• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How did the Egyptians build the pyramids?

We as in people of today. Your ego is too big lol.

If it isn't lost in time and history produce it. Its that simple.
Ya people today includes me, I need a bit of an ego cuz then I'll get lost in yours. My ego is too big? It's the size it's supposed to be, thinking you can talk for what my ego should be like is very egotistical of you.

Why would i produce the methods of building the pyramkds when I wasn't rhe one who made them, if you want the evidence you go get it, doesn't concern me
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Ya people today includes me, I need a bit of an ego cuz then I'll get lost in yours. My ego is too big? It's the size it's supposed to be, thinking you can talk for what my ego should be like is very egotistical of you.

Why would i produce the methods of building the pyramkds when I wasn't rhe one who made them, if you want the evidence you go get it, doesn't concern me
If you say so lol
 
@cladking does that a lot. If you disagree with him, he would lump along with everyone else, as being “siding” with the enemies - the Egyptologists.

He has great hatred & hostility towards Egyptology, as if every individual Egyptologists are the same.

He believed that Egyptologists are all involved in some conspiracies, especially control all Peer Review publishers, even Peer Review that have nothing to do with Egyptology, like biology, physics, astronomy. So he hates all Peer Review, even those that have absolutely nothing to do with Egyptology or ancient Egypt, nothing to do with pyramids.
Sadly this forum is filled with those like him. I feel like those like him usually crave being humbled but most aren't willing to let it happen just yet. So many people like him will say stuff like I'm just hear to learn and have an open mind yet you'll see them in 7 years arguing the same stance with the same reasoning
 

gnostic

The Lost One
Sadly this forum is filled with those like him. I feel like those like him usually crave being humbled but most aren't willing to let it happen just yet. So many people like him will say stuff like I'm just hear to learn and have an open mind yet you'll see them in 7 years arguing the same stance with the same reasoning

He reminds me of pseudo-historians and pseudo-archaeologists, like Graham Hancock, Robert Bauval, & Erich von Daniken.
 
Im actually not playing on it. Well for one I'm well calculated about important things such as that. For two who wants to be responsible.. when someone asks who is responsible for this you would just raise your hand ?
 

We Never Know

No Slack
But i would add that replying to somebody who is doing something irresponsible which could trigger them to an accident from checking your reply is irresponsible too
Ah. So you are online at a social media site chatting with people while your are driving but if you have an accident its the fault of the people replying to you? lmfao!
I am beginning to doubt you are even old enough to drive.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
We can guess, speculate, assume, and even try to duplicate the way we think they did but how they actually did it is lost in time and history.
This is a vague "Arguing from Ignorance" fantasy speculation of what we do know and not know about the construction of the pyramids.

Posts #248 and 249 outline most of the discoveries and research involving the pyramids,. Today they have duplicated many of the methods and engineering of the pyramids, Yes, there are still unanswered questions as in all sciences and understanding of ancient history, but this is not an argument against what is known today concerning the pyramids,

The references do contain a lot of references to the physical nature of the pyramids and their construction in direct contradiction to the claims of @cladking and @GoodAttenti These ar actual physical observed properties, and not speculative or academic conclusions, .
 
This is a vague "Arguing from Ignorance" fantasy speculation of what we do know and not know about the construction of the pyramids.

Posts #248 and 249 outline most of the discoveries and research involving the pyramids,. Today they have duplicated many of the methods and engineering of the pyramids, Yes, there are still unanswered questions as in all sciences and understanding of ancient history, but this is not an argument against what is known today concerning the pyramids,

The references do contain a lot of references to the physical nature of the pyramids and their construction in direct contradiction to the claims of @cladking and @GoodAttenti These ar actual physical observed properties, and not speculative or academic conclusions, .
After reading some of your posts my advice to you would be... stick to asking and learning not preaching. Sad to see someone talk in statements with so many falsehoods spread throughout, lose the ego
 

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
507c. effervescent, proceeding from leg and tail of the Great (One) who is in splendour.
508a. N. is come to his watercourses, which are in the land of the flood, in Mḥ.t-wr.t,

692c. He is effervescent; he is effervescent; Shu, let thy arms be about N.

868b. thy water, thy cool water-libation is the inundation of the Great One (who) which is come forth from thee.

22a. This is thy cool water, Osiris; this is thy cool water, O N., which went forth from thy son, which went forth from Horus.

1553b. They tremble who see the inundation (when) it tosses;
1554a. (but) the marshes laugh; the shores are become green;
1554b. the divine offerings descend; the face of men brightens; the heart of the gods rejoices.

The builders said many times where the water came from; an effervescent cool water source that tosses on the Giza Plateau.

They even said what caused it to toss;

2109. The sky trembles, the earth quakes before the god, before N.
2110a. N. [is not enveloped] by the earth;
2110b. ’Iḫ.t-wt.t, thou art not enveloped by the earth.
2110c. Thy fame is by day; thy fear is by night, as a god, lord of fear.

It was "’Iḫ.t-wt.t," that caused it to toss. This word means "risings begetter" because it caused bread to rise, foam on beer to rise, and Osiries to stand at Giza.

We can't see it but it's still carbon dioxide.
Yesterday when I read this topic and tried to figure out a new way to move large stones, easier, the first idea that came to mind was connected to CO2. Limestone is made of Calcium carbonate, which when treated with a mineral acid will give off CO2.

The image that popped into my mind was CO2 based stone levitation. We push the large stones over a layer of fine clay soaked with mineral acid. The damp clay itself is very slippery when wet, with the CO2 generation adding some extra lift to the slip. As the stone moves to the top, the bottom of the stone will be polished by the acid, and fine clay friction, for increasing CO2 lift.

Another way could be done with sand as a counter weight. The large stone would be attached to a counter weight container, that will be filled with sand. The slaves will only have to carry bags of sand up the ramp, to fill the container, until the container reaches the needed weight, and then the stone begins to move up the ramp. The slaves keep adding sand until the stone reaches the milestone.

The counter weight container would then be designed, so the sand can be drained out the bottom. The only heavy object to move is the empty sand container, back the top, using the same rope as the stone. These slaves and animals are going downhill, until the container goes back to the top to be refilled. A cubic foot of sand is close to a cubic foot of solid stone or about 100 pound/ft3. One or two trips per cubic foot of sand per slave gets 100 pound in the counter weight.
 

cladking

Well-Known Member
Scientist DO NOT believe the stones are fit together with optical precision. They are fit together with gypsum mortar and some slurry mortar,
Misinformation abounds unabated in your posts,

As I said before Petrie was the last real scientist over there. It was HE Himself who said they were fit with "optical precision".

The mortar used in the pyramids has been tested extensively

To my knowledge some of it has. But I don't believe this is true for each type. If you have any data I'd be interested.

Data is what's missing in Egyptology. They throw very little science at the pyramid and it's very haphazardly and poorly recorded or reported.

Hawass just shove a boroscope in one of the thermal anomalies and didn't even publish photos or admit he had.

Unbelievably false with more misinformation without competent scientific references. Your C14 claims are bogus/

Check again. The C14 results that proved they are wrong led them to invent the "old wood" theory which holds the wood used was centuries old. And when they invented it they didn't even know the C14 is fixed when it forms and I had to tell them.

Yes your crying and throwing stones will not change the science behind our understanding of the pyramids as extensively referenced in posts #248 and #249, which totally contradicts your mythical nonsense.

You have nothing but internet sources that are wrong.
 
Top