• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How about Violence be the next "Gay Movement"?

McBell

Unbound
I don't believe it to be violent when compared to the definition of violence. So no, the is not inconsitancy. Amazing how you can continue to stick to a point as to drown something for self amusement. Speaking of childish!
Reminds me of a child seeking attention. How old are you again?
Who is more childish, the person pointing out an inconsistency or the person who insists that the inconsistency is not an inconsistency merely because they do not believe it is an inconsistency?
 

Just_me_Mike

Well-Known Member
Who is more childish, the person pointing out an inconsistency or the person who insists that the inconsistency is not an inconsistency merely because they do not believe it is an inconsistency?

Belief and observation are not the same. Compare the video to the definition and present the facts. Shouldn't be that hard for you, and you might contribute some value for a change.
 

McBell

Unbound
Belief and observation are not the same.
I completely agree.
Interestingly enough you have shown that your belief that a violent move is not violent is completely different from the observation of the use of said violent move in your presented video.

Then you state that the move is violence.
Only you added "minimized to the nth degree".
I asked you to make up your mind.

Your reply was that said move is not violent simply because YOU BELIEVE it is not violent.

Yet I am the one being childish?


Compare the video to the definition and present the facts. Shouldn't be that hard for you, and you might contribute some value for a change.
I have compared the video to the definition and have concluded, based on YOUR presented definition that the move is in fact violent.
You even agreed that the move is violent.
But then you claim it is not violent.

So you seem to STILL be of two minds about it.
 

Just_me_Mike

Well-Known Member
I was giving latitude by saying it was minimized to the nth degree. Personally I don't think it is violent from the definition I provided and in the context Linwood asked about. You disagree, no big deal.
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
So, wait....are y'all gonna break out in a fight or what?

Well, just as long as it's within the bounds of RF rules and regulations, it would be kinda cool in this thread specifically. :popcorn:
 

Just_me_Mike

Well-Known Member
Oh really? Mr. Non-Violence? :bounce

Just give me and my disciplinary tools an hour of your time. You might find some benefit in pain and suffering. ;)
I'd try it out just to see what it is like. Your place or mine?

Yes I am Mr. Bad ***, peace is a great idea but not very practical is it?
 

Yona

Frum Mastah Flex
No, sometimes violence is necessary such as killing Hitler, Mussolini or even ordained by G-d himself (see: Tanakh).

It would be nice to live in a world without violence but that is not the world we live in.

Honestly, if I could have killed Hitler or Mussolini, I would have, without hesitation. Similarly I would have also executed the king of France during the revolution.
 
Last edited:

Midnight Pete

Well-Known Member
No, sometimes violence is necessary such as killing Hitler, Mussolini or even ordained by G-d himself (see: Tanakh).

It would be nice to live in a world without violence but that is not the world we live in.

Honestly, if I could have killed Hitler or Mussolini, I would have, without hesitation. Similarly I would have also executed the king of France during the revolution.

At what point do you commit so much murder that you become that which you deem unworthy of life? There is no end to the Hitlers and Mussolini and Kings of France. You'd never stop killing people.
 
Top