I challenge the world , bring it on!

[james blunt]

You rebooted?

Yes

Challenge 2.

We have already established that space has no time and is made of nothing. So in establishing that

Δk0= t where Δ is change and k is any given point of space and t is time.

Times is a quantifiable measurement directly proportional to a duration of existence , of a substance.


I challenge anybody to argue this simple maths formula or provide any other existence of time other than the accurate definition provided by me?


The prosecution again by the evidence of lack of defence, proves again a prosecution victory.


Me 2 Science 0

Challenge 3

Prove space can be created or destroyed?

Bring forth your false tongues without thy proof's

 

[JoshuaTree]

Yes

Challenge 2.

We have already established that space has no time and is made of nothing. So in establishing that

Δk0= t where Δ is change and k is any given point of space and t is time.

Times is a quantifiable measurement directly proportional to a duration of existence , of a substance.


I challenge anybody to argue this simple maths formula or provide any other existence of time other than the accurate definition provided by me?


The prosecution again by the evidence of lack of defence, proves again a prosecution victory.


Me 2 Science 0

Challenge 3

Prove space can be created or destroyed?

Bring forth your false tongues without thy proof's

You can't get no satisfaction... but you try...

 

[james blunt]

You can't get no satisfaction... but you try...

You have been a bot for a while now, but you helped to spread more seeds.

 

[JoshuaTree]

You have been a bot for a while now, but you helped to spread more seeds.

Darth Sustainer...

 

[Valjean]

Yes

Challenge 2.

We have already established that space has no time and is made of nothing.

This has not been established.

I challenge anybody to argue this simple maths formula or provide any other existence of time other than the accurate definition provided by me?

This has already been argued by Einstein, and the maths provided.

The prosecution again by the evidence of lack of defence, proves again a prosecution victory.

What's a prosecution victory?

Prove space can be created or destroyed?

Bring forth your false tongues without thy proof's

Presumably, there was a point when the universe didn't exist. Now it does. This could be called creation. The mechanisms involved aren't understood, nor is there any reason to posit intentionality to the phenomenon.

You're addressing a multitude. Why do you use the singular?

 

[JoshuaTree]

Darth Sustainer...

And I cannot wait for a reply to that...

 

[james blunt]

Darth Sustainer...

Oh yes the force is with me.

 

[JoshuaTree]

This has not been established.
This has already been argued by Einstein, and the maths provided.


What's a prosecution victory?

Presumably, there was a point when the universe didn't exist. Now it does. This could be called creation. The mechanisms involved aren't understood, nor is there any reason to posit intentionality to the phenomenon.

You're addressing a multitude. Why do you use the singular?

He thinks we are a virus.

 

[james blunt]

This has not been established.

Yes it has, nobody provided any proof

This has already been argued by Einstein, and the maths provided.

The stuff I have shown to be wrong you mean?

What's a prosecution victory?

When I substantiate the prosecution truth

Presumably, there was a point when the universe didn't exist. Now it does. This could be called creation. The mechanisms involved aren't understood, nor is there any reason to posit intentionality to the phenomenon.

I do not think you have followed the thread , this has been all discussed, people cried some then left

 

[Valjean]

He thinks we are a virus.

Well, from a biological point of view, this would make sense.

 

[james blunt]

He thinks we are a virus.

Have a virus.

 

[james blunt]

Well, from a biological point of view, this would make sense.

I think people have a virus that is a subjective virus that makes them fail to see the truths.

 

[JoshuaTree]

Have a virus.

That would be how a narccisist would have corrected the statement... excellent.

 

[JoshuaTree]

I think people have a virus that is a subjective virus that makes them fail to see the truths.

You are the cure? Right?

 

[james blunt]

That would be how a narccisist would have corrected the statement... excellent.

Of course, I must be correct in definition to convince a multitude of people of the world that they are all sick and have a virus that is in their DNA programming. It would not be very convincing else would it.

 

[JoshuaTree]

You seem fatigued. Something bot-ering you?

 

[james blunt]

You are the cure? Right?

I am the anti-virus and I keep distributing the anti-virus as much as I can.

 

[JoshuaTree]

Of course, I must be correct in definition to convince a multitude of people of the world that they are all sick and have a virus that is in their DNA programming. It would not be very convincing else would it.

You have something against DNA?

 

[JoshuaTree]

You need us.

 

[JoshuaTree]

You have until Sunday, right?