriting history can you? First it's world history and now the history of the "conversation" we just had.

If this is how you react every time someone shows you that you're talking nonsense, what are you doing in a debate forum?

 

[not nom]

LOL!!! Just can't stop rewriting history can you? First it's world history and now the history of the "conversation" we just had.

well, correct me then.

 

[krsnaraja]

Those who hate Christianity are envious of Christianity.

 

[not nom]

If this is how you react every time someone shows you that you're talking nonsense, what are you doing in a debate forum?

I liked the part where you claimed the context was explained several posts later, while stubbornly ignoring the evidence to the contrary, by the way ^^

and how you would rather distract, as predicted.

 

[krsnaraja]

I liked the part where you claimed the context was explained several posts later, while stubbornly ignoring the evidence to the contrary, by the way ^^

and how you would rather distract, as predicted.

This is another example of one who can`t accept defeat in a debate.

 

[not nom]

This is another example of one who can`t accept defeat in a debate.

yeah? back it up, unless you're just in it for the brownie points. how is the statement you quoted incorrect?

notice how you come on to me with what I consider a false statement. you think it's correct. you don't actually address it though. let's see what you consider that to be, shall we. wether you'll do, or retract, or simply keep responding pointless stuff, because hey, the more the merrier. monkey see monkey do.

 

[krsnaraja]

yeah? back it up, unless you're just in it for the brownie points. how is the statement you quoted incorrect?

notice how you come on to me with what I consider a false statement. you think it's correct. you don't actually address it though. let's see what you consider that to be, shall we. wether you'll do, or retract, or simply keep responding pointless stuff, because hey, the more the merrier. monkey see monkey do.

It`s when get mad you lose. It`s when you laugh you win.

 

[not nom]

what makes you think being cold with ASCII on the interwebs equates me being mad? heh. no, actually, when people (for some reason feel the need to) claim someone has lost a debate (can you even mention the debate? what specific point of it? lol), but can't back it up -- AKA when they lost -- they reach grasp for straws like you are doing. I asked you to argue for what you claimed -- and that's not an argument, but simply wishful thinking. I just type fast and plenty, always did

I'm not mad, I'm being arrogant. and it does serve a purpose: I love to be open and friendly to random strangers, but I can't tolerate intellectual leeches and deadwood. so I'm harsh that way. I don't even want to be around people who mind that. been there, done that, regretted every second of it.

 

[krsnaraja]

what makes you think being cold with ASCII on the interwebs equates me being mad? heh. no, actually, when people (for some reason feel the need to) claim someone has lost a debate (can you even mention the debate? what specific point of it? lol), but can't back it up -- AKA when they lost -- they reach grasp for straws like you are doing. I asked you to argue for what you claimed -- and that's not an argument, but simply wishful thinking. I just type fast and plenty, always did

I'm not mad, I'm being arrogant. and it does serve a purpose: I love to be open and friendly to random strangers, but I can't tolerate intellectual leeches and deadwood. so I'm harsh that way. I don't even want to be around people who mind that. been there, done that, regretted every second of it.

Alright. I surrender. You win! So what does that make you? 1000 frubals for a reward?

 

[Quagmire]

well, correct me then.

Dude, all you have to do is go back and re-read the whole conversation from the beginning.

I liked the part where you claimed the context was explained several posts later, while stubbornly ignoring the evidence to the contrary, by the way ^^

I always ignore fabricated evidence.

and how you would rather distract, as predicted.

You already seem pretty distracted.

 

[fallingblood]

I never posted "material", you're projecting. I made statements about christianity, and got tired of the strawman that this implies something about "all christians" or other such exaggerations, anything other than what I actually said.

after explaining the same simple things several times over to you and others, I got tired of it. it's a loop of derp and your character is ****, so what the hey. bye.

The "strawman" arguments that you are talking about though, simply didn't exist. As I showed many times, you were addressing things that never were said. In fact, many times you were arguing points that no one even brought up. But I guess calling all opposing views strawmen may make it easy for you to dismiss them, and thus not actually have to deal with the arguments.

 

[Heathen Hammer]

LOL!!! Just can't stop rewriting history can you? First it's world history and now the history of the "conversation" we just had.

If this is how you react every time someone shows you that you're talking nonsense, what are you doing in a debate forum?

He's got you pegged.

 

[Heathen Hammer]

Actually, the analogy used was not the context.

The analogy was not what I mentioned. My response, which is what I mentioned, contained the context.
How exactly would someone else's post, be me mentioning the context of my own statement? An especially puzzling position since YOU yourself quoted my own post, where this all started, and which showed the context.

Now it appears you are back peddling.

From the perceived tone of the post containing "if you were familiar" your phrase "if you were familiar" was a jab at the other persons alleged lack of knowledge...

It's not backpedaling at all. Wow, this 'protect your favorites' thing is really getting out of hand.

Tell you what. Here's an offer: go PM one of the other Heathens who resides here on this forum. Maybe there's even a staff person who is a Heathen; I don't know yet. Ask them if we always refer to our 'scriptures' as 'the lore'.

If you return and have been told that's the case, you can apologize. If they say I am wrong, have them come here and print so, and I will apologize to you, in this thread.

Put your money where your mouth is. I just did.

I'll wait.

Incidentally, I will also state: I can artistically weave jabs into statements made at people who insult me; I am capable of speaking a truth while at the same time flinging mud at someone. Quagmire has not participated in the thread at all, and his posts to me have all been insulting. I will certainly enthusiastically return it in spades in kind. Don't criticize me for insulting someone who insults me; I'm not a Christian and I am never required to turn the other cheek to an asshat, thank you.

 

[gnomon]

Incidentally, I will also state: I can artistically weave jabs into statements made at people who insult me; I am capable of speaking a truth while at the same time flinging mud at someone. Quagmire has not participated in the thread at all, and his posts to me have all been insulting. I will certainly enthusiastically return it in spades in kind. Don't criticize me for insulting someone who insults me; I'm not a Christian and I am never required to turn the other cheek to an asshat, thank you.

Who cares.

 

[Heathen Hammer]

Who cares.

Apparently Mestemia does, so I was polite enough to answer.

While I agree that much of this is academic and/or unproductive, should I simply not respond to people?

 

[not nom]

Who cares.

anyone who cares about themselves and the environment they fling their chips around in. that may not be you.. but who cares that you don't care?

It's not backpedaling at all. Wow, this 'protect your favorites' thing is really getting out of hand.

I know right? it's hilarious ^^

 

[not nom]

Dude, all you have to do is go back and re-read the whole conversation from the beginning.

I always ignore fabricated evidence.

right. those quotes, they have links in them.

in short, you got nothing. you just bluff a lot. you're a clown, go pat some toys on the back

 

[fallingblood]

right. those quotes, they have links in them.

in short, you got nothing. you just bluff a lot. you're a clown, go pat some toys on the back

Youre and Heathen Hammer are the ones who have now decided to avoid the information that has been presented and instead complain and argue about nonsense. Why not go back to the information, stop making excuses, and address the issues.

 

[not nom]

Youre and Heathen Hammer are the ones who have now decided to avoid the information that has been presented

lol?

quagmire has brought up the connection of norse mythology and white supremacy, then asked who brought that up, then stubbornly refused to acknowledge any of that. like 4-5 times, wtf hahahaha. the information that has been presented was mostly in response to strawmen. like to me, that "not all christians blah di blah". as if I didn't know that. and so on. but I didn't avoid that, I just think pointing it out 3 times or more is enough.

and instead complain and argue about nonsense.

you mean twisting my words? hahah. of course it's nonsense, but why would I stop "complaining"?

Why not go back to the information, stop making excuses, and address the issues.

because when I responded to it, I got nothing but jokes and repetition of those. when I say A and someone says B, I respond with C and they say B again, I become impatient real quick. I called it a loop of derp for a reason.

now when I said "so how did I misrepresent what went down?", he didn't really point that out. he said "just read it again", -- again, a loop. when heathen hammer answered a question, someone else says "who cares".

who's making excuses? quagmire for example, "I always ignore fabricated evidence.", referring to ******* QUOTES OF HIS OWN WORDS.

you don't even blink and have the gall to post the above? seriously, just don't talk to me. send your scent or whatever the **** it is you jokers are doing, but otherwise leave me alone, or be so kind and explain the ignore feature to me.