McBell
Unbound
Huh.?for all you people who believe in god, please explain the dinosaurs?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Huh.?for all you people who believe in god, please explain the dinosaurs?
They are not in the Bible because they are not pertinent to it.then where did dinosaurs come from, whose image were they created in and why are they not in the bible
what are you talking about?they are pertinent to truth though
are they not?
Failing because I have no idea what it is you wanting to know.failing because you don't know the answer?
or failing because i question made up stories and base my opinions on actual facts and not speculation or interpretation
ROTFLMFAOyet again another sorry sap angry at the fact that there are still those that question the gullible nature of man.
"Cult: a small unpopular religion.
Religion: a large popular cult."
yet again another sorry sap angry at the fact that there are still those that question the gullible nature of man.
"Cult: a small unpopular religion.
Religion: a large popular cult."
Define 'God'can u prove there is a god
Which Jesus?can u prove jesus existed
Define "angels"can u prove there are angels
Define "demons"can u prove there are demons
Do you know their names?i can prove the dinosaurs existed
Um...I made a simple question simply wanted to know why so many people can look to the Bible for answers and say it is based on actual people and events but the answer to my question is no where to be found in the book.
What is a proven lie, who proved it, and what is their proof?This book talks about creation and how the world was made, proven lie.
Water under the bridge.I guess I was wrong about my assumption of MR. M , my apologies
Interestingly enough, I still do not know what it is that you are actually asking.Fact still remains neither of you have answered the question
I ask these questions as I am truly perplexed, not having a go at you.
How do you continue to believe and have faith in the bible when it is rife with misinformation, misleading and at times outright lies. My examples are:
Mankind is around 4000-6000 years old. Science has proven beyond any doubt that we are at least 60, 000 years old for homo-sapiens, then we have all of the other variations of man prior.
Noah's flood was global. It was regional! Sediment layers, ice cores and many many other facts provea global flood as incorrect.
The sun goes up and down. The earth orbit the sun and may give this appearance to assuming people- but if the bible was the word of god then this literary error would not have occurred.
If the bible really and truly is the word of god, how did these very fundamental facts get so wrong? There are literally hundreds more, but I use these 3 are they have been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Don't Matthew 1:117 and Luke 3:2328 present detailed genealogies of Jesus showing 75 generations from Adam? Even using some of the more generous ages for some of these people, 4,000 to 6,000 years is stretching it.#1 no where in scripture have I seen it say man kind or the earth was 4,000-6,000 years old its all how you interpret or whos teachings you listen to.
Blessed be Her holy hooves.I would suggest looking through 'answers in the Quran'. i'm sure there are some there too.
BTW: there is no prove for or against Invisible Pink Unicorns. go ahead, believe in them, they'll take you to the meddow of love and happiness if you do.
for all you people who believe in god, please explain the dinosaurs?
simple question god created man in his image
then where did dinosaurs come from, whose image were they created in and why are they not in the bible
Yup. They say they know better that anthropologists. Also archeologists. Also geologists, astronomers, biologists, physicists, cosmologists, paleontologists, and scientists in general. They reject science as a method of learning about the world. What's really ironic is that they do it on their computer!Biblical Christains (who take the Bible literally) respond that they have more faith in the Bible, which consistently and basically lays down a detailed and dated history of mankind, than in the beliefs and estimates of anthropologists whose dates and views of human evolution and origins are often shifting, and based upon what they themselves bring to their finding by way of opinion, prefered view or model, or school of thought.
Yup. That's how we know it's wrong.the Bible describes Noah's flood as being global. while a local flood may have occured as well, the Great Flood of Noah was described as being global and total in scale.
Not exactly. What they actually indicate is that there have been thousands of local depositions. That is, the evidence shows that most of the world has been underwater at one time or another, but the entire world has never been underwater at once.rock structures in and of themselves around the world do indicate the depoisting of huge layers of sediment quickly and globally, and not just locally.
They may, except they don't, because they base their conclusions on the evidence, and the evidence is clear that there has never been one global flood. I can't think of a single geologist who accepts Noah's flood, can you? It's too inconsistent with the evidence.geologists *may* read this as evidence of one global flood (or for others as evidence of many great flood over time and place),
Yup. Because, as I said, most of the world has been underwater at one time or another.yet large layers of sediment do appead around the world, and not just in one place.
no where in the Bible does it say that the sun circles the earth. it is mentioned that the sun has stood still in the sky, and that the sun moved across the sky, but this is more an observation of how it would indeed look from earth, not a statement on which body orbits which.