Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
According to the Christian narrative, the Romans didn't _know_ they were fulfilling a prophecy. They were just doing what they were going to do anyway.This has always baffled me.
This Roman crucifixion party have nailed up Jesus; they then decide to gamble for his robes to fulfil, it is said, a prophecy?
This has always baffled me.
This Roman crucifixion party have nailed up Jesus; they then decide to gamble for his robes to fulfil, it is said, a prophecy?
OK. Therefore?This has always baffled me.
OK. Therefore?
To understand what?Therefore he desires an understanding so that he may no longer be baffled.OK. Therefore?This has always baffled me.
This Roman crucifixion party have nailed up Jesus; they then decide to gamble for his robes to fulfil, it is said, a prophecy?
Well isn't this the christian narrative?According to the Christian narrative, the Romans didn't _know_ they were fulfilling a prophecy. They were just doing what they were going to do anyway.
I like your thinking.A case of the Texas Sharpshooter.....
Guy shoots at a barn half a mile away, walks to the barn, & paints a bullseye centered on the bullet hole.
Indeed.Fiction isn't so baffling, it's the believing.
Yes they were written into the narrative to intentionally fulfill scripture, the writer of Matthew does this a lot as this was the most Jewish of the gospels and was written for a Jewish audience.
The asserted quote was "Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it whose it shall be." While the KJV doesn't make it clear, the rest of the verse is an editorial addition by the author of Matthew, not a statement by the Roman soldiers.Well isn't this the christian narrative?
It is the Roman soldiers who say>
King James Bible
They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be that the scripture might be fulfilled, which saith, They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots. These things therefore the soldiers did.
i.e. it is the Roman soldiers speaking. So how would they know what prophesies are to be fulfilled?
Didn't the Romans have their own religion and living God, Caesar?
HuhYes good ole Matty always seems to have an Old Testament prophecy on tap doesnt he.
I wonder why he kept silent when it came to the Jews not being allowed to put Jesus to death when there are a few occasions in the New testament that prove to the contrary?
I Yes good ole Matty always seems to have an Old Testament prophecy on tap doesnt he.
Except that your quote is actually John 19:24.
Peter
Yes they were written into the narrative to intentionally fulfill scripture, the writer of Matthew does this a lot as this was the most Jewish of the gospels and was written for a Jewish audience.
In correct context and translations.The execution party fulfilled other prophecies as well. They did not break any of his bones, and they pierced his side with a spear, after Jesus died, to fulfill Psalm 34:20 and Isaiah 53:5.
No Jewish scriptures have anything to do with jesus.
Because Jews don't take self proclaimed gods seriously.This is a big claim.
It would seem that Jesus was accepted as a teacher for a long time before he claimed to be the Messiah and then was rejected by the temple authorities in Jerusalem.
He did have influence and authority before then and later in Samaria - Samaritans are Jews I believe.
How do you know his writing has not been absorbed into Jewish teachings?
There are many who say that the Dead Sea Scrolls were the records of those Jews who accepted and followed Jesus as 'the Teacher of Righteousness'.