QuestioningMind
Well-Known Member
Nope, I haven't changed it to an unverifiable pixie, it was ALWAYS an unverifiable pixie. Go back and read the post I made that you originally responded to.The problem is, you have changed your so called Magical Pixie to an "unverifiable pixie". And you think that's a great but sly change to suit your agenda. Nice.
So fine. Lets go ahead.
Can you give your definitions of both of these characters?
1. Unverifiable God.
2. What are the arguments you have heard for this unverifiable God.
3. Unverifiable Pixie
4. What are the arguments you have heard for this unverifiable pixie.
Thanks.
My Post:
An unverifiable god is about as meaningful as an unverifiable magical pixie.
Your Response
Actually its not.
Is a magical pixie created or uncreated? Just as a thought experiment. One step at a time.
#91
You've done this before. You start a conversation with me and when you're 'thought experiment' goes nowhere you blatantly lie about what I wrote and accuse me of trying to be 'sly and change the agenda to suit me' when that's exactly what YOU are attempting to do by being blatantly dishonest about what I said.
How shameful.