Parchment
Active Member
I wouldn't put it past the CIA to make up just about anything!!
In a court of law I think that would make them an unreliable witness.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I wouldn't put it past the CIA to make up just about anything!!
Do you suggest that truth is whatever favors Hillary, & tarnishes Trump;Ironic that the ones that defended Hillary and her email scandal are the same ones jumping up and down over a "possible" Russian hack job of the DNC that helped Trump. In other words:
Hillary scandal: there is nothing to see. You are making assumptions and jumping to conclusions. She was cleared. She is trustworthy and should be President.
Russian "potential" scandal: Trump was assisted by the Russians! The DNC was hacked! Burn them at the stake! They conned you and are playing you all for fools!
Hillary was investigated hugely. People believed all sorts of implausible things, even after the investigations. She is not an elected official and never will be again.Hillary scandal: there is nothing to see. You are making assumptions and jumping to conclusions. She was cleared. She is trustworthy and should be President.
I haven't seen one shred of evidence or heard a good argument that would make me believe that Russians somehow got Trump elected. We do know that the same intelligence agencies that are claiming "the Russians did it!" are the same intelligence agencies that got us into the first Iraq war under false pretenses and have used mass surveillance against it's own people for years and lied about it and now we are supposed to trust them with the claim that somehow Russians manipulated the 2016 U.S. election. I'd say there is probably far more evidence and a better case to be made that many of our own domestic media sources attempted to overtly and covertly manipulate public opinion influencing the election in Clinton's favor rather than Russia in Trumps.
Hand waving this away by changing the subject to Hillary is beyond partisan. It's treason.
Tom
Travelling thru MI, OH, PA, NY, CT, & MA, I saw a whole lotta Trump & Pence signs.Yes, Trump won despite massive subversion of democracy by Democrats. Can you image how much greater his win would have been without the bias against him?
anecdotally, I traveled all over Michigan during the campaigns and the ratio of Trump signs to Hillary was literally a thousand to one, even in areas that were all 'Obama' last time. It's very suspicious to me that Michigan was even close.
You supporting Putin and voting for Trump. It's a twofer! You supported two bullies with one vote.A compelling desire to believe can lead to.....you know....
Lot of Russians through there Comrade, so no wonder.Travelling thru MI, OH, PA, NY, CT, & MA, I saw a whole lotta Trump & Pence signs.
I saw only a couple Hillary signs.
And you are not going to see it since we are not going to publicly expose of intelligence-gathering techniques.I haven't seen one shred of evidence or heard a good argument that would make me believe that Russians somehow got Trump elected.
Your conclusion from some kind of rationale is illogical.You supporting Putin....
I voted for the least dangerous bully......and voting for Trump. It's a twofer! You supported two bullies with one vote.
You'll have to ask the people who are upset why they are.Why aren't these partisans at least a little upset by this? They are upset not by the act, but that they got caught. Wow. Simply Wow!
Even in Taxachusetts?Lot of Russians through there Comrade, so no wonder.
These kind of posts make me laugh. In other words the Russians exposed the truth about Hillary via WikiLeaks and Trump won.The election was so close(except in the popular vote) That the wikileaks hacks alone were enough to throw the election in Trumps favour, and now the CIA says they have conclusive evidence those hacks were coming form the Russian government, there, I showed you how the Russians threw the election, now go talk your Trump nonsense somewhere else!!
Conned? More like the truth about Hillary came out and folks decided they didn't want her. She got trounced in areas that solidly supported Obama.It's hard to see evidence when you're so busy denying it has happened.
What we know about Russia's role in the DNC email leak
Here's the truth: you've been conned. You've been conned by Trump and the Russkies helped. You've elected the one candidate supported by bigots and communists alike. The irony isn't lost on the world. The only clueless peeps are those who've been taken.
Aye, here's the 700# gorilla in the room....Conned? More like the truth about Hillary came out and folks decided they didn't want her. She got trounced in areas that solidly supported Obama.
That really has nothing to do with the issue as the election is over and settled.Conned? More like the truth about Hillary came out and folks decided they didn't want her. She got trounced in areas that solidly supported Obama.
I don't worry about whether ferriners like or dislike Trump.The last poll I saw had it that Trump only had an average of around a 10% approval rating in the western European countries plus China and Japan, with his highest rating (20%) being China and his lowest (around 6%) in the Scandinavian countries.
No argument here.The bottom line: Trump is scary.