In a study, college students were presented a chance to solve a question on the white board. During the time they had to solve the problem, they were yelled at by other students an incorrect answer.If that was really the case, one of two things must be going on:
- God wanted us to accept the offer. Our failure to accept it implies that God was incapable of convincing us.
- God knew his attempts would fail, but he didn't seriously expect us to accept it.
Which is it?
A good portion of the study group admitted to knowing the answer but failing to write it because everyone (peer pressure?).
I have watched adults reject anything another said simply because it is not the answer they came up with after being presented a question. I myself, as a soccer ref., has explained outright what rules are for the game.
Yet still have had plenty argue themselves to be g right when they were blatantly incorrect or improbable to even seeing what has transpired. Some players have lied through their teeth to say they did not commit a foul.
Why are there only two outcomes presented when there are other logical outcomes that may still occur?