Psalm 110 is part of the Old Testament, the Tanakh. It was written in HebrewSorry, I have not read the Bible in Hebrew, although most people believe it was originally in Greek. Was the New Testament Written in Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Psalm 110 is part of the Old Testament, the Tanakh. It was written in HebrewSorry, I have not read the Bible in Hebrew, although most people believe it was originally in Greek. Was the New Testament Written in Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek?
You are right. Matthew was just quoting the Old Testament. But that does not mean YHWH is referred to in the New Testament.Psalm 110 is part of the Old Testament, the Tanakh. It was written in Hebrew
Your mockery of his use of parentheses is out of line. He is simply placing in parenthesis the translation. It is a perfectly legitimate use of parentheses.Did they have parenthesis at the time of Jesus?
Referred to, yes. Mentioned by name? No.You are right. Matthew was just quoting the Old Testament. But that does not mean YHWH is referred to in the New Testament.
Yes, Yhwh is referred to many times in the NT, as the evil one. Even the Lord's prayer hints of Yhwh.Referred to, yes. Mentioned by name? No.
No it could very well be referring to some other 'Lord'Referred to, yes. Mentioned by name? No.
You can't quote something by adding to it right in the middle - it is deceptive.Your mockery of his use of parentheses is out of line. He is simply placing in parenthesis the translation. It is a perfectly legitimate use of parentheses.
As "the evil one"? No, the NT never promotes the idea that the God of the Jews is evil.Yes, Yhwh is referred to many times in the NT, as the evil one. Even the Lord's prayer hints of Yhwh.
No, not in the context that it is used.No it could very well be referring to some other 'Lord'
No, it's not. The whole point of the parentheses or brackets is to communicate that you are momentarily breaking from the quote to make a comment.You can't quote something by adding to it right in the middle - it is deceptive.
In the Old Testament YHWH is "Father" in the sense of the Creator.The Bible does not support YHWH as the FATHER. It does however support him as the Adversary.
His question to Adam "Where are you?" was for Adam to realize his new degraded state - hiding from fellowship with God.He lied to Adam and Eve.
Adam and Eve could hear YHWH moving about so they hid.
The question was designed for Adam and Eve to contemplate the tragic change that was taking place in them - hiding in fear from their Creator.YHWH could not find Adam and Eve?
As Jesus is God as a man manifested so also God appeared as a man to Adam and Eve.Adam and Eve come out from hiding to greet YHWH. It doesn't specifically say, but one can gather that it was face to face. Jesus says more than once that no man has seen the FATHER.
If you wish to be thorough you have to admit that Jesus also said that to see Him was to see the Father.Jacob seen YHWH face to face, even wrestled him. Again, Jesus says more than once no man has seen the FATHER.
The process of death began to operate from the center of their being gradually working its dearful final result outward.But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Genesis 2:17
They did not die, they went on to live for hundred of years. YHWH also tempted them by planting it there in the first place. At the time, Adam and Eve had the mentality of a toddler. They didn't even know they were naked.
So sorry I do not meet your standards of rectitude. BTW any added text while quoting should be in brackets not parenthesis: Extended Rules for Using Quotation Marks - Purdue OWL® - Purdue UniversityYou are way out of line with your objection. If you want to debate him about his ideas, that is fine. But it looks very bad for you to be picking apart his use of punctuation, especially when he is punctuating correctly. If after everything I have pointed out, you want to continue mocking, that's on you. Just be aware of how it looks to others.
Yes brackets are more correct. However, using parentheses instead does not diminish the communication. No one reading his comment misunderstands him.So sorry I do not meet your standards of rectitude. BTW any added text while quoting should be in brackets not parenthesis: Extended Rules for Using Quotation Marks - Purdue OWL® - Purdue University
His question to Adam "Where are you?" was for Adam to realize his new degraded state - hiding from fellowship with God.
His question was not because He did not know where Adam was.
I would not take Gen. 2:17b - " . . . for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die." to insist within that 24 hour period.
The dreadful process started then. God did inform Adam he would eat bread in sweat for some period.
That would mean that YHWH murdered them, slowly, for over 900 or so yrs. Kind of cruel really. I guess us modern ppl are lucky, we get a quicker sentence.The process of death began to operate from the center of their being gradually working its dearful final result outward.
Since then everyone born begins immediately to die in like manner. Emptiness, vanity, darkness of conscience, aging, and eventual
decreptitude of the body all were "calling cards" informing Adam he was DYING.
I would not take Gen. 2:17b - " . . . for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die." to insist within that 24 hour period.
The dreadful process started then. God did inform Adam he would eat bread in sweat for some period.
Cursed is the ground because of you; / In toil will you eat of it / All the days of your life. (Gen. 3:17b)
@teageYes, Yhwh is referred to many times in the NT, as the evil one. Even the Lord's prayer hints of Yhwh.
Some Gnostic Christians considered the Hebrew God of the Old Testament as the evil, false god and creator of the material universe. They believe the Father of Jesus Christ, the Unknown God of the Gospel and creator of the spiritual world, is the true, good God.As "the evil one"? No, the NT never promotes the idea that the God of the Jews is evil.
9 Or what man is there of you, whom if his son ask bread, will he give him a stone? 10 Or if he ask a fish, will he give him a serpent? 11 If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to them that ask him?As "the evil one"? No, the NT never promotes the idea that the God of the Jews is evil.
Yes, in the Lord's prayer, Jesus addresses it to the God of Israel. Even though he doesn't mention YHWH by name, that is who "our father" is. There is nothing in that prayer that states or even implies that "our father" is evil.
If I'm to be extremely honest, I don't know yet. I prayed for guidance and better understanding while going through some very difficult times and now everything looks different. Thats all I know. I used to have main stream views. It feels like searching all over again from scratch.@teage
Are you Gnostic?
Some Gnostic Christians, such as Marcionites, considered the Hebrew God of the Old Testament as the evil, false god and creator of the material universe, and the Unknown God of the Gospel, the father of Jesus Christ and creator of the spiritual world, as the true, good God.
Yaldabaoth
@IndigoChild5559
Have you read The Gospel of Judas?
@teageIf I'm to be extremely honest, I don't know yet. I prayed for guidance and better understanding while going through some very difficult times and now everything looks different. Thats all I know. I used to have main stream views. It feels like searching all over again from scratch.