Mohammad Nur Syamsu
Well-Known Member
This is one of the biggest crocks of garbage I have ever read. There is no argument here--only the merest smears and slanders against people who don't share your scientifically illiterate views.
First, there is NOTHING in evolutionary theory that dictates any prescriptivist doctrine of any kind. So it is unsurprising that your mere assertion to the contrary is backed up by NOTHING in the biological literature regarding natural selection and genetic drift.
Second, it is the merest metaphysical prejudice to suppose that certain configurations matter cannot love or that materialist philosophy, which does not follow from any scientific theory, rejects emotions as in any way insignificant or unreal.
On a related point, the notion that social darwinism follows from evolutionary theory is false. The chains of inference that might relate the two simply don't exist.
As far as I can tell, you are merely parroting religious fundamentalist rhetoric. That's why I have lost interest in your posts.
One just has to interpret the language of natural selection theory as metaphorical, that organisms struggle competitively for reproductive succes, that they would love life, survival, reproduction. If you take it as fact then it is social darwinism. But evolutionists don't care to admit the language is metaphore. There is no place for subjectivity in materialism at all, obviously. The existence of all things material is a matter of fact forced by evidence, not opinion. On a practical level this means in evolutionist colleges emotions are ignored.