• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How Do You Think The Whole Trump Fiasco Will Turn Out?

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
I’m pretty sure @Quetzal was talking about Shad or eSmith or Salvador.

Actually I think the three of them may be just one guy, logging on and spouting the same stuff with three different names. ;)
I was, thank you for the assist. I was not clear.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I’m pretty sure @Quetzal was talking about Shad or eSmith or Salvador.

Actually I think the three of them may be just one guy, logging on and spouting the same stuff with three different names. ;)
They have very different personalities, backgrounds & posting styles.
I don't believe that a single person could create such different posters.
Of course, everyone knows that you & @Quetzal are the same person.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
They have very different personalities, backgrounds & posting styles.
I don't believe that a single person could create such different posters.
Of course, everyone knows that you & @Quetzal are the same person.
Crap. I knew I would be found out, just not this soon! :eek:
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Umm. . . Pelosi is more than willing to reopen the government. You do realize that the Reps and Trump could open the government tomorrow if they wanted to, as all the Dems are ready to reopen the government. If this was up to Pelosi our government would be funded right now.

It's about getting what they want. Its was first about party's then Trump and Pelosi took it to a personal level.
Trump to Pelosi, you can't use that plane.
Pelosi to Trump, you can't give the SOTU in the house.
 

youknowme

Whatever you want me to be.
It's about getting what they want. Its was first about party's then Trump and Pelosi took it to a personal level.
Trump to Pelosi, you can't use that plane.
Pelosi to Trump, you can't give the SOTU in the house.
I don't think you understand how Congress works.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
I believe it will eventually dawn on the House Democrats that Trump's ego will never permit him to compromise on shutting down the government---He's incapable of admitting he put himself in a corner

.​

---and because he's incapable of rustling up any empathy for anyone but himself, including the poor government employees he's put out of work, it will be up to the House to save their homes and put bread on their tables, and will therefore capitulate and give him his money.



That's what I think will happen.

.
and then foreign flags will fly on the neighbors flag pole.....

you think it's about money?
well......we ARE an economically based country

poor workers?
like the American losing his job to cheap immigration labor?

I have seen these people cuffed and led out of the building
a dozen at a time
too stupid to NOT use the same false social security number when applying for work
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
I have seen these people cuffed and led out of the building
a dozen at a time
too stupid to NOT use the same false social security number when applying for work
I am curious. Did the employers get any sanctions?
Around here, the mere rumors that the Feds might show up shut down a couple big factories completely. The plants simply didn't have enough legal employees to even open. All kinds of muckety mucks were all over the radio and internet and stuff insisting that anybody with employment was welcome in the community and there would be no such raids.

Doesn't that make us a sanctuary city? And it's here in the heartland of Trumpistan.
Tom
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
And for the record, I think that's a good thing. Again, as a Canadian, my Prime Minister has a majority government, and that gives him much greater power over both the legislative and the executive functions of government than a US President could ever have. (You may take that as a small point of envy, if you will.)
The Canadian system just has different checks than the American system. Yes, the Prime Minister has more power than an American president, but a PM can also be removed from their position at will by the House of Commons or, potentially, by the Governor General.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
I am curious. Did the employers get any sanctions?
Around here, the mere rumors that the Feds might show up shut down a couple big factories completely. The plants simply didn't have enough legal employees to even open. All kinds of muckety mucks were all over the radio and internet and stuff insisting that anybody with employment was welcome in the community and there would be no such raids.

Doesn't that make us a sanctuary city? And it's here in the heartland of Trumpistan.
Tom
I live right in the middle of a major state
too far north to say the illegals just.....'happened'

yeah they got cuffed like a centipede

BUT..... I heard NO word of them after that
and NO word of management being dealt with

the word I got.....all of the illegals hired on under the same social security number

and no one in the office saw that?????????

seems to me....holding the CEO in contempt (of something) should have happened

and of course.....who foots the bill to send the 'bad people' back to Mexico?
 
Last edited:

Thief

Rogue Theologian
I also heard of a rented house....where many of them hold up
they all share the monthly payment

but the house is trashed
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
seems to me....holding the CEO in contempt (of something) should have happened
But it probably didn't.

That's my big problem with USA immigration policy. The real problem isn't drug dealers or government entitlements fraud. It's the damages done to entry level workers being replaced by cheap, unvetted and unregistered, foreign labor.

But those people are hugely profitable to the investing class. Undocumented workers both keep labor costs down and retail consumption up. It's a win win for the investing class. It's also a lose lose for blue collar folks. But the investing class can buy Senators and the blue collar folks can't even organize a union.
Tom
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
The Canadian system just has different checks than the American system. Yes, the Prime Minister has more power than an American president, but a PM can also be removed from their position at will by the House of Commons or, potentially, by the Governor General.
While those are essentially "true," they are also excessively unlikely. As I was careful to say, a Canadian PM with a majority government is unlikely to lose a confidence vote in the house, for the simple reason that the majority of members in that house owe their positions and perks to him.

And the Governor General, who acts primarily on "the advice of the head of government," but who also retains the right to advise, counsel and warn, would almost never interfere with a majority government in such a way.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
While those are essentially "true," they are also excessively unlikely. As I was careful to say, a Canadian PM with a majority government is unlikely to lose a confidence vote in the house, for the simple reason that the majority of members in that house owe their positions and perks to him.
You said that we currently have a majority government. I was talking about the Canadian system overall, not just the current Parliament.

Over the last 20 years, we've had a minority government for 7 of them, so it's not exactly a rare thing.

And the Governor General, who acts primarily on "the advice of the head of government," but who also retains the right to advise, counsel and warn, would almost never interfere with a majority government in such a way.
It would be rare, certainly... and GGs are reluctant to interfere with the government to that degree, but it does happen very occasionally.

And the fact that the GG has the power to appoint a new PM probably helps to deter PMs from doing things that would get them removed, so the power doesn't have to be actually used to have an impact as a check on behaviour.
 
Top