Kolibri
Well-Known Member
When I came to see the actual jewish prophecies I became REALLY surprised that christians actually blame jews for not recognising the messiah.
The Torah is said to be for ever in the bible, yet allegedly, Circumcision is no longer important according to Paul? Kosher no longer important? so when God said the Torah was for ever he didnt really mean for ever?
If they started by teaching the jewish understanding before teaching christianity almost no one would be a christian. It is really ironic for a religion that allegedly is founded by a jewish man who said he came as a fulfillment of jewish law to be so obviously non jewish and against some of the clearest points of the god of the Torah.
I have found that many people misunderstood Paul. He was not saying that a person could not get circumcised or eat kosher if they wished. But there were Judizers among Jewish Christians that were insisting that the Gentile Christians adopt circumcision in the hopes that by complying with the regulations of the Law Covenant some of persecution by the Jews could be avoided. (Ga 6:12) The Law Covenant was never binding on Gentiles to begin with.
According to Jesus, after his death, the Law Covenant was fulfilled - that is ended with its purpose and promises satisfied. Now the Messiah had arrived, and now there could be a gathering of people that would serve in the double capacity of kings and priests. (Ex 19:6)
"Indeed, it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away then for one stroke of a letter of the Law to go unfulfilled." - Luke 16:17
"He then said to them: 'These are my words that I spoke to you while I was yet with you, that all the things written about me in the Law of Moses and in the Prophets and Psalms must be fulfilled.'" - Luke 24:44
But what indicates that the Law Covenant would be ended from the Hebrew Scriptures?
Well there is Daniel prophesy of the 70 weeks. At the end of the 70th week of years the covenant would no longer be in force. 3 1/2 years earlier acceptable temple sacrifice and gift offering would cease - incidentally this was the year when the Messiah was "cut off" or "put to death." (Da 9:26a,27)
Also Jeremiah 31:31-40 focuses on a "new covenant". Jeremiah 31:36 is in regards to the new covenant, not the hand-written document, when it says: "'If these regulations should ever fail,' declares Jehovah, 'Only then would the offspring of Israel cease as a nation before me always.'" So, when Jehovah says "my loyal love will not be removed from you, nor will my covenant of peace be shaken," he has in mind the effects of the new covenant, not the old. (Isa 54:10)
I am sure you may have other verses you have in mind regarding the permanence of the Torah. I can not remember them all to deal with them preemptively. So I welcome them in small doses if you want to share them.