esmith
Veteran Member
Then I would assume that you think I have the right to make a observation about your character? I do believe that is in direct violation of the forum rules is it not.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
House Democrats Vote To Violate The Law
- Thread starter esmith
- Start date
There's never a need to go there.
Unjust accusations tell us more about the accuser than the accused.
Commentary doesn't add anything.
We're not done with you yet.
There's blood yet to be drained !!!
tytlyf
Not Religious
You always troll with hyperbolic fake news threads. Nothing new here.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Pointing out inconsistencies regarding what you're expressed with your posts isn't a personal attack. If you feel that it is, go ahead and report me.
esmith
Veteran Member
Nah, having too much fun.
Forgot today is April 2nd not April 1st disregard post #42
But in my opinion the House is putting the cart before the horse in this instance. Of course, I tilted a pin-ball machine back in 1961 so I do make mistakes.
Why did Barr even do a summary in the first place? That is not his job. There is nothing in the legislation that says the AG is supposed to do a summary.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yes, an attorney. That does not limit it to Trump's attorney.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
April 3 at the earliest. Even all the way to the international dateline.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
The summary is not worth anything. He can pretend that it is, but refusing to release the report that he earlier advocated releasing does not look good for him. All the Democrats need to so is to continually release videos of Trump saying 'release the entire report' or very close to that.
You'd have to ask him.
The last time I took a civics course was in 1968.
Not to you.
But I notice that Trump is chortling, & the Dems' sails are flaccid.
So it's worth much to him.
I assume you're addressing me, since your post followed mine.
I don't know that any law regarding the report has been or will be violated.
We're just discussing it...trying to figure it all out.
So you're jumping the gun over imagined hypocrisy.
So you were on top of things in 1974 when Leon Jaworski asked a Federal Court to release Grand Jury information to Congress.
I should have tied my post to the OP but neglected to do.
I was still celebrating the end of the draft a year earlier.
That & engine school occupied all my time.
That quote feature is really useful.
In the news....
House Judiciary authorizes subpoena for full Mueller report
House Judiciary authorizes subpoena for full Mueller report
Unfortunately, releasing an unredacted report to congress is pretty much the same as releasing an unredacted report to the public considering all of the leaks coming from Washington these days.
Congress doesn't trust the AG, no reason for the AG to trust congress. If they are going to release it to congress they might as well release it to the public. maybe they should just dismiss any pending cases that would be affected by the release.