I am a candid angel compared to Fallaci.You confuse insults with truth.
Candor needn't include insults.
She would sound very crass and insulting in your ears.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I am a candid angel compared to Fallaci.You confuse insults with truth.
Candor needn't include insults.
Thank you for acknowledging that feminists apply double standards.We're not making a big deal out of them being to men together. Most think it tacky and foolish. But they don't call it fooling around for no reason.
If he compelled her do it....we would obliterate his career.
What if it was a male intern having sex with a female intern.It was an intern. It was consensual. Nothing to see here. Move along.
This is America. We call it "cow girl" in these parts.Amazon's ride", right
Nope. Rape is rape. Sex is sex. Adultery is adultery. So on and so on.Because: all straight sex is rape
You make 2 claims and 1 inference here which I don't think are really justified. In fact, many people do think homosexual sex is sinful, scandalous or what-have-you. It's just that they know it happens and shrug it off.The problem is that homosexual sex is considered "locker room, comradely fun between hunks" and not something scandalous.
Every time a congressperson or a politician has a heterosexual intercourse (vaginal intercourse), the feminists have an inhumane reaction (you know similar to the reaction many had when Trump was elected)...
It wouldn't matter. Interns have sex? Wow, who knew? LOLWhat if it was a male intern having sex with a female intern.
You deserve a round of applause for saying the plain truth.Sex scandals aren't about the sex. They're about the hypocrisy. No one cares about some politician getting caught in a sexual tryst unless that politician has been building a career on condemning others for their sexual interests and behaviors. Republicans in the U.S. have a particular problem with this because they are constantly trying to paint themselves as the moral superiors of everyone else. So that when it becomes apparent by their behavior that they are not, it's seen as being especially 'scandalous'.
Pretty sure it wasn't even a politician.Sex scandals aren't about the sex. They're about the hypocrisy. No one cares about some politician getting caught in a sexual tryst unless that politician has been building a career on condemning others for their sexual interests and behaviors. Republicans in the U.S. have a particular problem with this because they are constantly trying to paint themselves as the moral superiors of everyone else. So that when it becomes apparent by their behavior that they are not, it's seen as being especially 'scandalous'.
It wasn't a senator or any elected official. Admit thatIf it had dealt with a senator and his mistress "having fun" in that room...an army of misandric feminists would have skinned that senator alive.
Admit that
No he wouldn'tDouble standards.
If a senator had been there, having sex with a woman...he would be in jail now.
Your own OP link says there was no crime committed.Absolutely not.
They belong in jail. That room is a sacred institutional place that cannot be profaned.
any reason to think that other than your personal hatred of women?I seriously doubt his wife is heterosexual.
So why would she care?
Absolutely not.
They belong in jail. That room is a sacred institutional place that cannot be profaned.
That's for sure.There's nothing sacred about that place.
Well, we just don't believe in many sacred places, if any at all.That's for sure.
I mean...the Congresspeople have desecrated it since ages...with their disloyalty.
I am a big fan of her. I read all her works in original language.I am a candid angel compared to Fallaci.
She would sound very crass and insulting in your ears.
Nice...so you agree with her... ?I am a big fan of her. I read all her works in original language.
Ciao
- viole
Yes. Her views on Islam are where I mostly agree with her. I do not see a big difference between moderate and extreme Islam.Nice...so you agree with her... ?
Anyone that pretends to be 'holier than thou' is susceptible to scandal when it becomes apparent that they aren't. Preachers and politicians, mostly. Which nowadays mostly means "the right".Pretty sure it wasn't even a politician.
This was according to the OP, an intern, engaging in a sexual act with another consenting adult. I don't think it's much of anything.Anyone that pretends to be 'holier than thou' is susceptible to scandal when it becomes apparent that they aren't. Preachers and politicians, mostly. Which nowadays mostly means "the right".
Me either. Unless one of them was making political hay out of promoting hate against homosexuals.This was according to the OP, an intern, engaging in a sexual act with another consenting adult. I don't think it's much of anything.