I don't believe that for a moment.
And yet it is quite true.
That's a dodge and weave Luis.
No, it actually is insistence in being honest.
This game of pretending that your sense of being doesn't exist is utterly disingenuous.
Maybe it does exist. I simply don't know what you mean by "sense of being", and therefore won't casually say that it does exist.
The fact that you disown your experience of self-awareness because scientism is bullying you is lamentable, but also symptomatic of the post-modern scientific atheist syndrome - which denies the foundation of person, the sense of being, on the grounds that it is not scientifically testable !
Is that even a fact, though?
You are assuming a huge lot about me, based in just a few words that are of questionable clarity in the best of days.
Extraordinary. Without scientific confirmation, you cannot acknowledge your sense of existence !
I have strong suspicion that people's sense of existence, if it is at all universal, varies a lot among people.
I will not tell you that I have whatever you believe it to be, though, because I can't do so in good faith. I have neither a good idea of what you mean with that expression, nor means to tell whether I have it.
Would you rather have me lying to you?
That's as pernicious as any religious superstition or dogma in my book. Even worse - religion is about claiming belief in something you don't experience, whereas this is denying something you do experience because science has no theory for it.
So I am a pernicious liar because I don't know what you are talking about?
Really?