OP. Typical atheist.
No offence meant, its rude and harsh sorry but but I just invented a term. Khmer Rouge school of theology. Analogy with "What is rotten must be removed" - a Khmer Rouge slogan.
Considering spirituality often codes for a type of well being, even by secular standards that's not bad for "outdated, unscientific nonsense" etc.
Maybe its, its expressive of repressed jealousy of peoples "illegitimate cheat codes" for health.
Often as a decadent atheist I would resent peoples healthy spirituality - it wasn't fair play.
Ok, intellectually, you may win. You have Occam, that settles it. Is that all that matters?
Lets contrast spiritual music versus what the Latin Mass Society magazine lebelled "secular din".... is that relevant?
Ok, that's aesthetics, personal. So, is faith that different?
Or is it just about a proposition (there is but one God), isolated from its natural environment, and studied under a certain type of lens?
No offence meant, its rude and harsh sorry but but I just invented a term. Khmer Rouge school of theology. Analogy with "What is rotten must be removed" - a Khmer Rouge slogan.
Considering spirituality often codes for a type of well being, even by secular standards that's not bad for "outdated, unscientific nonsense" etc.
Maybe its, its expressive of repressed jealousy of peoples "illegitimate cheat codes" for health.
Often as a decadent atheist I would resent peoples healthy spirituality - it wasn't fair play.
Ok, intellectually, you may win. You have Occam, that settles it. Is that all that matters?
Lets contrast spiritual music versus what the Latin Mass Society magazine lebelled "secular din".... is that relevant?
Ok, that's aesthetics, personal. So, is faith that different?
Or is it just about a proposition (there is but one God), isolated from its natural environment, and studied under a certain type of lens?
Last edited: