I will feel free to do whatever I choose to do. Got it? Are you straight on that?Then feal free to ignore me from now on.
Enjoy your chess.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I will feel free to do whatever I choose to do. Got it? Are you straight on that?Then feal free to ignore me from now on.
What is your interpretation of the Biblical Genesis?Your made up words are not accurate.
You had the reference correct. Your interpretation is faulty.
I see no corrections. You are starting to sound like a broken record player.Don't blame others for problems that you caused. When you ignored the corrections that is your problem.
No questions. You were asking me questions... remember?But yes, let's move on. Refer back to the version of the scientific method that I posted.Do you have any questions?
Um...Like talking to a dead cat on acid.
Why should you care what I believe about a diety or not?What is your interpretation of the Biblical Genesis?
I am most interested in how you figure there was no deity involved when it flat out starts with:
Genesis 1:1(BP+) InG1722 the beginningG746 God madeG4160 G3588 G2316 theG3588 heavenG3772 andG2532 theG3588 earth.G1093(AFV) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.(ASV) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.(BBE) At the first God made the heaven and the earth.(Bishops) In the beginnyng GOD created ye heauen and the earth.(Brenton) In the beginning God made the heaven and the earth.(BSB) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.(Cepher) IN the beginning Elohiym created את the heavens and את the earth.(CEV) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.(Darby) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.(DRB) In the beginning God created heaven, and earth.(ERV) God created the sky and the earth. At first,(ESV) In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.(ESV+) R0 In the R1beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.(Ewe OCS) Le gɔmedzedzea me la, Mawu wɔ dziƒo kple anyigba.(Geneva) In the beginning God created the heauen and the earth.(GNB) In the beginning, when God created the universe,(GW) In the beginning God created heaven and earth.(ISV) In the beginning, God created the universe.(JPS) In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.(JUB) ¶ In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.(KJV) In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.(KJV+) In the beginningH7225 GodH430 createdH1254 (H853) the heavenH8064 and the earth.H776(KJV-1611) In the beginning God created the Heauen, and the Earth.(KJVA) In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.(KJV-BRG) In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.(LEB) In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth—(LITV) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth;(LSV) In [the] beginning God created the heavens and the earth,(MKJV) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.(NET) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.(RV) In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.(TLV) In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.(TS2009) In the beginning Elohim created the heavens and the earth.(WEB) In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.(WEBA) In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.(Webster) In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.(YLT) In the beginning of God's preparing the heavens and the earth—
Dealers choice.Um...
Which one is on the acid?
The cat, or the one talking to it?
So then "GodDidIt" is in fact the correct interpretation.Why should you care what I believe about a diety or not?
I thought you wished to discuss science.
I do believe in a God that created all things... but why should our conversation be about that?
Why not just stick to the science?
Not if I never said it.So then "GodDidIt" is in fact the correct interpretation.
I didnt bring it up so no i am not being dishonest.Which means you are being most dishonest in this thread.
Bye.I can no longer take you seriously.
Have a nice day.
YOU brought up the cat on acid.Dealers choice.
Why not ask a question or make a point that can be discussed instead of derailing the conversation?
And you claim to want honest discussion...Not if I never said it.
I didnt bring it up so no i am not being dishonest.
Bye.
And this is an example of how the conversation goes.... meow...meow.YOU brought up the cat on acid.
Since you are being so evasive on the actual topic, I thought I would see how evasive you would be on the acid cat YOU brought up.
How have.i been dishonest? Just because you keep saying it does not make it real.And you claim to want honest discussion...
You flat out said that "GodDidIt" was not the correct interpretation of Genesis.How have.i been dishonest? Just because you keep saying it does not make it real.
I didn't bring God into the discussion... even though this is a discussion in a religion forum.
I am willing to have a discussion and not mention God... but I am using Genesis as a historical source.
What post was that in?You flat out said that "GodDidIt" was not the correct interpretation of Genesis.
Then admitted that it is.
I was not discussing my beliefs but what I was saying. I was using Genesis as a historical source and you were assuming I was using Genesis as a religious source.That is being dishonest.
I do not need to ask any more questions of you. You have repeatedly confirmed that you are a science denier and you have so far demonstrated that you cannot have a proper discussion. But hope reigns eternal.I see no corrections. You are starting to sound like a broken record player.
No questions. You were asking me questions... remember?
You need to talk to historians. It is not a historical source. It is a mistake to use it that way.I was not discussing my beliefs but what I was saying. I was using Genesis as a historical source and you were assuming I was using Genesis as a religious source.
What science have I denied? **mod edit**I do not need to ask any more questions of you. You have repeatedly confirmed that you are a science denier and you have so far demonstrated that you cannot have a proper discussion. But hope reigns eternal.
Where do you get the idea I am running?Why are you running away? It appears that you think that if you run away that you will win some how.
Historians and archeologists use a Bible all the time when working in that area of the world as a reliable historical text.You need to talk to historians. It is not a historical source. It is a mistake to use it that way.
So show that. I am waiting on your promised evidence that will change my mind.We know that scientifically it is wrong and we know that historically it is wrong.
If you believe in Noah and his magical boat you have denied all of the sciences. And pointless questions are an example of running away. As you just did there.What science have I denied? That would be a lie unless you have some proof.
Where do you get the idea I am running?
Historians almost never use the Bible. It has far too many errors in it. For example you have surely studied the Bible. What famous biblical character has two different birth dates at least ten years apart?Historians and archeologists use a Bible all the time when working in that area of the world as a reliable historical text.
So show that. I am waiting on your promised evidence that will change my mind.