AndromedaRXJ
Active Member
Would someone explain to me why evolutionists belive that humans evolved from monkeys. In my opinion if we did evolved from monkeys then why is there still monkeys on earth today? Shoulden't they all be evolved?
Humans are monkeys. So it's an invalid question.
Humans are just one of many branches of monkeys. There's other branches of monkeys. Take baboons for instance. They "evolved from monkeys". One might ask, why didn't all other branches of monkeys evolve into baboons? Well because they evolved a different way.
Also, before anyone else says the whole "apes aren't monkeys", I disagree as I like to stick to monophyletic groupings. I use the word "monkey" synonymous with "simian.
So for the people who agree with evolution but keep saying that we didn't evolve from monkeys but simply share a common ancestor. I dunno where the hell this comes from, but that notion is misleading. The ancestor would have been classed as a monkey. It was an arboreal simian with a tail (a tail shouldn't be a defining feature either) that would have highly resembled modern monkeys. On top of that, old world monkeys and apes are more related to each other than either is to new world monkeys. So either apes are monkeys, or monkeys evolved twice on two separate branches where one monkey branch is more related to apes than to another monkey branch, which makes the whole definition of "monkey" completely arbitrary.
Apes are simply tailless monkeys.
Last edited: