• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Hillary physically violent on Election Night, Mook and Podesta targets (Breaking)

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
hys·te·ri·a
[həˈstirēə, həˈsterēə]
NOUN

exaggerated or uncontrollable emotion or excitement, especially among a group of people:
"the mass hysteria that characterizes the week before Christmas"
synonyms: frenzy · [more]
psychiatry
a psychological disorder (not now regarded as a single definite condition) whose symptoms include conversion of psychological stress into physical symptoms (somatization), selective amnesia, shallow volatile emotions, and overdramatic or attention-seeking behavior. The term has a controversial history as it was formerly regarded as a disease specific to women.

I think we need a few hysterectomies around here.
I understand perfectly why you abandoned the line of reasoning in post #53.
Tom
 

Perditus

へびつかい座
I understand perfectly why you abandoned the line of reasoning in post #53.
Tom
I haven't abandoned it.

Clinton is a criminal, a liar, and a hypocrite. It's common knowledge.

Trump did an interview with "60 Minutes" on Sunday. I think you should watch it.

These are two fundamentally different people. Hillary is a major league typical crony politician.

Trump is new blood. His body language during that interview screamed open and honest.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Perhaps it's time to get over Hillary and get on with the reality?

Trump backpedaling on his campaign promises is much more interesting.
Tom
No, Trump is becoming dull.
A drunken violent Hillary is much more interesting.
Tell me more!
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It would explain why Bill is so flinchy.
th
 

Perditus

へびつかい座
Have you ever seen the "Star Trek" episode "Is There In Truth No Beauty?" It's the episode where anyone who looks is instantly driven insane.

They've finally figured out what's in the box . . .

Hillary Clinton
 

Neo Deist

Th.D. & D.Div. h.c.
CNN reporter told Todd Kincannon that Hillary Clinton became physically violent towards Robby Mook and John Podesta around midnight last Tuesday as the presidency was slipping away!

Whew! We dodged a bullet with that cracked Hillary, thank God she lost! Per the reporter, she was in a "psychotic drunken rage" and a doctor added sedatives to the mix.

This explains why she didn't come on stage after being buried by Trump who won big time.


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...-election-night-tore-robby-mook-john-podesta/

It is all media hearsay right now, so take it with a grain of salt. However, where there is smoke there is usually some type of fire, even if only a spark.

The same story also has her doctor giving her not only tranquilizers that night (which is why she did not come out on stage...drunk + doped up), but also amphetamines the next morning so that she could function and make public appearances. Supposedly she had nosebleeds all day because of the drug cocktails.

Another unconfirmed spin on the story is that around 1 am, Podesta told her that she needed to go out and confront the supporters that were at her "victory party." Her response was, "F... them. You do it." This was also supposedly leaked by a CNN reporter that was silenced by the execs.

What is confirmed is that multiple Secret Service agents (now retired) spoke about her being the first lady back in the 90s. She had a BAD temper and would throw things in the White House residence when she and Bill were arguing. One night, Bill got a cut on his head, but blamed it on walking into the door of the bathroom. SS agents later leaked that Hillary hit him in the head with a book, after the Monica scandal. Her unofficial nickname with the SS agents was "Broomstick 1."

Being assigned to her detail was considered a punishment.

Edit: if the stories turn out to be true (the SS one is) then it is a good thing that Hillary lost the election. It would confirm my suspicions that she is just a two faced, flip flopping, lying *** B**** that does not deserve anything other than a prison cell.
 
Last edited:

Acim

Revelation all the time
Bush was President. Hillary was only a candidate.

How is Hillary's reaction to losing the election relevant to anything?

For purposes of this thread, to show how spitefully she took it. Lashing out at her own people. As it relates to the 3rd debate, it is relevant, cause she could help quell protestors who are so bent out of shape they actually think what they are doing now could lead to Electorates voting her in over Trump. I think most people who pay attention to political reality know this has around .00005% chance of occurring. So, Hillary could make it clear, as often as needed, that really a peaceful transition to Trump being our next president is vital. And that we will judge him / his administration on what they actually do rather than all the made up LW nonsense.

Is it relevant to Obama's legacy? Is it relevant to how we judge Trump?

Yes, and yes. As (partially) explained above.

There will be protesters in the streets for the next four years. You know you can't keep blaming Hillary for that.

This type of protesting is different. Though could be fizzling out around now, not sure. If it continues though, it does seem to be in vein of trying to steal executive branch away from Trump in what is opposite attitude of peaceful transition. Essentially a coup d'etat.
 

Acim

Revelation all the time
Well, you're right. Hate and bigotry won.

Yep, protestors are filled with hate and enough of their own brand of bigotry to make it seem like Trump supporters are quiet, respectful people that sit at home awaiting the dawn of a new (political) age.
 

Acim

Revelation all the time
All of Trump's supporters may not be racists, bigots etc but all of them decided that racism (and a whole host of other problems) is simply not a deal-breaker.

Or understood what actual racism is and decided the LW false accusations of racism do not apply to Trump.
 

The Emperor of Mankind

Currently the galaxy's spookiest paraplegic
Or understood what actual racism is and decided the LW false accusations of racism do not apply to Trump.

Engaging in stereotyping, encouraging prejudice or violence against people based on their skin colour, ethnicity etc.

Such as the case of calling Mexicans, as a group, criminals, gaining the support of white supremacist groups like the KKK, his clashes with Native Americans, the fact that Trump backed the racist birther movement.

How many times do we need to point these out before Trump supporters finally admit that their candidate is a racist?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Such as the case of calling Mexicans, as a group, criminals......
This is oft repeated, but not supported by actual quotes from Trump.
Hillary had her KKK support too.
If this proves Donald is a racist, then does it prove she's one too?
How many times do we need to point these out before Trump supporters finally admit that their candidate is a racist?
You're pointing out things which are definitely bias confirming,
but they're not convincing anyone outside the LW echo chamber.
 
Top