Homosexual scandals vs heterosexual scandals

[Kathryn]

Me either. Unless one of them was making political hay out of promoting hate against homosexuals.

Is someone involved doing so?

 

[PureX]

Is someone involved doing so?

I have no idea. I don't pay attention to that stuff. I am aware of several prominent republican politicians over the years that got caught out in that way. And we are all aware of the famous preachers that this happened to. And of course there was Clinton and afew democrats as well. Though they tend not to be so self-righteous beforehand that it shocks people when they get caught. Liberals tend to be more liberal, after all, about this sort of thing.

 

[Kathryn]

I have no idea. I don't pay attention to that stuff. I am aware of several prominent republican politicians over the years that got caught out in that way. And we are all aware of the famous preachers that this happened to. And of course there was Clinton and afew democrats as well. Though they tend not to be so self-righteous beforehand that it shocks people when they get caught. Liberals tend to be more liberal, after all, about this sort of thing.

I don't pay any attention to what interns do anyway. I mean, unless they are really vocal about whatever, which they probably aren't.

 

[Estro Felino]

Nope. Rape is rape. Sex is sex. Adultery is adultery. So on and so on.

Most men aren't rapists. Most men don't chase any woman because they have high standards of beauty.

Rapists are sick people who belong in a penal institution. They don't chase for pretty women. They chase the women they cannot have.
They are not aroused by nymphos. They want the women who reject them...which arouses them. Even if they are dogs.

 

[McBell]

This question was eluded: why didn't the Democratic Party publicly condemn what happened in the Senate Hearing Room?
Why didn't any dem voter?

Funny.
There is not a single question mark in your OP...

I am very serious.
I am mentioning that psychiatric issues are involved, here.

I understand that your OP was serious.
At least to you.

What psychiatric issues?
Be specific.

 

[McBell]

It's illegal to have sex in the Senate Hearing Room. Period.

Please be so kind as to present the actual law.

 

[McBell]

I repeat it: if the video was about a man and a woman having sex in that hearing room, do you think the conclusions would have been identical?

No, it wouldn't.
We would have never even heard about it had it not been a homosexual act.

Don't elude the question.

I didn't

 

[Estro Felino]

No, it wouldn't.
We would have never even heard about it had it not been a homosexual act.

There is a video that leaked.
I meant if that the video in question was about a man and a woman.

 

[McBell]

There is a video that leaked.
I meant if that the video in question was about a man and a woman.

Then it would have been completely dropped just like the one with the homosexuals.

I take that back.
It would have been dropped much faster.

 

[Estro Felino]

Then it would have been completely dropped just like the one with the homosexuals.

I take that back.
It would have been dropped much faster.

May I doubt that?
Considering the fuss made over Clinton and Lewinski having sex at the WH?

 

[McBell]

May I doubt that?

Feel free

Considering the fuss made over Clinton and Lewinski having sex at the WH?

That was mostly Kenneth Starr having it out for Bill Clinton.
The Star report was a colossal waste of time and money.

 

[McBell]

It's illegal to have sex in the Senate Hearing Room. Period.

Please be so kind as to present the actual law.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Having sex while not tolerating that other human beings have sex too.

What is it that you are actually referring to?
On what basis do you say this?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

If the consensual act in the Senate Hearing Room had been between man and a woman (let's say senator and intern), I guess there would have been an inhumane reaction among the feminists.

On what basis do you make this claim?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Being fired is not enough.
In my country that would result in a civil trial.
(and maybe even criminal trial).

What would be the charges?

The fact that no trial has followed clearly shows the juridical doublestandardism...

How so?

that is even the judiciary has psychiatric bias...
because if a senator had had sex in the Hearing Room with a woman, he would be in jail by now.

How so? On what basis do you make this claim?
Which precedents do you have in mind, specifically?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Question: if the two interns having sex in that Hearing Room had been a man and a woman, do you think people would have had the same reaction?

Sure, why not?
There's nothing at all about this incident which involves the sexual orientation or gender of the people to be of any kind of special interest.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Again...I believe homosexual sex is considered comradely fun between gentlemen...

In the US of A??????

On what planet do you live????

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Why the distinction between homosexual sex and heterosexual sex? No one else is making this distinction.

She has a tendency to be obsessed with sexual things and she also has an uncanny and bizarre negative attitude towards gay sex eventhough she herself is a transgender and thus technically gay as well.

I find it all to be quite confusing.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

In my country politicians don't need to hide when they have a sex life.
They have sex aboveboard.

Myeah.... like Gennaro Sangiuliano.
Ow, wait.......................

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

What if it was a male intern having sex with a female intern.

Pot8to, potato