waitasec
Veteran Member
but is morality and ethics the same thing?
i don't think so
morals reflect a personal view
ethics reflect societies view as a whole
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
but is morality and ethics the same thing?
In order act using logic, cause and effect, evidence, etc we must have intent. There must be reasoning present and we must consider the consequences. To use these qualities successfully means that our intent is actualized. If I act and consequences arise that I did not intend then I did not understand the full scope of my actions. If I did not understand the full scope of my action then I did not fully apply cause and effect. Thus a better moral decision will have existed.
I might agree....so quote post #62...and consider the consequences.
And yet there are a vast number of defines moralities the world over.
Thus the REASON morality is subjective...
Morality of generation seems a bit worthless when you stop and consider the vast number of moralities each generation has.
You do understand that I was considering the implications of another person's argument?
I had not stated my view
Save, in relation to perspective
on that other argument
By the sword.
relative.
subjective.
perhaps-
but certainly not the only one!
not plausibly speaking anyhow.
Sure, we can say, in the end,
only one truth will prevail
Yet, if one of us
guesses correctly
but argues incorrectly
who could blame the others
for thumbing their noses?
Indeed! and who is worthy to stand before heaven?
So..did you actually consider?
If you ARE able to enter, and no one objects....
It could then be your turn to watch the door....
and a sword will be handed to you.
Right and wrong as seen and dealt by you?
Yet it remains written....
'Better to be a doorkeep in the house of my God
than to dwell in the tents of wickedness'.
Why the chosen!...If they are...by a choice, of course-
Yet, is it really theirs?
And is this really mine?
Perhaps again you are mistaken...
On that which I lay claim...For...
Neither in tent nor house:
Have I called myself judge.
Their choice.....not ours.
Very different than your earlier ode.
Morality is relative....
It is given to you to deal with indiscretion, and what you allow to pass,
will affect everyone else's peace.
So....the knock at the door...and someone of indiscretion enters.
You've got the sword.
It's your call.
Yet so many of this world desire it to be so, that He be king.
First they claim to lay their faults unto Him....
and then claim He will be kind about it...later on.
Judgment?....yeah.
You cannot walk among angels without it.
Chosen?...yeah again.
The angelic choose who will follow and who will be left behind.
Their choice.....not ours.
This.... versus
So you didn't see the similarity?
As you are now, you are developing a sense of judgment.
Even the Carpenter had no desire of a crown.
Of Himself, He did say...'brother and fellow servant'.
Because he already claimed to have one? If he was the Son of God, wouldn't he be the prince to the king, and already have a very high place in the kingdom of Yahweh?
A quick comparison of one gospel to another...and you will see....
He never wanted a crown on His head.
He did leave the vicinity when such talk arose.
It is the religious who insist their Inspiration must also be their king.
His own disciples, and any follower, to this day....insist.
But of Himself He did say...'brother and fellow servant'.
His followers and believers should leave it as such.
Then he is a liar?