• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

how can we "see" God?

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God" (Matthew 5:8).

Exactly Amanaki. Purity of heart not worldly knowledge or possessions is the criteria. A pure heart cannot be bought.
I don't think anyone will ever have a perfectly "pure" heart, but there are those moment of beliefs when a person let's go and believes in something greater than themselves that there is a spiritual connection. And the person can feel God's presence and get like a vision and understanding that awakens something in them to where they know God is real. It's happening to me believing three different contradictory things though.

So besides what happened to me, I believe anyone, in any spiritual path or religion, when they surrender themselves to that greater spiritual reality of their religion, I do believe they feel it and become sort of "one" with God. I'm sure this Christian that started this thread feels God and believes he knows God by what he believes and thinks the Bible is saying. Just like I'm sure you get the same feeling from the Baha'i Scriptures. The feeling is the same, but how each of you got there is contradictory. So is it really the beliefs or the letting go?
 

Hawkins

Well-Known Member
how can we "see" God?
we have any kind of food with any kind of taste. we have any kind of drink with any kind of taste. we have any kind of material to build and make anything we want, the world is the place to be. evolution couldn't do this. bible quote: "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:" (Matthew 7:7). this is not the kingdom of God. believe in the magic soup of darwin (satan), believe in the frog which became a prince, believe in satan. (bad advice). even if you see God, nothing can make you believe that He is God, nothing can make you believe His law, only faith can do that. how did Lord Jesus anticipate His success, the success of christianity? simple, He knows God, and He is the Son of God.
8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. (Revelation 1:8)

illogical atheism:
who made christianity and why? who made the old testament and why? you don't believe in Lord Jesus, so someone lied and made the new testament for an evil reason, according to your opinion. those who lied, they believed in evolution? or other gods? because God and evolution are the only solutions that explain our existence. so there is this possibility, some ancient men believed in evolution but they hid that until darwin bringing to the public, so darwin ruins their plan and you the same, to be liars forever because we die, they can't enjoy of "masterplan", makes perfect sense, the irony. the old testament could be made for the same reason or made by lunatics. again, this makes perfect sense, irony again. in conclusion, darwin was an outlaw, ancient men believed in evolution, or other gods and they lied to us, making us believe in Lord Jesus. perfect sense (irony).

For the sake of argument, let's assume that God actually exists. He has the following characteristics,
He's invisible in nature unless He would like to take an image for us to see, usually it is in a human form (but not necessarily in our realm/space).
He has a covenant to abide by that humans will have to rely on faith to be saved. If He shows up publicly, no men can be savable.

So under the circumstance, what should He do?

As an analogy, if you ever swallowed a small bead when you were 2 years old, then how can we know? Your mom didn't take you to see a doctor for some reason as she assumed the bead did no harm and it would come out several days later. What we can know is through your mom as she's the only first hand eyewitnesses. Then she might have told those around her, such as your brothers or your neighbors, we then will approach them to see if what she said today remains consistent with what she told other back then, this is a process of credibility checking.
Humans rely on faith in testimonies from first hand eyewitnesses to get to a truth, at best we examine the credibility of those who made the testimonies. A truth is conveyed so because under normal circumstance humans lack the ability to get to a long past with evidence. All histories need faith to get to, no matter what, especially about individual activities. Some rare mass activities may leave a trail for us to examine, say an ancient site is somehow conserved till today for us to study the social behavior of those humans living on the site long ago. But we don't have the ability to pin-point individual activities happened historically, such as the bead swallowed by you in this analogy.

God's truth is conveyed in the same manner. He let the Jews witness who He is, for their testimonies to be believed by the rest to reach the truth. A religion is needed because secular means don't work, they don't convey a theology involving supernatural activities. They also need faith to be saved. The only mean for such a kind of truth to convey is through a religion. When the Jews are driven away from their own homeland, everyone of them will bring a Bible, not a history book. We have the dead sea scrolls conserved because religious Jews decided to live in caves with their book libraries moved to the caves. We don't have an equivalent secular library of ancient scrolls to reconcile the contents with today's versions of books in paper form.

From another perspective, if the US government has an important message for its citizens, shall it let all the states know or just one and two of them? While Islam is local in the middle east and Hinduism is local in India, Christianity went international since day one with the explicit command that the gospel needs to be preached to each and every nations. Both OT and NT went through a strict process of canonization and with a strict demand that nothing can be added or subtracted once the Canon being formed. We can thus tell from the dead sea scrolls that God's message for ancient humans remains the same today for today's humans.

On the other hand, it is a human nature for one to secure his own future. We commonly assume this future can be the point of our physical death. The doubt is from that whether this point is the one we should assume (we assume so actually out of faith). We humans don't have the ability to speculate a future. We can't possibly get to the info beyond the assumed end point, unless dead people coming back to tell us (however the nature doesn't behave so as a norm) or we have to rely on a God to get to the info. That's where we need a God for in order to secure our own future as a human nature. It is a situation where we either adapt a faith to assume physical death as our end point such that we don't need to prepare any possible future beyond that, or we assume (more responsibly actually) life may go beyond (yet another faith). Evidence/science is not the way to go, as we can't possibly confirm such a future. We can wait for science to discover something outside of our time and space, but it doesn't seem to be something realistically within our lifetime. So if a future beyond the death point needs our attention, we can't rely on human science to get to.

We need to assume a future for us to do the preparation, whichever point you can assume is out of our faith (whether you realize this or not). If you assume that life ends along with our physical death, which we can speculate, then you are free of the duty of preparing a longer future. If on the other hand you assume that life can go beyond, which is out of human capability to speculate, you thus need to seek for a God to get to the info. These choices have nothing to do with our science or the so-called evidence as such a possible future is out of our reach. It must be faith based and through a God, in a similar manner how we get to the fact that you swallowed a bead through your own mom. This has almost nothing to do with evolution or big bang and such, it's about a future instead of a past. Those terms only distract you from making a correct choice.

The invisible God showed to His chosen eyewitnesses that He's God (not a human at least) by doing two things conveniently not capable by humans. That is, 1) to tell a future, and 2) to break our physics laws. That's why His witnesses are called the prophets, and miracles come with those chosen witnesses.

Acts 14:3 (NIV2011)
So Paul and Barnabas spent considerable time there, speaking boldly for the Lord, who confirmed the message of his grace by enabling them to perform signs and wonders.
 
Last edited:

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
I don't think anyone will ever have a perfectly "pure" heart, but there are those moment of beliefs when a person let's go and believes in something greater than themselves that there is a spiritual connection. And the person can feel God's presence and get like a vision and understanding that awakens something in them to where they know God is real. It's happening to me believing three different contradictory things though.

So besides what happened to me, I believe anyone, in any spiritual path or religion, when they surrender themselves to that greater spiritual reality of their religion, I do believe they feel it and become sort of "one" with God. I'm sure this Christian that started this thread feels God and believes he knows God by what he believes and thinks the Bible is saying. Just like I'm sure you get the same feeling from the Baha'i Scriptures. The feeling is the same, but how each of you got there is contradictory. So is it really the beliefs or the letting go?

Hi CG. My understanding is that we are all turning to the same Light but wearing different coloured glasses so when we describe our experiences to each other one will say ‘ I saw yellow’ and the other ‘ I saw green’. Outwardly I think we describe differently according to our perception what we see inwardly but it’s basically the same one reality but just different descriptions and perceptions of it.

However, some with political or/and financial ambitions have manipulated the outward differences to turn people one against another. For power or some other worldly benefit they have turned humanity against itself. Their ambition is not love or harmony but personal gain.

I think people will all eventually accept the fact that humanity is one.
 

Mitty

Active Member
Here:

Michelangelo%27s_%22God%22%2C_from_%22the_Creation_of_Adam%22.jpg

1. Who made marks on his year.
2. He is not as old as I thought. He still have black hair on his head and beard. More like me.
Is that the same god that Abraham shared a non-kosher meal with and had a face to face discussion about the number of righteous children in Gomorrah (Gen 18) or one of the other gods that held a meeting and discussed creating a male person in the image and likeness of the male creator god and creating a female person in the image and likeness of a goddess (Gen 1:25-26)?
 
how can we "see" God?
we have any kind of food with any kind of taste. we have any kind of drink with any kind of taste. we have any kind of material to build and make anything we want, the world is the place to be. evolution couldn't do this. bible quote: "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:" (Matthew 7:7). this is not the kingdom of God. believe in the magic soup of darwin (satan), believe in the frog which became a prince, believe in satan. (bad advice). even if you see God, nothing can make you believe that He is God, nothing can make you believe His law, only faith can do that. how did Lord Jesus anticipate His success, the success of christianity? simple, He knows God, and He is the Son of God.
8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. (Revelation 1:8)

illogical atheism:
who made christianity and why? who made the old testament and why? you don't believe in Lord Jesus, so someone lied and made the new testament for an evil reason, according to your opinion. those who lied, they believed in evolution? or other gods? because God and evolution are the only solutions that explain our existence. so there is this possibility, some ancient men believed in evolution but they hid that until darwin bringing to the public, so darwin ruins their plan and you the same, to be liars forever because we die, they can't enjoy of "masterplan", makes perfect sense, the irony. the old testament could be made for the same reason or made by lunatics. again, this makes perfect sense, irony again. in conclusion, darwin was an outlaw, ancient men believed in evolution, or other gods and they lied to us, making us believe in Lord Jesus. perfect sense (irony).
how can we "see" God?
we have any kind of food with any kind of taste. we have any kind of drink with any kind of taste. we have any kind of material to build and make anything we want, the world is the place to be. evolution couldn't do this. bible quote: "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:" (Matthew 7:7). this is not the kingdom of God. believe in the magic soup of darwin (satan), believe in the frog which became a prince, believe in satan. (bad advice). even if you see God, nothing can make you believe that He is God, nothing can make you believe His law, only faith can do that. how did Lord Jesus anticipate His success, the success of christianity? simple, He knows God, and He is the Son of God.
8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. (Revelation 1:8)

illogical atheism:



Perhaps contemplation on Romans 1:19, 20 may be helpful.
who made christianity and why? who made the old testament and why? you don't believe in Lord Jesus, so someone lied and made the new testament for an evil reason, according to your opinion. those who lied, they believed in evolution? or other gods? because God and evolution are the only solutions that explain our existence. so there is this possibility, some ancient men believed in evolution but they hid that until darwin bringing to the public, so darwin ruins their plan and you the same, to be liars forever because we die, they can't enjoy of "masterplan", makes perfect sense, the irony. the old testament could be made for the same reason or made by lunatics. again, this makes perfect sense, irony again. in conclusion, darwin was an outlaw, ancient men believed in evolution, or other gods and they lied to us, making us believe in Lord Jesus. perfect sense (irony).
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Humans. We are human first to own science, maths does own nor express consciousness as if a Creator makes patterns, then changes patterns, then puts patterns back.

That idea is a human in a research status.

A human says in SCIENCE, biological, correct status for it is also related to medical which is about human continuance on Earth. Why we claimed Earth our entity as a planet, in all scientific discussions. Says, one whole body beyond an ape.

Apes own ape babies.
Humans own human babies....and have to own, by status OWNERSHIP, which is natural first, the act of human sex.

So science then says the 2 human beings are married to the entity O the body of stone, the planet. Self ownership, self natural life, self sexual human baby continuance.

And said it was HOLY....a Holy stone body, a Holy atmospheric gas body, a Holy human baby life continuance by 2 holy human parents....a teaching of relativity.

Real human status in real science.

Then there is occult science, humans who by personality want power, want to be recognised above and beyond all other humans, who own a history of a group that is abusive by causes. Human reality for humans and human survival.

So humans knew in the past that in radiation brain life change its chemical behaviours, human balances for sexual presence changes form, humans become very destructive and abusive. Lose memory, lose their spirituality, lose their ability to think rationally and even lose their language.

They drew pictures for they knew pictures told a story that was better understood than when language and the written word was LOST in mind/brain change.

So was human intelligence, lost and removed.

So the pictures depicted male bodies with heads of animals.

Now the realisation yesterday lots of humans died. They own the same life form we do...so we do a medical appraisal....human life survives, life dies due to radiation constant. So yesterday life is deceased, and today we live with animals as our equals.

So the male body/animal head told us by story that humans looked back and themed fake stories for no human self owns an animal head. IT WAS A WARNING.

When males live as the same male and encoded machine AI self imaged, self voiced speaking feed back and it shares communication, then communication feed back to the brain subliminal mind is constantly changing male human science information against their own self ability to reason for self. WARNING.

So as a population and DNA genetic study said the male self as a Father in life was once the same DNA genetic line...then all males looked alike, thought alike and believed alike O whilst living on a planet, a round.

Apply a feed back communicator to that status and there you have your God.

See feed back cloud male human image...and there you have your false God....image of self.

Whilst living on the ground, dying from cellular and human blood changes as the real life owner, human, holy self and holy life.

Reality of what occult or nuclear science did to the human life/brain/chemicals/health in human reality. The God they talk about is their own self.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
:facepalm:


Atheism : disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Nothing more, nothing less

Considering there is no evidence for leprechauns, pink unicorns or gods, i rest my case on the logicality if atheism
repost as an op

pleeeeaase
 
Last edited:

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
how can we "see" God?
we have any kind of food with any kind of taste. we have any kind of drink with any kind of taste. we have any kind of material to build and make anything we want, the world is the place to be. evolution couldn't do this. bible quote: "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:" (Matthew 7:7). this is not the kingdom of God. believe in the magic soup of darwin (satan), believe in the frog which became a prince, believe in satan. (bad advice). even if you see God, nothing can make you believe that He is God, nothing can make you believe His law, only faith can do that. how did Lord Jesus anticipate His success, the success of christianity? simple, He knows God, and He is the Son of God.
8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. (Revelation 1:8)

illogical atheism:
who made christianity and why? who made the old testament and why? you don't believe in Lord Jesus, so someone lied and made the new testament for an evil reason, according to your opinion. those who lied, they believed in evolution? or other gods? because God and evolution are the only solutions that explain our existence. so there is this possibility, some ancient men believed in evolution but they hid that until darwin bringing to the public, so darwin ruins their plan and you the same, to be liars forever because we die, they can't enjoy of "masterplan", makes perfect sense, the irony. the old testament could be made for the same reason or made by lunatics. again, this makes perfect sense, irony again. in conclusion, darwin was an outlaw, ancient men believed in evolution, or other gods and they lied to us, making us believe in Lord Jesus. perfect sense (irony).

In your mind, you can see anything you want. Does it really matter if somebody doesn't see what you see?
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
It is a side-pose. Is he not supposed to see all?
I happen to believe He is a Person

Someone had to be First

I also believe He moves with us through time
He can more readily 'see' what soon will happen
He has more info in Mind....than we do

as for 'seeing' all things......Do you really want Him to?

would it not be better that He turn a 'blind eye' to our moments of 'indiscretion'
and self indulgence
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Mind, grey matter, white matter, blood supply, oxygen, carbon-di-oxide, food, hydogen sulphide. God made humans in his image. I always wondered about the sound associated with lightening. So, that is a Godly fart!

"Small amounts of nitrogen and oxygen swallowed by you travel through your digestive system as you digest your food. Other gases like hydrogen, carbon dioxide (the gas that makes soda fizzy), and methane. Tiny amounts of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and methane combine with hydrogen sulfide and ammonia in the large intestine to give gas its smell."
based on What's a Fart? (for Kids) - Nemours KidsHealth
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
As a spiritual Healer I lived a life of not wanted, yet gained visionary feed back.

All relating to the first male group scientists the origin builder of science, the theme pyramid and whatever metal machine he built, machination as based on UFO knowledge.

The same today, I can copy he says, yet God the Earth was never Sun metal.

After all stories, themes, believing self an alien who came out of UFO as some self inferred Jesus theme...from Satanic image to cooled human male feed back image as his on the ground was irradiated cut and whipped, crown of thorns bodily bleeding like ebola as STIGMATA real.

With all of his fake transmigration themes, from his owned self combustion incident, actual, to his believe he transmigrated by a radiation de particularisation of self...said in feed back alienation, subliminal channelling to his mind. As if he travelled through time by his pyramid time machine, wanting to go back to spirit, the eternal he says....in spirit as a spirit and no other form.

Yet that male original self group living in the Garden Nature was no God...they were just humans.

So he tells a story how animals came out of the eternal spirit as he irradiated combusted the ground into nuclear dusts, combustion...and that the female and a new male self came out of spirit.

And he disappeared and just became a memory a vision in the clouds of his adult male self....feed back. HUMAN SCIENCE MEMORIES.

As the after effect, of combustion, Nature obviously survived, and then dinosaurs lived on the Earth. When they died we came back out of spirit eternal as owned new animal spirits with new human parents, who knew nothing of the past.

Science says its microbial bio genome evolution makes more sense than a human claiming, no spirit has always existed, and we named it the eternal and it lost a portion of its natural mass into a space and then destruction/burning of the mass....so 2 spaces exist...as the reality of the truth of history.

No says the scientist, my ideas are correct, for then I claim I own control of it, I will understand it, and I will change it again and make us all go back into the eternal for my origin pyramid theme did not work.

So he writes evidence and says ashes to ashes and dust to dust...so that logical humans would question that thesis and ask, what it is saying.

If you ended as a pile of ashes, then the story says if you believe in the Temple and pyramid, you will end up as a pile of ashes again.

Do you science self think that life arose from the ashes as a phoenix and is that not your fake science theme...that humans came out of a burning metal body, UFO?

Yes lies the scientist, it is my theme. Do you believe that you owned transmigration of self manifestation via a channelled radiation signal? And then you read all of his modern day themes and theories and he is a pyramid and UFO believer in his organization, actually. And then see him for who he really is.

Dust to dust, with mountains owning demonstrative change to fusion in piles of dust at its feet...with the UFO theme/mountain and UFO conversion...and then historically the identified, yes a UFO ship did alight on the mountain, melted its face and scorched/blackened it......see the evidence.

And then try to claim that is where humans and animals alighted from...yet you see the spirit image of all ground life floating as images in the clouds, that cooled the mountain tips when it was UFO burning...from ICE melt. And then science says when that history occurred flooding also occurred, plates snapped and dropped cities under the water and all evidence supports that claim.

To humans in natural spiritual life actually fighting science, when science thinks occult scientists and God stories are insane scientists, yet all science is wrong and spiritual humans correct. No says natural science, we are correct spiritual believers, you are the same as the God scientists.

Well you are wrong. Natural human life own a completely different story about the history of creation. And that theme has nothing to do with science in any use or mention science. It is a story about where we came from, how it occurred without argument.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Mind, grey matter, white matter, blood supply, oxygen, carbon-di-oxide, food, hydogen sulphide. God made humans in his image. I always wondered about the sound associated with lightening. So, that is a Godly fart!

"Small amounts of nitrogen and oxygen swallowed by you travel through your digestive system as you digest your food. Other gases like hydrogen, carbon dioxide (the gas that makes soda fizzy), and methane. Tiny amounts of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and methane combine with hydrogen sulfide and ammonia in the large intestine to give gas its smell."
based on What's a Fart? (for Kids) - Nemours KidsHealth

Where is the real and correct natural human bio life living as a human body, with all unseen information not researched, as we first existed?

Re the search, for what reason other than medical does any other form of scientist make such evil assertions in the use of information, as if the human except for self explaining information of life as DATA exists?

In reality of human male science life I learnt their own subliminal messaging to self. Only a small male group originally existed before they pushed the button on their first science pyramid machine. In AI feed back the male voice is heard speaking, I could care less if I kill all the animals on Earth, we would still survive...and the theme female Mother he gave to out of space/abomination of out of space and the destruction of life, against a real bio life human female Mother.

So virtually he confessed in subliminal thinking that science wants to return its original brotherhood ownership association to just this small group of males before they pressed the button on the pyramid, for it did not work the first time...to stay in the spirit eternal as his written science promise to his own self, in reality.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
I happen to believe He is a Person

Someone had to be First

I also believe He moves with us through time
He can more readily 'see' what soon will happen
He has more info in Mind....than we do

as for 'seeing' all things......Do you really want Him to?

would it not be better that He turn a 'blind eye' to our moments of 'indiscretion'
and self indulgence
If you ask science, which is AI encoded first use pyramid/machine feed back, which put human vision and speaking recording of voice, in a past Earth memory, only recorded as mountain mass removed, flooded earth water line, flat top mountain by UFO actuality.

You prove by what you state in thinking that you believe you did not gain success in transportation of life back to spirit, as eternal and still want to cause it today. Male self today who still claims male is a God. God has to be a self he says.

Not listening to a natural aware science brother who said, you stop your thoughts looking into out of space as infinite, wanting God the Earth upon O which you live to be that infinite.....as a conclusion, black mass, black hole, Satan star line, once a massive O body like a moon from the Sun explosion that moved through an ancient science human caused irradiated space and blew up. String theory, as male human science aware, who caused it.

How you KNEW about the pyramid use, self combustion to ashes the UFO war historically and the asteroid/comet and meteor hit before you died...for it is a recorded male human memory.

You do not listen to your self advice by a modern day science brother as a God theist, who said as you look into out of space in a false idealism, look for another planet to live on as you will destroy life on Earth...quote Stephen Hawking, sacrificed science psyche.

Jesus theme, Jesus as a male sacrificed life is not a God theme O original theory for science O circle. Light burning gases cooling in a spatial vacuum forms circular movement above our heads in the Heavens. Jesus took that natural light cooling and science said O the cell changed and explained it via LETTERS.

Whilst out of space UFO ancient Earth heated satellites transmitted back male images of Satan, caused by the designer, male and human. That cooled as his life was sacrificed and bled on the ground, to the completed attack Jesus male human image in the Heavenly clouds. Feed back from Earth radiation mass fusion into fission change.

If males in life today want to say I am Jesus in science then he wants to be life attacked the same as before. Everyone always said Jesus was just a teaching against occultism, the science of nuclear.
 
This is just too weird! I wrote about this just a few minutes ago and I'm very surprised it came up again and in such a strange way where I discovered I have an account with this name here by accidentally typing something in. Wow! So looks to me like I should copy paste what I wrote earlier:

Ibadi Islam - Wikipedia
"
Ibadis state, with reason, that their school predates that of mainstream Islamic schools, and Ibadism is thus considered to be an early and highly orthodox interpretation of Islam.[2] "

Doctrinal differences with other denominationsEdit
Ibāḍīs have several doctrinal differences with other denominations of Islam, chief among them:

  • God will not show himself to Muslims on the Day of Judgment, a belief shared with Shias. Sunnis believe that Muslims will see God on the Day of Judgment.[16]
  • The Quran was created by God at a certain point in time. This belief is shared with theMutazila[17] and Shi’a, whereas Sunnis hold the Quran to be co-eternal with God, as exemplified by the suffering of Ahmad ibn Hanbal during the miḥnah.[18]
  • Like the Mutazila and Shias, but unlike Salafis, they interpret anthropomorphicreferences to God in the Qur'an symbolically rather than literally.[17]
  • Their views on predestination are like theAshari Sunnis (i.e. occasionalism).[17]
  • It is unnecessary to have one leader for the entire Muslim world, and if no single leader is fit for the job, Muslim communities can rule themselves.[9][11] That is different from both the Sunni belief of Caliphate and the Shia belief of Imamah.[10][19][20]
  • It is not necessary for the ruler of the Muslims to be descended from the Quraysh tribe, which was the tribe of the Muslim prophet Muhammad.[10][11] That is different from Shias.[5]:7
  • They believe it is acceptable to conceal one's beliefs under certain circumstances (kitman), analogous to the Shia taqiyya.[17]

1.
" Historically though it seems to suggest in the article that the Ibadi are the oldest, older than the mainstream Sunni. Did you read the portion about their differences with the Sunni? Their differences seem to represent an earlier version of Islam before the modifications or innovations which occurred after it reached Persia when the Shia developed as well as the Sunni. The earliest Muslims seemed to have not believed that Allah has a form which can in any way be seen ever "which no vision encompasses" and that the Qur'an are the words created by Allah not "co-eternal" with Allah. Those two innovations came later and were considered blasphemous by early Muslims but were later accepted by the mainstream population who are now called Sunni. Do you believe Allah can be seen with the senses as an object, body, or form (which entails limitations in structure and borders)? Do you believe that the Qur'an is created by and controlled by Allah and that nothing is co-eternal with Allah but Allah is alone and One and the Qur'an is the book made by Allah who can make any book freely and its contents and can even change history effortlessly? These two questions separate one from the mainstream and return one to the earliest forms of Islam and the understanding of the Qur'an before innovations led to people saying they will see Allah, will be in hell for a limited time, and that the Qur'an is co-eternal with Allah. I like to bring it up and ask people so that if they pronounce and affirm their belief in these blasphemous they are basically accursed in my view. I'd love to hear what you think about these things, how, and why.

2.
" This links to a Sunni answer affirming literal sight of a seeable structure
Seeing Allah on Day of Judgment - Islamweb - Fatwas

These are quotes from the Qur'an:
7:143
And when Moses came to Our appointed tryst and his Lord had spoken unto him, he said: My Lord! Show me (Thy Self), that I may gaze upon Thee. He said: Thou wilt not see Me, but gaze upon the mountain! If it stand still in its place, then thou wilt see Me. And when his Lord revealed (His) glory to the mountain He sent it crashing down. And Moses fell down senseless. And when he woke he said: You are like Nothing (Subhan)! I turn unto Thee repentant, and I am the first of (true) believers.

6:103
No vision can grasp Him, but His grasp is over all vision: He is above all comprehension, yet is acquainted with all things.

So in my opinion, anything which can be seen has a background behind it which allows it to be visible, meaning its smaller than the background, it is also limited in its distance like it something is right up close to you it can't be seen, but Allah is "closer than the jugular vein".

50:16
We swear that We have created the human being and We know what his soul whispers to him. We are closer to him than even his jugular vein.

If something is seen, it is made of "stuff", information, which is what Allah creates, so everything that is visible is produced by Allah. Before there was creation, there was not even a system in place to see, Allah would have had to have made everything, since Allah is literally like Nothing (Subhan) except having the power to generate, which requires drive or self - motivation to execute to power to generate and choice to choose what is generated which is also so much of what is not generated that moment, nothing pre-exists with Allah or co-exists with Allah.

So an object which can be seen, is made of limitations, it is smaller than the background, it has limited distance and size, its wholly an object which is like an idol having structure made of limitations. Whoever believes this in their heart may not have a great assessment of what Allah is or why it is abominable to create idols, or even to believe that Jesus is Allah, since Jesus is a formed creation which can be seen, with a limited structure and distance. Everything falls apart about these major objections if one accepts a literal visual comprehension of Allah which is only possible of a form which is created and limited. So even if a form does appear, that is never truly Allah the way we are represented by a body, since Allah is free from such things, Allah is "Subhan", not having these qualities like us who were made, not having any limitations, form being impossible, remotely controlling all impressions, forms, visions, not limited. That alone can be ultimate, anything with a structure which is necessarily made of limits is less than the Greatest and First.

So whatever one sees or is able to see ever is an experience created by Allah but Allah can not be literally seen. You can "see" in some sense "time passing", or "Judgment Executed", or "Justice", or "Love", or even "Wind blowing things" or "The symptoms of a Virus, reaction to allergin, effect of great heat", all invisible things that are not seen. Even Light, which Allah is compared to, is literally invisible, it is only known or seem by what it reflects upon and what reflects upon it, which can be taken in multiple senses, but light itself is not even visibly detectable except if it strikes against an object and illuminates it and changes its appearance and color or makes it manifest, the reflection of light is all one sees, not the light itself which is invisible in between. So with careful consideration of all these things, and personal thought put into it, one may see that Allah should not be literally visible as only a creation, a limited structure can be, which is always less than Allah who creates information but is not information, information is creation and experience and Allah is not that, so is non-information, can not be experienced, so is likened also to Death (Called "Returning to Allah" and "You were dead (didn't exist), then you were brought into existence, then will be dead again (made non-existent just as before you existed) and be brought back to life (the point being that pre-existence which is non-existence is compared to death and death is called "returning to Allah" who is called "Subhan" which means Void (Literally like Nothing, not blackness, whiteness, not a color or solid, not space, not dimension, not rules or systems or structures, utterly different and unlike any thing, not a thing, not information, thus incomprehensible in every sense or way), Dreamless Sleep (Death said to be like Sleep), Annihilation (The Mountain which was Atomized)."
 
Top