Is it? When have you demonstrated a "designer" to being an actual possibility?
Just claiming it is a possibility isn't enough.
When have you demonstrated that no designer is needed?
Also, since you seem to think that bare claims are valid "possibilities", how did you conclude that there are just 2 possibilities? If bare claims count as possibilities, I'ld rather say that the actual amount of possibilities is potentially infinite....
You can count them with me if you want.
1--the universe was designed by an intelligence.
2--the universe was not designed by an intelligence.
Some people might state it a different way,,,,,,,,, that design in the universe is so obvious that the question is whether it designed itself or was designed.
We are saying that your claim is meaningless and that for something to be regarded as an actual possibility, it needs to be demonstrated as an actual possibility.
Just claiming it will not cut it.
Yes OK, that is what I say about your claim that there is no designer.
Yes and it is not allowed to just make stuff up and declare it to be valid "just because". Like you are doing.
This is a strength of science, not a weakness...
Science does not make up the idea that there is or that there is not a designer even if theists and atheists do that.
Science has that strength,,,,,,,,,,,,, but also has weaknesses.
Only because there is nothing there to study.............
Yes, science does not know how to recognise whether something has been designed or not.
Nobody is saying that and you have been informed of that multiple times already.
But alas................
And that is your dishonesty when you claim that God is a fiction and then claim that you do not believe that. You contradict yourself.