I have never lost an argument, try me

[IamYourYahaweh]

Lmao love it, my buddy actually says I embody this scene alot, Monty python, what a group

 

[Sargonski]

Well allow me to give you some facts and be open to learning for once. You presented me with an argument and I lost by failing to engage? If nobody engages on another side then it is not an argument. So nothing to lose, Maybe think about presenting a clear and concise argument and what side you're on, I could try and argue almost everything you just said but it's supposed to be one that you choose not me, don't run away now chicken

Why are you calling me "Chicken" .. name calling is not an argument for much friend .. sans the inability of the name caller to make a valid argument .. thus losing.

Nor is Projection - strawman fallacy - a valid argument --- as it is you who is chicken -- refusing to engage and then running around claiing you won something on the basis of lack of participation .. because you are chicken to engage.

You were presented with a cear concise argument .. do you not know what an argument is ? This confirms my suspicions about not being taught Philosophy through 12 years of School .. and thus not knowing what an argument is . which explains also why you think you have never lost one.

You can not lose something you never had Brother YHWH .. and where was your debunking of the philosophical quote .. Referenced for your convenience. so you are now losing another argument .. on the basis of being too chicken to respond .. and a 3rd argument lost your projecting this personal failing onto others.

When it rains it pours friend .. like swatting at flies with a baseball bat ...

 

[IamYourYahaweh]

Lmao love it, my buddy actually says I embody this scene alot, Monty python, what a group

I wish I could argue with John clease in this scene in real time lol

 

[Sargonski]

Lmao love it, my buddy actually says I embody this scene alot, Monty python, what a group

Ouch .. that's not a compliment friend

 

[IamYourYahaweh]

Ouch .. that's not a compliment friend

Eye of the beholder, it's a worthwhile scene to make us both know it, and make many laugh and make light of things. I dont argue all day long or anything, just make posts like this and try to humble some people for fun sometimes

 

[Hooded_Crow]

I would argue that you are not my yahweh.

 

[IamYourYahaweh]

Why are you calling me "Chicken" .. name calling is not an argument for much friend .. sans the inability of the name caller to make a valid argument .. thus losing.

Nor is Projection - strawman fallacy - a valid argument --- as it is you who is chicken -- refusing to engage and then running around claiing you won something on the basis of lack of participation .. because you are chicken to engage.

You were presented with a cear concise argument .. do you not know what an argument is ? This confirms my suspicions about not being taught Philosophy through 12 years of School .. and thus not knowing what an argument is . which explains also why you think you have never lost one.

You can not lose something you never had Brother YHWH .. and where was your debunking of the philosophical quote .. Referenced for your convenience. so you are now losing another argument .. on the basis of being too chicken to respond .. and a 3rd argument lost your projecting this personal failing onto others.

When it rains it pours friend .. like swatting at flies with a baseball bat ...

You always write so much and achieve so little. I still fail to see any concise clear argument or side. But you called me friend, I thought name calling is inappropriate, who is to say the label of chicken or friend is better or worse. Being your friend would be a worse life than a chicken I'd imagine. If you have to get taught philosophy then your brain probably isn't very good man I'm sorry. I didn't need to study dumb ego maniacs from history and the more current morons. Philosophy is a naturally occurring phenomenon for everybody at all times, keep running though friend

 

[IamYourYahaweh]

I would argue that you are not my yahweh.

Why would you argue that, you don't know me or your yahweh. Also the fact you would argue it hints that maybe there is room for doubt on this bold statement. Although I know you're just trying to find an easy win

 

[Hooded_Crow]

Why would you argue that, you don't know me or your yahweh. Also the fact you would argue it hints that maybe there is room for doubt on this bold statement. Although I know you're just trying to find an easy win

Because you said: "You pick the argument and what side of it you want. Sky is blue and I argue otherwise, all up to you."

 

[Daemon Sophic]

You pick the argument and what side of it you want. Sky is blue and I argue otherwise, all up to you. Good luck

You, @IamYourYahaweh, are a very argumentative person. Prove me wrong.​

 

[Sargonski]

Eye of the beholder, it's a worthwhile scene to make us both know it, and make many laugh and make light of things. I dont argue all day long or anything, just make posts like this and try to humble some people for fun sometimes

The eye of the beholder happens to be a friend .. and a good friend indeed is one who is not afraid to point out faults .. and humble of you to accept such criticism but, you expressed a desire to argue with John Cleese .. and you have been given that opportunity .. along with your request for a quote for a philosopher and promise to make them look dumb

"I drink therefor I am" - Philosopher song

 

[Sargonski]

You always write so much and achieve so little. I still fail to see any concise clear argument or side. But you called me friend, I thought name calling is inappropriate, who is to say the label of chicken or friend is better or worse. Being your friend would be a worse life than a chicken I'd imagine. If you have to get taught philosophy then your brain probably isn't very good man I'm sorry. I didn't need to study dumb ego maniacs from history and the more current morons. Philosophy is a naturally occurring phenomenon for everybody at all times, keep running though friend

Look friend .. you run around crying "Chicken Chicken" when it is you that is Chicken to engage in an argument .. something you yourself admit .. but have this desire to project your failings on to others .. and pretend you have won something on that basis.

Now .. focus - The Philosopher Song "I drink therefor I am"

 

[Revoltingest]

Okay easy, you said your oven needs to be cleaned out... your oven as far as I'm aware is not conscious, it doesn't have needs and thoughts so speaking for your oven as if you know what it needs is weird imo

I see how this works.

Claim:
I can't get out of a windowless doorless room that has only a table.
Argument:
Yes you can!
1) Look at the table.
2) You saw it.....so saw it in half.
3) Put it together to make a whole.
4) Take the "hole" from the "whole", & exit the room thru that.

 

[Heyo]

You pick the argument and what side of it you want. Sky is blue and I argue otherwise, all up to you. Good luck

I'm game. But we have to set the rules first. Where, when, and most important, who decides who won.
My suggestions: One-On-One Debates, as soon as the details are decided with at least one post per day, winner is the one with the highest frubal count.
You're up?

 

[Watchmen]

My mama taught me it’s useless to argue with crazy.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

I have never lost an argument,​

Would the other party agree to this statement?

 

[Samael_Khan]

You pick the argument and what side of it you want. Sky is blue and I argue otherwise, all up to you. Good luck

Prove to me that Yahaweh is evil and not worthy of worship and Satan is good and should be the one we worship.

I will take the opposite view.

 

[IamYourYahaweh]

You, @IamYourYahaweh, are a very argumentative person. Prove me wrong.​

Well you presented a creative scenario here all in order to have a smoking gun contradiction conundrum for me. If I argue you to win the argument then it proves your statement to look more truee that I am argumentative so by arguing whether I believe it is true or not I validate your point. If I choose to avoid the argument to not prove your point then I will be seen as someone walking away from an argument and losing. If you allow me to walk away and lose because I don't like arguing is the truth and not use it against me as a way to say you are right then I will do that. So now the tables have turned and we will see if it is you who is the real argumentative one

 

[Daemon Sophic]

….
If you allow me to walk away and lose because I don't like arguing is the truth and not use it against me as a way to say you are right then I will do that.

I see that you have chosen the boldened path. I will not hold it against you.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

I knew someone who never lost an argument -- or at least that he was aware of. He was too stupid to know he'd lost.