So what are these ‘fruits’ and how do we know they don’t apply to more than one religion?you know a tree by the fruit it bears
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So what are these ‘fruits’ and how do we know they don’t apply to more than one religion?you know a tree by the fruit it bears
Nice.
So whats your point?
Nope, you're wrong. China doesn't give reference to Jesus. It uses BCE and CE(common era).
the quote I used applies to all people.....each one of usSo what are these ‘fruits’ and how do we know they don’t apply to more than one religion?
So what is common?
Is it really COMMON or is it actually Christian or really Christ.
Do you have a reference link for that?
Or you just desperately invented that so you could squirm out of this, one way or another?
My point is that the Chinese Communist Party doesn't use something blindly as year numbers as references without knowing the freaking reason why.
Qin Shi Huang, previously Zheng, King of Qin, personal name Yíng Zhèng or Zhào Zhèng, was the founder of the Qin dynasty and the first emperor of a unified China. He became China's first emperor when he was 38 after the Qin had conquered all of the other Warring States and unified all of China in 221 BC. Wikipedia
Born: 18 February 259 BC, Handan, China
Died: 10 September 210 BC, Julu Commandery
They could have used the death year of the first emperor of China, Qin Shi Huang - and start from there to here. But they didn't. They have to use the years of our Lord Jesus Christ as references to mark the times of the year, not withstanding they are godless and traditionally Buddhist.
Now is Jesus historical? Have anybody wondered why the heck 1949, 2019 or whatever year your birthday is, stands for?
Common Era - Wikipedia
So I win providing you proofs based on historical facts, and not just trying to make things fit in.
Okay. So its the year of the lord.
SO whats your point?
That is too good to be true and it is not practiced not even with them.
If you will examine the picture below which is an image of the leading newspaper in Taiwan
You will find the date in the upper right hand corner - and it isn't Chinese.
Even Hongkong's South China Morning Post newspaper is using the proper year in reference to the year of our Lord.
Thanks for the link.
Common Era (CE) is one of the notation systems for the world's most widely used calendar era. BCE (Before the Common Era or Before the Current Era) is the era before CE. BCE and CE are alternatives to the Dionysian BC and AD system respectively. The Dionysian era distinguishes eras using BC ("before Christ") and AD (anno Domini, "in [the] year of [the] Lord")
In the later 20th century, the use of CE and BCE was popularized in academic and scientific publications as a culturally neutral term. It is also used by some authors and publishers who wish to emphasize sensitivity to non-Christians by not explicitly referencing Jesus as "Christ" and Dominus ("Lord") through use of the abbreviation[c] "AD".
Dionysius labeled the column of the table in which he introduced the new era as "Anni Domini Nostri Jesu Christi".
Common Era is really Christian / Christ Era. Your link provided the answer and the truth. It was a desperate at defining the "C" - they could have gone for cuteness era for all you know. Now it is too lame to use the word Common, why is there a Before Common Era? What is that? What is obvious in between that is Jesus Christ, himself.
You proved my point - CHRIST is a historical person. Yay, you win!
The point is Jesus Christ is Lord and that's in the Bible.
Acts 2:36 New International Version (NIV)
“Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Messiah.”
How do we know the Bible was not written by demons?
I know I know, because they don’t exist.
But suppose if you believed in demons and believed that demons can impersonate the dead.
Demons could have stolen Lazuras body and impersonated him, and the same for Jesus, or Jesus Himself could even be a demon in league with other demons.
So Jesus Christ is the lord based on the "Year of the Lord"! Thats your evidence for Jesus being "The Lord"? Do all calendars make the one named after the "Lord"?
Not my own evidence.
Everybody knows it, except a few.
It is in your average dictionary and encyclopedia.
in the year of our Lord
Definition of in the year of our Lord
formal
—used before a year to say that it is after the birth of Jesus Christ
The couple married on this day in the year of our Lord 1954.
Definition of IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD.
The terms anno Domini (AD) and before Christ (BC)[note 1] are used to label or number years in the Julian and Gregorian calendars. The term anno Domini is Medieval Latin and means "in the year of the Lord",[1] but is often presented using "our Lord" instead of "the Lord",[2][3] taken from the full original phrase "anno Domini nostri Jesu Christi", which translates to "in the year of our Lord Jesus Christ".
Anno Domini - Wikipedia
You are cherry picking history here, for example you are ignoring Christian Rome which persecuted and oppressed pagans Persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire - Wikipedia and Roman taxes were still high when the English went to war with the Romans.We know that it isn't so by the same reason we know Christianity isn't an evil religion. "You shall know them by their fruits," Jesus says.
So, we have history lessons. Roman polytheism caused oppression and crucifixion among mant of its citizens. High taxes, big state, etc.
So when it comes to religion you want us to focus on Denmark Norway and Sweden, but when it comes to secular governments you want us to ignore the modern governments in similar regions?We know that Norse polytheism was a warrior cult, and the Vikings spent most of their time raiding and looting. We know that during the Dark Ages, much of their energy was spent on Crusades vs Islam. So we see this long bad period, and decide it must be because of Christianity's influence. But to the north, we have Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland.
But does it decline because the Vikings have started to settle or because they are Christianised? From your Wikipedia article on Scandinavian Christianisation;Remember those Vikings? Well, after conversion to Christianity, we compare the general History of Scandinavia with the Christianization of Scandinavia.
Christianization of Scandinavia - Wikipedia
History of Scandinavia - Wikipedia
Around 8th century, they started Christianizing. Around this time, these Vikings gradually stopped raiding and started settling. Not only that, the number of wars seems to decline.
It is not correct to pretend that all secular states are either Communist or Nazi states. What about the fruits of countries such as Sweden which is amongst the most secular countries in Europe....Meanwhile, in the last 100+ years, we've got to see the fruits of a secular society. Two World Wars. A Holocaust. Communism killing people in Germany, China, Russia, and South East Asia. And the results of globalism aren't pretty. Open borders helped spread COVID-19. Thanks, but uhhh I think we'll stick with having religion.
By the way, Jesus was not born on year zero.
This thing is about one reply to me if Jesus is historical.
I have to say its in the affirmative. Why would I doubt that?
Its obvious, its 2020 man! I was born in 1964!
These numbers came from what? In reference to?
Mickey Mouse? Goofy? Jimmy Cricket? Kermit the Frog? No,
But someone who is greater than Qin Shi Huang.
Someone greater than Alexander the Great.
Someone greater than Genghis Khan
Someone greater than Buddha and even Muhammad.
Not good research.
Anyway, I dont think Mickey mouse was born some 2020 years ago. You should have known that before making statements like this. Read up.
I'm not really a researcher but 2020 is reference to Jesus Christ.
And it that simply answers Jesus is historical.
If he ain't, then why is history referencing annual times on a fictional character?
Yeah. But wrong.