dybmh
ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
That contradicts Deuteronomy 13:1-2.And what if God reveals Himself in a new form that's better and you have to recognize Him?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That contradicts Deuteronomy 13:1-2.And what if God reveals Himself in a new form that's better and you have to recognize Him?
No, not nice.How... nice?
And what if God reveals Himself in a new form that's better and you have to recognize Him?
That contradicts Deuteronomy 13:1-2.
What if they claim it's the real God?That contradicts Deuteronomy 13:1-2.
The true essence of God is impossible for humans to describe not sure we even should try to explain God to other human beings because their understanding or wisdom about God would be different than our own.
Yes, i would say that is a good way to gain better understanding.Maybe we can consider that it is OK to freely talk with each other, as to where we gained that understanding or knowledge, and freely discuss what source of "Widsom" we have used?
Regards Tony
If it's a God who is unknown, a God who takes a form then that would be a disqualifier.What if they claim it's the real God?
Why would ordinary people want to do that? I understand why con men like Joseph Smith or crazy people like Jim Jones do it and why they are successful but I'm a bad liar and couldn't do it.Now Christianity and Islam have spread all over the world. Why? If the Prophets were just ordinary people like you and I then we should be able to replicate everything they did, change civilisation and acquire billions of followers. Can any of us do that? If so then do it and if not why not?
I confess, it's an assumption on my part. A magical pixies is VERY mysterious, so I can't be sure.If its "Incomprehensible", how do you know that "it must be magic"?
What if the God seems more like your God than the one before?If it's a God who is unknown, a God who takes a form then that would be a disqualifier.
Deuteronomy 4:12 And the LORD spoke to you out of the fire. You heard the sound of the words, but saw no form; there was only a voice.
Deuteronomy 4:26 I call heaven and earth as witnesses against you this day that you will quickly perish from the land that you are crossing the Jordan to possess. You will not live long upon it, but will be utterly destroyed.What if the God seems more like your God than the one before?
What if they claim it's the real God?
When I think of a "prophet" I think of those that are in the Jewish Bible. Now Baha'is have those they consider "manifestations" in all the other religions. But who do Baha'is consider to be prophets in all the other religions other than Judaism? It seems as if we were to take away Judaism out of the progression of religions, Baha'is would lose a lot of people they say are manifestations and prophets. So, for manifestations, we'd have Krishna, Buddha, Zoroaster, Jesus, Muhammad and your two, The Bab and Baha'u'llah. Now could you name some prophets from those religions?The key here is we do need to determine this.
I see the Prophet has no self, but they speak what God has told them to speak.
"He speaketh not as prompted by His own self, but as bidden by Him Who is the All-Knowing, the All-Wise."
Regards Tony
I confess, it's an assumption on my part. A magical pixies is VERY mysterious, so I can't be sure.
So what have we concluded about this 'thought experiment' thus far?
When I think of a "prophet" I think of those that are in the Jewish Bible. Now Baha'is have those they consider "manifestations" in all the other religions. But who do Baha'is consider to be prophets in all the other religions other than Judaism? It seems as if we were to take away Judaism out of the progression of religions, Baha'is would lose a lot of people they say are manifestations and prophets. So, for manifestations, we'd have Krishna, Buddha, Zoroaster, Jesus, Muhammad and your two, The Bab and Baha'u'llah. Now could you name some prophets from those religions?
Well, that makes it easy to know who a real prophet is and who isn't. So, name all the people that had all those qualities and that claimed to be speaking for God and everything they foretold came true.By their fruits you shall know them.
Here are some of those.
Galatians 5:22-2322 "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness and self control.
Against such things there is no law."
Regards Tony
Brother. There is no conclusion at all. With all of these pestering I was only trying to show you that its a baseless argument to put forth pixies, unicorns, spaghetti monsters and flying living creatures saying "its the same as this". I know it's an overly used style of argumentation by many.
As an intellectual person, don't use these arguments even if they are used by very famous people in the world.
Peace.
I stand by my original statement. An unverifiable god is as meaningless as an unverifiable magical pixie.
One unverifiable claim has as much value as any other unverifiable claim. You've said nothing to indicate that it's a baseless argument.