• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I challenge the world , bring it on!

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
How strange you think you could have an opinion without justifying it. I could justify you are being a wally if you think space can be destroyed.
A wally is not insulting unless you make it offensive , it is not like I am calling you fat . which would be insulting because I cannot see you so would be lying.

I can justify any claim that I make. Which one do you think that I have not? Also the way that a term is used determines if it is offensive or not. When I point out your ignorance I am point out areas where you need to work on your education. If you do not understand how you are ignorant then you need to ask questions. Don't get your panties into a knot over offers of help.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The big bang states in the beginning nothing existed, no time, no space, 0 dimensions.

In an unknown volume of empty space, there is 0 dimensions totally contracting the big bang thought.

Secondly space cannot be created or destroyed, obvious and axiom regardless of their subjective false claim. There is no evidence that supports their claim that space is created. It is easy to falsify the big bang.
No, it does not say that.

This is an example of ignorance on your part. You can't refute that which you do not understand.

By the way, there is no such thing as "empty space".

And you used your unsupported claim of "space cannot be created or destroyed".

You need to be able to substantiate that with evidence. Too bad that you do not understand the concept of evidence either.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Sometimes though , God is busy and there is a lag in receiving the answer .
All prophets didn't have an idea what God is or how he looks like.
Because they were not real prophets, Humans were not ready at that time to accept God so fairy tales were easier to let you live with. God can now see though it is time to act, God found me whom is so humble and has virtue. I do not want to be known and God knows this.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
The big bang states in the beginning nothing existed, no time, no space, 0 dimensions.

In an unknown volume of empty space, there is 0 dimensions totally contracting the big bang thought.

Secondly space cannot be created or destroyed, obvious and axiom regardless of their subjective false claim. There is no evidence that supports their claim that space is created. It is easy to falsify the big bang.

Again, how things were created from nothingness.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
No, it does not say that.

This is an example of ignorance on your part. You can't refute that which you do not understand.

By the way, there is no such thing as "empty space".

And you used your unsupported claim of "space cannot be created or destroyed".

You need to be able to substantiate that with evidence. Too bad that you do not understand the concept of evidence either.
No Sir, you are being dishonest and defending subjective lies on behalf of the ''Devil''.

You have a belief in a ''book'' that does not provide proof for most of their beliefs.

You cannot create or destroy space, try it, it is evident. Nothing else needed to be provided, the big bang theory destroyed by God.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Sometimes though , God is busy and there is a lag in receiving the answer .

Because they were not real prophets, Humans were not ready at that time to accept God so fairy tales were easier to let you live with. God can now see though it is time to act, God found me whom is so humble and has virtue. I do not want to be known and God knows this.

And God told you he's the empty space.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
No Sir, you are being dishonest and defending subjective lies on behalf of the ''Devil''.

You have a belief in a ''book'' that does not provide proof for most of their beliefs.

You cannot create or destroy space, try it, it is evident. Nothing else needed to be provided, the big bang theory destroyed by God.

Now you are again breaking the rules of the forum. You can't claim that I am being dishonest without evidence. And referring to a myth does not help you at all. I explained the concept of scientific evidence to you. Did you not understand it? It is a rather easy concept to understand.

And you need to prove that you cannot create or destroy space. That sound like the ignorance of people that claimed that one cannot create or destroy matter. We know how to destroy or make matter, Einstein laid down the math for it.

You appear to have a belief in a book. I accept the findings of observation and experiment. There is a big difference.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
No Sir, you are being dishonest and defending subjective lies on behalf of the ''Devil''.

You have a belief in a ''book'' that does not provide proof for most of their beliefs.

You cannot create or destroy space, try it, it is evident. Nothing else needed to be provided, the big bang theory destroyed by God.

Scientists don't claim that they know what it was before the big bang, saying it
was 0 dimensions is only the case for the beginning of our universe and that doesn't
mean there was nothing before it, it describes how our universe was born and not
what before it and what initiated it and what is surrounding it.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
And God told you he's the empty space.

God is not a ''he'', god is constant which all elements are not perceptibly different from each other, but the extremes are quite distinct. The space-time continuum is all substance and without the dimensions of substance, there exists nothingness which is God, nothing existing beyond God.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Scientists don't claim that they know what it was before the big bang, saying it
was 0 dimensions is only the case for the beginning of our universe and that doesn't
mean there was nothing before it, it describes how our universe was born and not
what before it and what initiated it and what is surrounding it.

Hard science will tell you there was nothing before the big bang, no time and space.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Now you are again breaking the rules of the forum. You can't claim that I am being dishonest without evidence. And referring to a myth does not help you at all. I explained the concept of scientific evidence to you. Did you not understand it? It is a rather easy concept to understand.

And you need to prove that you cannot create or destroy space. That sound like the ignorance of people that claimed that one cannot create or destroy matter. We know how to destroy or make matter, Einstein laid down the math for it.

You appear to have a belief in a book. I accept the findings of observation and experiment. There is a big difference.
You have lost your argument so resort to Beta tactics and give it the you are insulting me.

That is not insulting, that is simply to help you realise you are not being totally objective and being dishonest to yourself. Your dishonesty to yourself does not hurt my honesty any and people can see this.
 

dfnj

Well-Known Member
God is not a ''he'', god is constant which all elements are not perceptibly different from each other, but the extremes are quite distinct. The space-time continuum is all substance and without the dimensions of substance, there exists nothingness which is God, nothing existing beyond God.

I think your idea of God is not right. If something has no boundaries it is not a thing. If something has no boundaries it cannot be known. You pretend you know God exactly. I am skeptical it is even possible for anyone to truly know God. At best all we can do is make imaginary conjectures. The only place God exists is in our thoughts. Reality is represented by millions of other words. I have never experienced meeting God walking down the street. Have you?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You have lost your argument so resort to Beta tactics and give it the you are insulting me.

That is not insulting, that is simply to help you realise you are not being totally objective and being dishonest to yourself. Your dishonesty to yourself does not hurt my honesty any and people can see this.


No, I am pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. I am offering to help you to learn. By the way, just because you have lost the debate is no excuse to insult me. You have repeatedly demonstrated that you do not understand how logic works. You have repeatedly demonstrated a middle school level of science education. And you have demonstrated a lack of understanding of what is and what is not evidence.

Rather than laugh at you I offered to aid your education. It would be an insult if I said you were not educable. I have instead offered a solution to your short comings.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
I think your idea of God is not right. If something has no boundaries it is not a thing. If something has no boundaries it cannot be known. You pretend you know God exactly. I am skeptical it is even possible for anyone to truly know God. At best all we can do is make imaginary conjectures. The only place God exists is in our thoughts. Reality is represented by millions of other words. I have never experienced meeting God walking down the street. Have you?
God is without boundaries , everyone knows that. I experience walking through and with God every time I walk down the street.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
No, I am pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. I am offering to help you to learn.

Stop right there, it is not me who is learning. There is no flaws, I give honest answers. I am going off for a while now so will leave you with a question

Can space age?

Can space be destroyed?

Answer them honestly or I will start to ignore you because I do not like people who do not tell the truth.
 
Top