ThePainefulTruth
Romantic-Cynic
Hi all!
So glad we have this forum where I could ask this.
I was raised religious, but came to realize in adolescence that other children are raised in other faiths / belief systems , and the fact that I was handed down my tradition doesn't automatically mean it's true.
So I want to know which religion / belief system / world-view is true, if any. My natural instinct is to look into the various belief systems in the world. But Wikipedia tells me there are more than 4,000 religions in the world! And I'm guessing that doesn't necessarily include the non-theistic belief systems.
Just to clarify what I mean by "true"... I think that all world-views have truth in them - eg all religions properly practiced can give a person peace and harmony with others and happiness. But which one or ones, if any, are historically and ontologically correct. Which one is not just a bunch of myths, but is historically factual, and which one(s)' portrayal of reality is commensurate with the way reality really is?
To go through the more than 4000 systems seems very daunting, and yet, how else?
So my question is - how to approach all this, and how to proceed?
(and if ultimately the truth is inaccessible to me, I'd like to at least get the best understanding of reality that I can).
Thanks!
I was frustrated by the pantheon of religions, including the Christianity I was raised in, seeing all the hypocrisy and reliance on blind faith that permeates all of them. So after wandering in the wilderness, so-to-speak, for decades, I determined that all revealed religions (which is essentially all of them) relied completely on hearsay...and ancient hearsay at that. So I finally determined to worship Truth and equate that with God. (I thought it was original, but I learned Gandhi beat me to the punch before I was born.) I developed a pretty reasonable theory for Truth where it has four aspects (knowledge, justice, love and beauty--moving from pure objective into pure subjective).
Anyway, I think there are only two reasonable positions on the existence of God, atheism and laissez-faire deism. The only difference between the two from our perspective in this life, is in the hope the latter offers for a possible hereafter; and that's the belief I adhere to.
But, the many religions ask, what about morality? What about it? Are we supposed to believe the ones that made up all those other stories and myths, when they tell us what is moral? The moral codes of most religions is a huge panoply of non-immoral behavior that the religions use for control of their flocks. But most of them do have, at the bottom of that pile of moral dogma, a version of the Golden Rule. Assuming only a near universal desire for good order, I came up with a version that's rationally deductible from that assumption: Universal, objective morality is honoring the EQUAL rights of ALL to life, liberty, property and self-defense to be free from violation through force or fraud. That's it! All other codes of behavior are individually determined. I call them virtues, which are subject to social pressure, but should never be legislated. And from this, it becomes obvious that there is only one source of immorality/evil--not money, or power or fame etc., which many people handle with honor, but a moral/legal double standard.
....EQUAL rights of ALL....