Trailblazer
Veteran Member
I made no claims. Baha’u’llah made the claims. I just believe His claims based upon the evidence.Citing a text that isn't factual is irrelevant. You offer no evidence why any rational mind should consider this true. You making more claims on top of claims is not rational.
If you want a factual text I suggest you go to college and buy yourself a textbook.
If you investigate the truth for yourself instead of asking me to prove it to you, you would find the facts for yourself.I don't care what your guru says. I'm asking for facts and reason, not belief and claims based on belief.
My confidence that Baha’u’llah is a Messenger of God does not rely upon what anyone else thinks or believes.Let's note you have been corrected for irrational claims and wrong statements many times, so how does that inform your confidence that a person is a Messenger of God without denial and delusion?
Why would I care what other people think or believe, unless they have evidence that refutes my beliefs?
Obviously you missed what the passage said or you chose to ignore it.
“... inasmuch as man can never hope to attain unto the knowledge of the All-Glorious, can never quaff from the stream of divine knowledge and wisdom, can never enter the abode of immortality, nor partake of the cup of divine nearness and favour, unless and until he ceases to regard the words and deeds of mortal men as a standard for the true understanding and recognition of God and His Prophets.” The Kitáb-i-Íqán, pp. 3-4
What it essentially says is that we will never discover the truth for ourselves if we use the words and deeds of "other people" as a standard by which to understand God and His Prophets. In other words, we cannot measure truth according to what other people say, think or do.
God would only do that if He wanted to. Why should God convince atheists that He exists? Do you really think God cares if you believe in Him? God does not need your belief because God has no needs. Any logical person could figure out that an omnipotent God only does what He wants to so. Since God has not thus far convinced any atheists, the only logical conclusion that can be drawn is that God has no interest in convincing atheists that He exists. If atheists want to believe in God they will have to do their own homework.Then that's reason to doubt. If there's an actual God, and it has actual Messengers, then a competent God will find a way to convince even the most objective thinker.
I made no claims. Baha’u’llah made the claims. I just believe His claims based upon the evidence.It doesn’t. And the more you make claims the God and its messengers exist, and do so without credible evidence, the more doubt is created.
I know I am not mistaken because I did my due diligence and looked at the evidence 100 times over for over 50 years.So you could be mistaken about what you believe?
I already told you how I know, I looked at the evidence. Only a true Messenger could have or would have done what Baha’u’llah did. A false messenger would only have selfish motives. I also know because Baha’u’llah fulfilled all the Bible prophecies and no false messenger fulfilled even one of them.You still offer no method to discern an authentic Messenger of God from a fake. So could you be duped by a false Messenger? How would you know?
You are absolutely wrong about that. Objectivity has no such requirements because objectivity nothing to do with certitude. Having looked at the evidence for over 50 years I would have to be pretty inept at evidence evaluation if I still had doubts.Objectivity would include accepting the possibility your beliefs are mistaken.
Hypothetically I could be wrong because any fallible human could be wrong, but why does it matter to you if I am wrong or not? Is there a reason you need me to be wrong? That is what you should be asking yourself.Can you acknowledge that you, as a fallible being, could be mistaken in your religious beliefs?