Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"sola scriptura " not at fault.And the overwhellming majority of these denominations are protestant (and that's not even counting the little independent non-denominational protestant churches). Catholicism only has seven rites, and these are united under the Pope and the catechism. Eastern Orthodoxy has 15 self governing churches, but like the Catholics, they are united by a common doctrine. It simply appears that "sola scriptura" is inadequate to maintain unity.
Why stop at the church level, why not just call every individual within the church a different "denomination". After all, every church will have it's "cliques". Each imposing it's own imagined "authority". And so will every individual within the cliques.Personally, I think it's perfectly reasonable to look at the issue in terms of:
- authority: the churches and members of one denomination are all under a common authority.
- community: the churches and members of one denomination all recognize themselves and their fellows as members of the same denomination.
By that measure, a single church can be a denomination in and of itself, and two churches with identical doctrines can be in two different denominations.
I think you make a mistake when you assume that "different denomination" implies "disagreement."
Two big reasons:Why stop at the church level, why not just call every individual within the church a different "denomination". After all, every church will have it's "cliques". Each imposing it's own imagined "authority". And so will every individual within the cliques.
We are all autonomous. And we are all "members". The lines could be drawn, anywhere. But if you ask a thousand Christians to name 20 Christian "denominations", they couldn't do it. let alone 200.Two big reasons:
- a member of a church isn't autonomous. They belong to a church.
- the word "denomination" has a meaning defined through usage, and what you're describing isn't how anyone actually uses the word.
So, you make this an individual problem even though Christians are meant to and have formed communities? And you make it a binary thing, True Christian™ or "other" and you assume that it is a clear thing who is and who isn't?
We are all autonomous.
And we are all "members".
They're drawn by usage. Or are you not familiar with how language works?The lines could be drawn, anywhere.
And if a Christian doesn't know that something exists, this means it doesn't exist?But if you ask a thousand Christians to name 20 Christian "denominations", they couldn't do it. let alone 200.
It may seem clear to you but how then does it come that there is so much disagreement about it? Do you think people of other denominations than yours haven't read the bible?Why it would not be a clear thing when Bible defines it very clearly?
When I put the above question into my preferred search engine, I got answers ranging from 300 to 45,000+.
This may be in part because of a difference in the definition of "denomination". The high numbers usually result from counting churches (e.g. churches of different countries or even states as different denominations) which have no differences in their dogma. The low numbers otoh lump denominations together which have doctrinal difference but share a common name.
So this will be the counter thread to my recently opened What makes a Christian?. Here I focus on the doctrinal differences. I expect that we will find that the number of denominations is much higher than 300 but lower than 45,000. The simple fact that with every question that gets answered differently, the number doubles (for binary answerable questions).
What are the differences in the denominations you know of?
(Simply think of why you are a not a Catholic/Baptist/Quaker/JW/...)
It may seem clear to you but how then does it come that there is so much disagreement about it? Do you think people of other denominations than yours haven't read the bible?
"Religion: Disciple of Jesus"!I think the disagreement comes from that people don't like the truth. They like their own doctrines more. Maybe they have even read the whole Bible, but they just don't like everything it says, that is why they make own interpretation and doctrine and twist straight to crooked.
Is that why you disagree with other denominations? Because you don't like the truth?I think the disagreement comes from that people don't like the truth. They like their own doctrines more. Maybe they have even read the whole Bible, but they just don't like everything it says, that is why they make own interpretation and doctrine and twist straight to crooked.
"Religion: Disciple of Jesus"!
Can one name even one disciple of (Jesus) Yeshua- the Israelite Messiah who wrote any of the four Gospels, please? Right?
Is that why you disagree with other denominations? Because you don't like the truth?
It doesn't seem like you're being deliberately untruthful, but it does seem like you're confused or mistaken.I don't like the denominations, because I don't think they are loyal to Jesus. I want to be a disciple of Jesus and by how Jesus defines it, I don't think the denominations are disciples of Jesus. Do you think I am not truthful? If yes, please explain how I am not truthful?
Reminds me of an old true story.....If I still was Christian, I'd say they're all wrong but mine.
Those scholars who analyze the texts say that John has more than one author, that it is based on a much shorter Book of Signs.Why do you ask? I think John was a disciple of Jesus and the gospel of John is by him. And I believe also the other Gospels are written by disciples of Jesus, not necessarily by the twelve original disciples.
Those scholars who analyze the texts say that John has more than one author, that it is based on a much shorter Book of Signs.
It doesn't seem like you're being deliberately untruthful, but it does seem like you're confused or mistaken.
It's impossible to be a Christian without being in a denomination. Practicing Christianity without being in a denomination would be like typing without a font or speaking without an accent. It's a contradiction in terms.
"Denomination" is just the term we use to describe all the components that make up the whole of Christianity (or any religion), so if you're in that whole, you're in one of its components. It can't be any other way.