TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Yes, just as people still do.
That is absolutely preposterous.
Now we have elaborate legal systems to establish and enforce those ideals. Then we did not.
Even the most primitive rules of social conduct includes basic rules about murder and theft and alike.
Religions themselves were thought of by people. This is why they reflect the ethical standards of the times and cultures they were born in.
So we really needed religions and their taboos and superstitions to do that for us. You think because there are other mechanisms, now, that religions were never necessary in this regard, but that's quite untrue.
No, what is always necessary are basic rules of conduct. Societies that don't have such, won't last very long.
Religion was, at best, another incarnation of such.
Not that religion didn't serve a purpose - obviously it did.
But religion is not the origin of these things.
And it still is. Because even today, we can do significant harm to each other without breaking any laws, or incurring the wrath of our legal system. Something religions can still do.
How exactly do religions do that?
I also note that you have quite the authoritarian mindset. You seem to think that ethical behavior and standards are only possible when a feared authority commands them to be upheld.
That's not moral behavior though. That's just obedience.