exchemist
Veteran Member
As you've posted this in Religious Debates, I presume this is not about the science. Which is just as well because, in science terms, your question would have been a silly question, for the reasons some of the replies indicate.Many arguments here about the bible and creation are about "a day". We all only know the concept of "a day" as we live our lives here on earth.
How long was a day when the universe became the universe?
So I take it this is about the "day" as referred to in Genesis. The mainstream Christian view of the Genesis account is allegorical. The use of a succession of "days" is just a way to tell a story of creation as a labour of God, progressing in stages with, importantly, a day of rest (and, later on, worship) at the end. "Days" obviously make no astronomical sense before there was an earth orbiting a sun, but then it is not a story about astronomy.
The Genesis creation story is really about the following crucial ideas:
- God as creator of the universe
- God as creator of Man, in His own image, i.e. with an immortal soul
- The relationship between God and Man, as a personal relationship, involving communication in both directions
- The acquisition by Man of moral awareness, and hence of moral responsibility
- The intrinsic moral imperfection (sinfulness, or disobedience) of Man and its consequences.
These ideas underpin everything else in the bible, in both Old and New Testaments.