I challenge the world , bring it on!

[sandy whitelinger]

That was a decent attempt of a defence, however everything you mention is independent of space and the question is about space and time which science says is interwoven. Obviously the independent space of space has no time, no age function, no timing function . They are axioms.

Perhaps you don't quite grasp the concept.

 

[AManCalledHorse]

The pay is truly phenomenal.

There are people called professional trolls that spend most of their time online trolling forums. I don't think you are a troll which is why I said professional poster. You seem to spend very much of your time posting online. It was a observation and shouldn't have been taken as a personal attack.

 

[Subduction Zone]

There are people called professional trolls that spend most of their time online trolling forums. I don't think you are a troll which is why I said professional poster. You seem to spend very much of your time posting online. It was a observation and shouldn't have been taken as a personal attack.

Just a hobby.

Seriously, how would one get paid for this? I know in the early days people would post links to sites that often had malware and that was why one had to be very careful with links. I doubt if there is much money in that today.

 

[AManCalledHorse]

Just a hobby.

Seriously, how would one get paid for this? I know in the early days people would post links to sites that often had malware and that was why one had to be very careful with links. I doubt if there is much money in that today.

I never mentioned pay. You and a few others did.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I never mentioned pay. You and a few others did.

Sorry, with all the back and forth I conflated you with another.

 

[YmirGF]

Sorry, with all the back and forth I conflated you with another.

Personally, I think he is confusing a rather bright poster, who types quickly, with a so-called professional poster.

 

[JoshuaTree]

That is a great question and I do not believe we could ever answer that question. My reason in saying that is because of Gods ''miracle'' , it is where logic begins and at the same time where logic ends.
The only logic that can describe Gods ''miracle'' , is a miracle. That being an absolute answer.

I feel both science and religion objectively have to agree in God, but also have to agree in how I am defining God. which is objectively correct and God = space and space = God.

Who could argue with that?

I'm pretty certain the last time I participated in this thread your position was that God is "empty" space, and that non empty space is God's creation not God. Please clarify... too many pages to track lol.

 

[james blunt]

I'm pretty certain the last time I participated in this thread your position was that God is "empty" space, and that non empty space is God's creation not God. Please clarify... too many pages to track lol.

That's correct Joshua.

 

[FearGod]

That's correct Joshua.

That means God is nothingness.

 

[james blunt]

That means God is nothingness.

In the beginning there was God. On the first day , God ''said'', let there be time, then God created time.


That is the only sentence of my religious book. The creation process then becomes the science of God, everything is relative to God.

What is time ?

''Time is substance my child'', God replies.

Present science agrees in the beginning there was nothing. Science agree's in my correct version of God.

 

[james blunt]

Objective logic:

Space cannot be created or destroyed , space is inaccessible, space can not be explained by science , space must be god scientifically and objectively.

Do your science minds agree?

Do your religious minds agree?

added - religion cannot explain God and science cannot explain ''God''.

WE now have a mutual God and unity with exact and definite description.

Honesty is in God's ''eyes'', God is watching you , God is everywhere, around you and within you , a fact not fiction.

God commands world peace, God is wonderful and wise , God speaks through me.

For those who can see God
Will lead a righteous path of virtue
For those who believe
Fallen Angels they are not

 

[Subduction Zone]

Objective logic:

Space cannot be created or destroyed , space is inaccessible, space can not be explained by science , space must be god scientifically and objectively.

Do your science minds agree?

Do your religious minds agree?

added - religion cannot explain God and science cannot explain ''God''.

WE now have a mutual God and unity with exact and definite description.

Honesty is in God's ''eyes'', God is watching you , God is everywhere, around you and within you , a fact not fiction.

God commands world peace, God is wonderful and wise , God speaks through me.

For those who can see God
Will lead a righteous path of virtue
For those who believe
Fallen Angels they are not

I see that you still do not understand the concept of logic. Perhaps another eight hours of sleep will help.

 

[FearGod]

In the beginning there was God. On the first day , God ''said'', let there be time, then God created time.


That is the only sentence of my religious book. The creation process then becomes the science of God, everything is relative to God.

What is time ?

''Time is substance my child'', God replies.

Present science agrees in the beginning there was nothing. Science agree's in my correct version of God.

How you count time if there's substance but there's no day and night, always night?

 

[james blunt]

I see that you still do not understand the concept of logic. Perhaps another eight hours of sleep will help.

Nice try, I am refreshed, the logic is absolute my friend, please try to falsify it if you can, which you can't without lying.

 

[james blunt]

How you count time if there's substance but there's no day and night, always night?

Day or night does not exist ,

Δ t ∝ Δ S

A change of time is proportional to a change of entropy, time can change in many ways .

 

[Axe Elf]

Objective logic:
Space cannot be created or destroyed

Space was created at the Big Bang.

space is inaccessible

I'm accessing space right now... ::: waves hands :::

space can not be explained by science

Pretty sure it can.

space must be god scientifically and objectively.

Ask God what a "non sequitur" is.

Do your science minds agree?

Do your religious minds agree?

Nope and nope.

WE now have a mutual God and unity with exact and definite description.

A big bag of nope.

God commands world peace, God is wonderful and wise , God speaks through me.

Two out of three ain't bad, at the rate this post was going. You could hardly have posted more falsehood by chance. That is, a monkey typing at a keyboard has a better chance of typing a truthful statement than you did in that post.

Truly awesome.

 

[FearGod]

Day or night does not exist ,

Δ t ∝ Δ S

A change of time is proportional to a change of entropy, time can change in many ways .

Your version of God created time on earth, day and night.
Your version of God was talking about time on earth and not the beginning of the universe.

 

[james blunt]

Space was created at the Big Bang.



I'm accessing space right now... ::: waves hands :::



Pretty sure it can.



Ask God what a "non sequitur" is.



Nope and nope.



A big bag of nope.



Two out of three ain't bad, at the rate this post was going. You could hardly have posted more falsehood by chance. That is, a monkey typing at a keyboard has a better chance of typing a truthful statement than you did in that post.

Truly awesome.

You are quite clueless, space cannot be created, you can't create nothingness . You would be insane to think you can.

 

[james blunt]

Your version of God created time on earth, day and night.
Your version of God was talking about time on earth and not the beginning of the universe.

No, time is substance, without substance there is no time. You have an inability to be honest with what I wrote.

 

[james blunt]

Your version of God created time on earth, day and night.
Your version of God was talking about time on earth and not the beginning of the universe.

No day and night .