• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I challenge the world , bring it on!

james blunt

Well-Known Member
I am quoting science, and gravitational lensing along with gravitational waves are the evidence that spacetime is real. Please address the evidence.

I observe you quoted lots of memory , I do not observe you providing any evidence of a space-time.

Space is independent of time as proven and shown in this thread, time is of substance as shown and proven in this thread. Your words are related to substance not to space.

Gravitational force is a linear, as proven by any object on the ground, an object on the ground has nothing to do with curvature. Einstein explains how to make one body orbit another body by using the linear of gravity to force the orbiting object to follow a curved path.
You really do not want me to put my full thinking science head on, because I will just make you look rather silly.
Lensing is shape being defined by the light, not a curved light. You know very little science but the subjective memory you have and give . Frivolous litigation my friend, I know science and I know God.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
No, God is not in the space, God is 100% the space.

Assuming that God is the space itself, then do you really believe that the space is nothingness,
for example we realize that the gravitational force exist but we can't see it, similar to the electromagnetic waves.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Can both God and time coexist in the same space?

God always exists, there is no beginning or end to God, time ''co-exist's'' with God in the form of substance. All substance has a period of existence that can change in many ways.
God does need substance to exist but substance needs God to exist because all substance needs space/God to exist in.
 

JoshuaTree

Flowers are red?
God always exists, there is no beginning or end to God, time ''co-exist's'' with God in the form of substance. All substance has a period of existence that can change in many ways.
God does need substance to exist but substance needs God to exist because all substance needs space/God to exist in.

Apologies as I apparently misunderstood your initial claim.

So God is the underlying fabric of everything and nothing exists apart from God as God sustains all things. I'm good with that... in my limited understanding.

But it seems to me man could never isolate nothingness as nothingness is outside the scope of physical perception.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Assuming that God is the space itself, then do you really believe that the space is nothingness,
for example we realize that the gravitational force exist but we can't see it, similar to the electromagnetic waves.
Yes space is nothingness, gravitational forces etc exist in space and are of matter. Perhaps you shoud read this at this stage , I have answered :

What is gravity?

Abstract:

On the premise that all signed electrostatic fields are attracted to neutral signed electrostatic fields, this paper proposes a theory that is intended to evidently show a normalising that is, ''Neutral is attracted to Neutral''. A natural phenomenon that may explain the gravity process.
First will be shown is that the formation of zero point energy (ZPE) is a two part binary construction. The ZPE failing to retain form without the simultaneous co-existence of an opposite sign.
A co-existence that shall be established of opposite signs , simultaneously occupying the same geometric point of a R³ real coordinate space, to form a point particle with point mass.
Additionally, we shall establish plausible conceptual considerations of the point particles emitted field. Finally shall be conclusions , based on the provided information of the paper that shall reveal the real beginning of the Universe and define God.


Introduction.

The importance of this paper is to answer the question, what is the underlying mechanics of the gravitational force? Many great minds have considered possibilities, Newton's 1687 discovery pioneering the notions on this mysterious force. Then later in time, Einstein's theory of relativity explaining the force to be a distortion of space or more precisely, space-time.
However, although their contributions are greatly appreciated, nobody so far as answered what the underlying mechanics are, of the gravitational force. Thus leading me to research and question the present information available, looking for the answer. I shall present several chapters that lead to my final conclusion .

Abstract-

This paper is intended to correct relativity and semantics in a primary respect to time. Using a dialectic approach and presenting logical arguments and supporting evidence that opposes the present information. Showing a construction of deductive logical proof's , looking at the true values of the relativity of time that humanity has quantified. Concluding that some of the content uses of relativity have no other discipline, other than the literal content created by the practitioner.

Introduction.

Anybody who has ever learnt some science, must of heard of Albert Einstein's relativity. I could not believe when I first ''heard'' time slowed down and wondered how much of relativity was fact and how much of relativity was mythology. The more we look at the intrinsic details of relativity, the more we can realise the mythology involved. In fact the more closely we inspect the entirety of physics science, the more we can observe an ever growing mythology . We can archive our beliefs because we can look at the intrinsic details of relativity that shows ostensibly, thus leading into explaining certain details that creates this mythology in science.

The Theory of Reality

Introduction

Reality arouses ones curiosity when we consider the state of things as they actually exist. Thought provoking, as if a puzzle with many different components to consider. Components that are the elements and content of the Universe, some content being more mysterious than other content.
Some content, being difficult or maybe impossible to understand, maybe even beyond the level of human intelligence. The theory of reality , will discuss in depth , reality. What is real and what is make believe, what is subjective and what is objective, possibilities and impossibilities.
Thus being said , the theory of reality will be primary focused on the past and present science of physics, where objective truths will be shown that opposes some subjective past/present naive science. The theory of reality shall be mainly focused on two golden principles:


i. Possible

ii. Impossible

There will also be consideration for axioms, things that are self evidently true are generally true regardless of opinion of subjective belief. Additionally, there will be concerns towards possible ostensible content, stated or appearing to be true, but not necessarily true.
The primary goal of this book, is to correct the present understanding of the Universe, to show logical inaccuracies , correcting science firstly , then secondly as a condition of the first, defining ''God''.
The format of this book shall be written in an unusual style, at times it will be story like, other times it will be more formal. I will now begin with the first chapter, Back in Time.

 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Apologies as I apparently misunderstood your initial claim.

So God is the underlying fabric of everything and nothing exists apart from God as God sustains all things. I'm good with that... in my limited understanding.

But it seems to me man could never isolate nothingness as nothingness is outside the scope of physical perception.
nothingness is easy to perceive
 

JoshuaTree

Flowers are red?
not at all, image being inside an infinite invisible ''man''

Well since you put it that way. I have held the opinion for some time that God's imagination is our reality and our soul is God's memory of us. My opinion is one layer removed from your analogy however. Would you care to comment on this?
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Yes space is nothingness, gravitational forces etc exist in space and are of matter. Perhaps you shoud read this at this stage , I have answered :

What is gravity?

Abstract:

On the premise that all signed electrostatic fields are attracted to neutral signed electrostatic fields, this paper proposes a theory that is intended to evidently show a normalising that is, ''Neutral is attracted to Neutral''. A natural phenomenon that may explain the gravity process.
First will be shown is that the formation of zero point energy (ZPE) is a two part binary construction. The ZPE failing to retain form without the simultaneous co-existence of an opposite sign.
A co-existence that shall be established of opposite signs , simultaneously occupying the same geometric point of a R³ real coordinate space, to form a point particle with point mass.
Additionally, we shall establish plausible conceptual considerations of the point particles emitted field. Finally shall be conclusions , based on the provided information of the paper that shall reveal the real beginning of the Universe and define God.


Introduction.

The importance of this paper is to answer the question, what is the underlying mechanics of the gravitational force? Many great minds have considered possibilities, Newton's 1687 discovery pioneering the notions on this mysterious force. Then later in time, Einstein's theory of relativity explaining the force to be a distortion of space or more precisely, space-time.
However, although their contributions are greatly appreciated, nobody so far as answered what the underlying mechanics are, of the gravitational force. Thus leading me to research and question the present information available, looking for the answer. I shall present several chapters that lead to my final conclusion .

Abstract-

This paper is intended to correct relativity and semantics in a primary respect to time. Using a dialectic approach and presenting logical arguments and supporting evidence that opposes the present information. Showing a construction of deductive logical proof's , looking at the true values of the relativity of time that humanity has quantified. Concluding that some of the content uses of relativity have no other discipline, other than the literal content created by the practitioner.

Introduction.

Anybody who has ever learnt some science, must of heard of Albert Einstein's relativity. I could not believe when I first ''heard'' time slowed down and wondered how much of relativity was fact and how much of relativity was mythology. The more we look at the intrinsic details of relativity, the more we can realise the mythology involved. In fact the more closely we inspect the entirety of physics science, the more we can observe an ever growing mythology . We can archive our beliefs because we can look at the intrinsic details of relativity that shows ostensibly, thus leading into explaining certain details that creates this mythology in science.

The Theory of Reality

Introduction

Reality arouses ones curiosity when we consider the state of things as they actually exist. Thought provoking, as if a puzzle with many different components to consider. Components that are the elements and content of the Universe, some content being more mysterious than other content.
Some content, being difficult or maybe impossible to understand, maybe even beyond the level of human intelligence. The theory of reality , will discuss in depth , reality. What is real and what is make believe, what is subjective and what is objective, possibilities and impossibilities.
Thus being said , the theory of reality will be primary focused on the past and present science of physics, where objective truths will be shown that opposes some subjective past/present naive science. The theory of reality shall be mainly focused on two golden principles:


i. Possible

ii. Impossible

There will also be consideration for axioms, things that are self evidently true are generally true regardless of opinion of subjective belief. Additionally, there will be concerns towards possible ostensible content, stated or appearing to be true, but not necessarily true.
The primary goal of this book, is to correct the present understanding of the Universe, to show logical inaccuracies , correcting science firstly , then secondly as a condition of the first, defining ''God''.
The format of this book shall be written in an unusual style, at times it will be story like, other times it will be more formal. I will now begin with the first chapter, Back in Time.

What about the wave particle duality?
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Well since you put it that way. I have held the opinion for some time that God's imagination is our reality and our soul is God's memory of us. My opinion is one layer removed from your analogy however. Would you care to comment on this?
Scarily, I am considering all God's thoughts are our own thoughts. In example I am typing this sentence to you, what makes me type this sentence? What makes me write the things I write and the styles I write?
It is spooky action up close never mind at a distance. I do have a big worry, why God was also telling me all about God, God also give me a ''flash'' vision of an infinite plane of existence. This plane being a beam of light that contains information. Similar to wi-fi.

Maybe I am being hacked and the hackers are giving the game away. If the world was flat I would be deeply concerned.
 
Top