McBell
Unbound
You should probably stop jumping to conclusions and making hasty assumptions.Another stupid facepalm, so you believe in the historical Jesus facepalm ?.
I mean, you have ALREADY destroyed one irony meter....
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You should probably stop jumping to conclusions and making hasty assumptions.Another stupid facepalm, so you believe in the historical Jesus facepalm ?.
Yes, there is. That's where the problem lies.
The strength of the evidence is in the eye of the beholder.
Suppose someone told you "I had a dream that Dan Wirey is cheating on his wife". That is evidence. Perhaps the weakest kind of evidence, especially if you have no particular reason to believe that a guy named Dan Wirey exists. But in the absence of any other evidence whatsoever it is the strongest evidence on the subject.
If a person wants to believe that Dan Wirey is a real person and a sleazy philanderer, this description of a dream might be "compelling evidence", which is the definition of proof.
This is the problem with religion. In the absence of any empirical evidence the weakest hearsay or delusion is the strongest evidence available to many people.
Tom
you can lead a horse to water...Are you stupid or something, I don't give a crap about your ignorant meter, I simply don't believe in the historical Jesus and you haven't shared nothing to me about that except your childishness.
I thought it was all about that, you just cannot let it go can you. If you don't have anything intelligent to share with me, then please keep out of my face.you can lead a horse to water...
On A Side Note...
Were you able to convince yourself in the other thread?
You would do good to follow your own advice.I thought it was all about that, you just cannot let it go can you. If you don't have anything intelligent to share with me, then please keep out of my face.
He He, your really up yourself aren't you, the vaccine thread is dead to me so why don't you go back there and mingle with your own kind.You would do good to follow your own advice.
Based on your posting history, we all know you will not.
Because you are making the exact same *** of yourself in this thread.He He, your really up yourself aren't you, the vaccine thread is dead to me so why don't you go back there and mingle with your own kind.
There is so much of it . . .
I don't know where to start
So are you saying that there is proof of the historical Jesus, if so could I ask where did you get that info from, and please don't be rude ?.That parts wrong.
That part I believe.
Show evidence please.Because you are making the exact same *** of yourself in this thread.
Again, you can lead a horse to water...
So are you saying that there is proof of the historical Jesus, if so could I ask where did you get that info from, and please don't be rude ?.
So are you saying that there is proof of the historical Jesus
Show evidence please.
There is so much of it I don't know where to start, so here is one place you could go to.
This brief piece of evidence which supposedly contributed the best "proof" of Jesus's existence has actually been proven to be a fraud. It has been demonstrated continuously over the centuries that "Testamonium Flavium" was a forgery manufactured by the Catholic Church, and was inserted into Josephus's works. The Testamonium Flavium account is so thoroughly refuted, that biblical scholars since the 19th century have refused to refer to it, unless to mention its false nature.
JESUS CHRIST - NO HISTORICAL EVIDENCE
Sure:Show evidence please.
Your out of your league here. Its time you let it go brother.
No its not, there is so much evidence you would have to be a morn not to see it.To refresh your memory: you said that the Josephus references to Jesus had been proven fraudulent. Jay asked you for evidence. You said, "There's so much of it I wouldn't know where to start".
Burden of proofs on you.
It just never happened, simple.The statement is a fallacy on your part.
No historian proves anything.
Science does not prove anything, so how can you apply that methodology to history?
Paul never meant the Christ to be a man, the Christ to Paul was a Christ Consciousness, nothing to do with a man called Jesus.The Gospels
Paul
Tacitus
Josephus
Now, you don't have to like it, and it doesn't have to be strong evidence. But it factually is evidence that a man existed, and there is almost a complete consensus of those who are educated at the highest levels on the subject, and all agree. The baptism and crucifixion are certain enough they are considered fact.
I don't have to do what you think I should do, your just trying to pick on me because you hate my guts, and you would love to see me gone from this forum, am I right ???.Btw, if you're going to use someone else's material, you need to either format it as a quote, or put quotation marks front and back..