McBell
Unbound
I have to ask: Why?I am in the same opinion that mixed sex couples should be top of the list for adopting and raising a child and that definately the next best option is a same sex couple followed by a single parent.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I have to ask: Why?I am in the same opinion that mixed sex couples should be top of the list for adopting and raising a child and that definately the next best option is a same sex couple followed by a single parent.
Again I have to ask: Why?What i'm saying is that of all the most loving and supportive environments, a mixed sex couple is the most ideal, followed by same sex couples, then single parents.
to answer that question yes i do think the child is more likely to be gay,i think it comes from monkey see monkey do.If for example the two dads are having a big tonguey kiss on the sofa (yuk)as is normal in a relationship it is deemed to be the norm for kids as they grow up.To back this up and it is not in anyway the same as being gay,children who are abused as children go on to abuse their children i think the percentage is quite high around 75%, so yes i do
Then would you be so kind as to explain homosexuals who were raised in a heterosexual environment?to answer that question yes i do think the child is more likely to be gay,i think it comes from monkey see monkey do.If for example the two dads are having a big tonguey kiss on the sofa (yuk)as is normal in a relationship it is deemed to be the norm for kids as they grow up.To back this up and it is not in anyway the same as being gay,children who are abused as children go on to abuse their children i think the percentage is quite high around 75%, so yes i do
then i look forwards to the studies you will produce to support your premise that children will be seriously mentally confused by the new situation.
our moaning is a pain in your butt? selfish to want to not be discriminated against? i'm going to go have a cigarette and a shower before i answer this part of your post, it wound me up. a lot.
Again I have to ask: Why?
You do know that this is year 2007 right?Don't get me wrong, I think the most important thing is a loving family unit. I just think a mixed sex couple is more ideal because I think some issues are better dealt with by the father and some issues are better dealt with by the mother.
For example, if a teenage girl gets her first period, I think that issue is going to be dealt with better by a mother.
When lads learn to pee standing up. I think thats something for the father to teach.
The sexual issues. I think it's best to have input from both sexes rather than just one.
I'm finding it hard to explain but I am not saying that ALL mixed sex loving couples make better parents than gay couples because that's not true.
I just personally think that a mixed sex couple is more ideal.
You do know that this is year 2007 right?
When I use sarcasm I putWhy the sarcasm?
Some people are just that way,some people are gay and then turn hetresexual some bi sexual.But the question i was asked was about kids and kids see and kids do,kids play at being parents because they copy what they see but i cannot say why people from a hetresexual family become or are gay.Then would you be so kind as to explain homosexuals who were raised in a heterosexual environment?
Kinda kills your theory, don't you think?Some people are just that way,some people are gay and then turn hetresexual some bi sexual.But the question i was asked was about kids and kids see and kids do,kids play at being parents because they copy what they see but i cannot say why people from a hetresexual family become or are gay.
And what I'm saying is that your assertion amounts to little more than baseless and bigoted nonsense for which you offer not the slightest support.What i'm saying is that of all the most loving and supportive environments, a mixed sex couple is the most ideal, followed by same sex couples, then single parents.
I was going to put that but it seemed like too much of an obvious answer.
Of course the child should be put in the best environment. What i'm saying is that of all the most loving and supportive environments, a mixed sex couple is the most ideal, followed by same sex couples, then single parents.
Sorry,i had no intention of winding you up,i myself have nothing to get wound up about so if i come accross as insensative i apologise.
And what I'm saying is that your assertion amounts to little more than baseless and bigoted nonsense for which you offer not the slightest support.
How could anyone know that? At best, it is a subjective opinion of yours, which will no doubt be formed around your moralities and thoughts (and there is nothing wrong with that). The point is, that without having 3 cloned babies, brought up in identical environments, by parents who themselves are clones, it can at best only be an opinion - as it happens, I disagree with you entirely; I think Jay's reply mirrors my thoughts to a tee.
Based on what?Yes it is my opinion. I apologies if it came across as me claiming to know 100% that the best environment for a child IS a mixed sex couple.
I just personally think it is.
Kinda kills your theory, don't you think?
Based on what?