That's actually a misconception between paradigms.
Yes it is and the misconception of other paradigms also include misconceptions involving the Baha'i Faith. There is a wide range of the human view of the belief in what is true and exclusive of their belief system. and a biased position of one;s faith in respect to those who believe differently is the rule not the exception. In my view Jews, Christians and Muslims make the strongest claims of exclusiveness than other religions.
In Hinduism, many belief systems are considered valid, on par with each other. There is no compulsion to have one size fit all. Yes, my belief system works for me. But others are equally valid, and may well work for others, like Baha'i for you, or Amadhiya Islam for Paarsurrey. This core belief, in part, is what makes Hindus in general so tolerant.
This is a generalization that does not necessarily apply to any religion. There are, indeed, aggressive nationalist Hindus that have strong exclusive beliefs just like other religions.
Tolerance varies from the human perspective and is a poor measure of how tolerant a religion is as a whole.
So it's an extrapolation out from your own belief.
True, but this is a very human problem common to all religions including Hinduism, which like all religions considers their beliefs more true than other religions and even divisions within Hinduism
Very few people on this forum would know much about my belief at all. We don't share that much.
I believe this is a the same problem concerning the Baha'i Faith. I do not believe this problem is valid in describing one religion in respect to another based on the human perspective.
I still object to the original post citing a yes/no wager.