No. It doesn't. You're confused. or willfully ignorant.
but phonies cannot understand.
Guess you'e the phony, in that case.
Didn't they teach you that in seminary?
No. they taught us reality in seminary. And the reality is that the writers of the OT had no knowledge of Jesus, and that it's a big mistake to read "Jesus" into any of the OT texts.
I haven't predicted anything.
Yes you have:
I predict you and your all knowing buddy will soon run away
I leave that to God who predicts that the Lion will lay down by the Lamb when Jesus returns. Gen 1:30 Or did you skip school the day of that lesson?
Gen. 1:30 predicts nothing, nor does it talk about the lion lying down by the lamb. Nor does any other verse in the bible talk about the lion and lamb lying down together.
You're talking about Isaiah, which patently
is prophecy, but you're mushing together two completely separate verses, perhaps by separate authors. Isaiah 11:6 says:
"The wolf shall live with the lamb,
the leopard shall lie down with the kid,
the calf and the lion and the fatling together,
and a little child shall lead them."
Then, Isaiah 65:25 (probably by a different author) says:
"The wolf and the lamb shall feed together,
the lion shall eat straw like the ox;
but the serpent—its food shall be dust!
They shall not hurt or destroy
on all my holy mountain,
says the Lord."
And neither of the prophecies are referring to creation. they are highly metaphoric images. The lion has nothing at all to do with the lamb in either one. In fact, the lion never lies down. So I don't know what you're talking about when you assert that Genesis predicts that the lion and the lamb will lie down together when Jesus returns. Especially since Jesus is never mentioned in Genesis.
But then, I don't read "The Imaginary Scriptures," or "My First Big Picture Book of Pseudo-bible Verses" and then pretend to have actually read the bible. I prefer to stick to the
bona fide article. Perhaps you should do the same.