The Bible is the evidence.
Books are evidence that they were written, that somebody had some words that they wanted written down. Nothing in the Christian Bible is known to be true because it appears there. Believers acknowledge that when they point to evidence that supports some passage in scripture. They are telling us that evidence is the standard for justified belief, not scripture.
The gift of salvation through Jesus Christ is a free gift.
That sounds like Pascal's Wager. Free in this context means at no cost or risk, but such a belief is not free. I was a Christian for nearly a decade. I wonder how many hours were spent reading scripture, praying, and going to church? And how many dollars did I give in tithes to support and promote religion? How many hours and dollars have been saved since by leaving religion? I paid a high price by making an important decision by faith. Lesson learned.
You serve the Word by believing in what it promises (abundant life) and following its commands.
Why would I believe "the Word" and its promises? Why would I consider its advice commands to me, and why would I follow them? I'd need a reason beside promises that don't have to be kept.
Neglecting it inevitably results in deterioration and destruction. Death.
My experience has been the opposite. Claim falsified. Death to me is closer to what I left than what I found. Death of the autonomous and self-actualized self. Death of reason and rational ethics.
Are you reacting this way because “lowering self” seems unpleasant and inconvenient to you? If so, that is exactly what I mean. It is a struggle.
We seek to elevate ourselves and others. Christian ethics is fit for subjects and slaves. The message is always to stand down, which is why Constantine made it his state religion. Be meek. Be longsuffering. Submit. Nothing is beneath you. If stricken, present the other cheek. Because if you do, equality and reward await you - after death. We promise. That's what you tell people you are exploiting so that they accept their lot without resistance.
"How can you have order in a state without religion? For, when one man is dying of hunger near another who is ill of surfeit, he cannot resign himself to this difference unless there is an authority which declares 'God wills it thus.' Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet." - Napoleon Bonaparte
No matter how at peace you think you are, you’re surrounded by a world full of suffering and death.
That is not a reason to become religious.
Ultimately I’m speaking to how to navigate the journey through the world within.
Thanks, but I've already got that covered. It's done empirically. Empirically, we learn how the world works and how to navigate it to achieve preferred outcomes, how to recognize and benefit from opportunities, and how to avoid pitfalls. We also learn what kind of experiences are desirable and undesirable experiences. Experience generates a spectrum of mild and intense euphorias and dysphorias, and we use that knowledge of how the world works and what makes us happy both first short-term and eventually, if we are smart, long-term, to navigate life. We call this wisdom, and no holy books needed in its acquisition, not to mention that the bad advice given by many that cause us to fail to find that happiness. Spoiler: It is not blessed to be meek (not a synonym of humble, polite, or cooperative). It's a poverty of spirit and a curse. Coming soon: the folly of loving enemies and of turning the other cheek to them.
Christ commands to love your neighbor as yourself.
Commands? Even as a suggestion, they're empty words for most people.
And why would one do that? I'll help my neighbor when he needs it. I'll do much more for myself. I'll help myself when I want something. I'll help the loving people in my life more than the ones living nearby. I'll help them get things they want, whereas with strangers, it's going to be limited to things they need if I have to expend time, money, or labor, because there is a limited supply of all of that.