• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I support Trump

Whom will you vote?


  • Total voters
    37

Godobeyer

the word "Islam" means "submission" to God
Premium Member
Trump has repeatedly stated that he is willing to use "carpet bombing" tactics against ISIS, which would have the effect of killing significant numbers of innocent civilians. He's also against the agreement with Iran that was and is designed to prevent them from developing nukes.
if he really want to involve USA more in middle east , so I retreat my opinion.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm not an American but I'm with Trump and i hope he wins.
Where your voice will go, to Trump or to Clinton, just curious.
Would you like to borrow a raincoat to weather the ****storm or criticism which awaits you after this announcement?
I plan to vote against Hilda (for Trump) too.
 

Sees

Dragonslayer
Probably be another time I don't vote, but I would pick Trump over Clinton many times over.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
if he really want to involve USA more in middle east , so I retreat my opinion.
It's too hard to say whether he would want to be more or less involved in the ME, plus you really can't necessarily believe in what he says anyway. According to Politifcact, Trump lies or partially lies when he says something in his campaign 79% of the time, so there's literally no way we can even begin to determine what he'd do there, or anywhere else for all that matter.
 

Godobeyer

the word "Islam" means "submission" to God
Premium Member
It's too hard to say whether he would want to be more or less involved in the ME, plus you really can't necessarily believe in what he says anyway. According to Politifcact, Trump lies or partially lies when he says something in his campaign 79% of the time, so there's literally no way we can even begin to determine what he'd do there, or anywhere else for all that matter.
That mean he had multi statements, I mean he had many contradition and non sense opinions ,everytime depend on his mode.
 

Pastek

Sunni muslim
Trump is just another Bush.

He will harass muslims and mexicans and other minorities in his country.
If there's an attack from Daesh in the Us i'm sure Trump would do something in the Middle east.
Plus, what will he do about the Palestinians ? I'm pretty sure all the american presidents were always involves in this conflict, so it will be worst for the Palestinians.
You are not thinking about them

It's been now i think 1 year or more that we hear about the american elections and i think if some muslims prefer Trump to win is maybe because they are tired of hearing him saying bad stuff about us and seeing that what we thought was a joke in the beginning finished to be reality : americans choose him as a candidate, so i guess what you see is that those muslims gave up.

People choose generaly the least worst.
I don't like Hillary too but Trump o_O... the problem with the american elections is that you have no choice than following them because it can have effect on all of us.
 

Acim

Revelation all the time
"Muslims for Trump" fascinates me.

And I think it makes sense, but certainly flies in the face of PC logic/rhetoric.

I think peace-loving Muslims (aka overwhelming majority) despise militant acting, terrorist-type Muslims as much, perhaps more, than anyone. Trump strikes me as saying what many are thinking, minus the filter that finds diplomatic/PC way to explain that type of thinking. I don't see Trump as anti-Islam, and to have even one Muslim say they see this, helps my non-Islamic take on this.

I do think Trump stands better chance at being non-interventionist, but not that he's made isolationism a clear foundation in his platform. I like to think he'll mature on all this and still not give into PC double-speak. Hillary, I think is entrenched in double-speak, so I could see why non leaders in Muslim world would not trust her.

Either way, neither Trump or Hillary are acting alone if they gain position of POTUS. The signal it sends to the world will be as varied in interpretation as it is in the U.S., but again, the idea that "Muslims for Trump" exists right now helps with perspective going forward, as I think most Americans assume all Muslims (without exception) would despise Trump and prefer Hillary's PC take on how to handle that significant aspect of foreign, and even domestic, policy.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Just a reminder that the Republicans in Congress have continually blocked any up or down vote on declaring war on ISIS, plus another reminder that Trump has said he'd be willing to carpet bomb ISIS, so what would happen if Trump would get elected? He doesn't need Congress to give the OK to "bomb the hell" out of the area, to use his words, so maybe someone can explain to me how this makes Hillary more of a threat as a "warmonger"? It seems that to all too many, Trump's own words mean nothing.

Actually, I do agree his words mean nothing at this time, which is even more scary. One remarkable thing about the Pub convention is that nothing specific about anything came out of it, so we don't know hardly a thing more than what we knew before the convention, and that was almost nothing to begin with. IOW, 0 + 0 = 0.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I am deeply disgusted to even consider that people might say such things without being satyrical.
Did you really mean "satyrical"?
Satyr....
"....lustful, drunken woodland gods. In Greek art they were represented as a man with a horse's ears and tail, but in Roman representations as a man with a goat's ears, tail, legs, and horns...."
 

Pastek

Sunni muslim
That mean he had multi statements, I mean he had many contradition and non sense opinions ,everytime depend on his mode.

If you start thinking it's ok if Trump wins it's like thinking it's ok if Le Pen win without thinking at the muslims in France and ignoring it will affect the maghreb, africa and middle east.

Just because people say what they really think about muslims (or other people) doesn't mean they are not dangerous.
 
Top