• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Homosexual scandals vs heterosexual scandals

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
We're not making a big deal out of them being to men together. Most think it tacky and foolish. But they don't call it fooling around for no reason.

If he compelled her do it....we would obliterate his career.
Thank you for acknowledging that feminists apply double standards.

Certain feminists are so radical...that even if there was a video where the woman is on the top (let's call it "Amazon's ride", right?), they would call that piece of evidence "non consensual sex".
Aka rape.
Because: all straight sex is rape.
 
Last edited:

PureX

Veteran Member
Sex scandals aren't about the sex. They're about the hypocrisy. No one cares about some politician getting caught in a sexual tryst unless that politician has been building a career on condemning others for their sexual interests and behaviors. Republicans in the U.S. have a particular problem with this because they are constantly trying to paint themselves as the moral superiors of everyone else. So that when it becomes apparent by their behavior that they are not, it's seen as being especially 'scandalous'.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
The problem is that homosexual sex is considered "locker room, comradely fun between hunks" and not something scandalous.

Every time a congressperson or a politician has a heterosexual intercourse (vaginal intercourse), the feminists have an inhumane reaction (you know similar to the reaction many had when Trump was elected)...
You make 2 claims and 1 inference here which I don't think are really justified. In fact, many people do think homosexual sex is sinful, scandalous or what-have-you. It's just that they know it happens and shrug it off.

Second claim, that feminists all react to heterosexual sex, which I'm fairly sure they do not.

You infer that an intern gets the same level of attention that a congressperson or politician does. I'm fairly sure that they don't -- although people now hold politicians up as role models much less than in the past -- for obvious reasons.

Sex is something people do, so stop getting all wound up about it. And doing it in public places is a bit of a thrill for some. You should listen to a wonderful old song by Jake Thackray, called "Isabel Makes Love Upon National Monuments." Lyrics below:

Isabel makes love upon national monuments
With style and enthusiasm and anyone at all.
Isabel's done Stonehenge and the Houses of Parliament,
But so far little Isabel's never played the Albert Hall.
Many a monolith has seen Isabel,
Her bright hair in turmoil, her breasts' surging swell.
But unhappy Albert, so far denied
The bright sight of Isabel getting into her stride.

The Forth Bridge, The Cenotaph, Balmoral and Wembley.
The British Museum and the House of Lords.
So many ticks in her National Trust catalogue,
But so far the Royal Albert Hall has not scored.
Countless cathedrals can now proudly show
Where Isabel's white shoulder blades have briefly reposed.
Miserable Albert, still waiting for
The imprint of Isabel on his parquet floor.

In Westminster Abbey she lay upon a cold tombstone,
The meat in a sandwich of monumental love,
With old po-faced Wordsworth unblinking beneath
And a bright-eyed young Arch-Deacon breathless above.
Many a stony faced statue has flickered its eyes
And swayed to the rhythm of her little panting cries.
But oh! wretched Albert never yet has known
Isabel's pretty whinnying echo round his dome.

On the last night of the Promenades she waved to the conductor
And there and then on the podium, with scarcely a pause,
With a smile and a bow and a loud "Rule Britannia!"
He completed her collection to enormous applause.
Rapturous Albert now knows full well
He's captured forever elusive Isabel.
Prettily dishevelled but firmly installed
And faithfully for evermore to the Royal Albert Hall.

No more frantic scramblings up the dome of St. Pauls.
No more dank rambles on Hadrian's Wall.
With style and enthusiasm and anyone at all,
Isabel makes love in the Royal Albert Hall.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Sex scandals aren't about the sex. They're about the hypocrisy. No one cares about some politician getting caught in a sexual tryst unless that politician has been building a career on condemning others for their sexual interests and behaviors. Republicans in the U.S. have a particular problem with this because they are constantly trying to paint themselves as the moral superiors of everyone else. So that when it becomes apparent by their behavior that they are not, it's seen as being especially 'scandalous'.
You deserve a round of applause for saying the plain truth.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Sex scandals aren't about the sex. They're about the hypocrisy. No one cares about some politician getting caught in a sexual tryst unless that politician has been building a career on condemning others for their sexual interests and behaviors. Republicans in the U.S. have a particular problem with this because they are constantly trying to paint themselves as the moral superiors of everyone else. So that when it becomes apparent by their behavior that they are not, it's seen as being especially 'scandalous'.
Pretty sure it wasn't even a politician.
 

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
If it had dealt with a senator and his mistress "having fun" in that room...an army of misandric feminists would have skinned that senator alive.
Admit that ;)
It wasn't a senator or any elected official. Admit that
Double standards.
If a senator had been there, having sex with a woman...he would be in jail now.
No he wouldn't
Absolutely not.
They belong in jail. That room is a sacred institutional place that cannot be profaned.
Your own OP link says there was no crime committed.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Anyone that pretends to be 'holier than thou' is susceptible to scandal when it becomes apparent that they aren't. Preachers and politicians, mostly. Which nowadays mostly means "the right".
This was according to the OP, an intern, engaging in a sexual act with another consenting adult. I don't think it's much of anything.
 
Top