Would that be considered anthropomorphizing God?
I'm so sorry my friend, I didn't see this question. :sorry1:
I think considering the idea of God sending to people for Hell, especially for eternity is a form of anthromorphism in itself.
Eternity is a long, long time. If you took Mt. Everest, and every million years wiped it down with a piece of toilet paper, when one million Mt. Everests had been destroyed, you have not even blinked into eternity. And if you are in Hell, you are still being tortured.
If you took every grain of sand from the earth, and counted one grain every billion years, and counted as many worlds' grains of sand as there are grains of sand in this world... when you've done all that, you're still barely into eternity. And if you are in Hell, you are still being tortured.
The idea of giving God such a personality is projecting human attributes onto God. It's projecting the attitude of humans who live in a barren world who have to struggle to survive.
The Bedouin saying of "I against my brother, my brothers and I against my cousins, then my cousins and I against strangers." is valid for Bedouin nomads who struggle to survive in harsh conditions and is valid for those who struggle to survive, but there is no competition for God.
To me, the idea of eternal Hell is a projection of human ego as a way of opposing those who can't come round to your way of thinking and so are a threat.
God would gain absolutely nothing from having people be tortured for an eternity unless it was some sort of sadistic glee, which I do not believe is accurate for God.
Now, the dead being dead, or Hell as punishment to burn away sins, I can understand. Even, to some extent, the idea of Hell as punishment to burn away sins and then another death.
But eternity... no.