I support Trump

[SkepticThinker]

I know the smart and the wise from their discussions and i know the liars as well.
Do you want me to tell you who are the smarts and who are the liars in this forum? I really can. but can't.

Nah, I can figure that one out.

I'm just curious what makes you think Trump is so smart and/or wise.

 

[FearGod]

Nah, I can figure that one out.

I'm just curious what makes you think Trump is so smart and/or wise.

Do you think a stupid candidate can reach the presidency election if not a liar?
I said to you I can differentiate between the liar and the smart, did you get it?

 

[SkepticThinker]

Do you think a stupid candidate can reach the presidency election if not a liar?
I said to you I can differentiate between the liar and the smart, did you get it?

So you think he's smart and wise because he won the Republican nomination for president of the United States? And he's a liar?

Do you also think Hillary Clinton is a smart, wise liar, then?

 

[FearGod]

So you think he's smart and wise because he won the Republican nomination for president of the United States? And he's a liar?

Do you also think Hillary Clinton is a smart, wise liar, then?

No, you misunderstood my point.
It's either a stupid but a liar, such as what the Democrats did to win or to be honest but smart as what Trump did to win,
BTW, maybe I'm doing a favor for Hillary to get her some extra votes. who knows

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

I'm sorry but I find this quite bizarre.

You'd prefer to vote for a man who openly hates Muslims, hopes to ban them from entering the US and has said that he wants to monitor mosques for criminal activity? And you're a Muslim?

Well cuz i know Trump wont jeapardize his business for some Farmers!!
He will cool down his anger when he wins

 

[Sees]

I'd say about half the Muslims I talk with regularly here in northeast Ohio are pro-Trump. All the Bangladeshi-Americans so far.

Depends mainly on how much they look at what he's said vs. what's said about what he's said. I think it will be a common theme that they do not want more and more of those who are more "fundamentalist" - as well as wanting less Mid-East intervention.

 

[metis]

I see Pulitizer Prizes as meaningless, or promoting a liberal legacy. Liking giving out Nobel Peace prizes to longest standing war time presidents.

Politifact is reliable.... to upholding the entrenched bias of progressive politics.

And exactly what is your source for this, and please post information to show that it's reliable? If you can't do this, then all you are doing is equating your opinion as if it were fact.

 

[Smart_Guy]

This thread is funny

 

[SkepticThinker]

Well cuz i know Trump wont jeapardize his business for some Farmers!!
He will cool down his anger when he wins

What makes you think he will cool down his anger when he wins? I don't foresee that happening.

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

What makes you think he will cool down his anger when he wins? I don't foresee that happening.

Because to introduce discriminatory rules he must find a way to abolish US constitution or to modify it.

Also he doesnt want to lose business in muslim world.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Because to introduce discriminatory rules he must find a way to abolish US constitution or to modify it.

Also he doesnt want to lose business in muslim world.

I don't think he'll just change his personality overnight. But ... ok.

 

[Acim]

And exactly what is your source for this, and please post information to show that it's reliable? If you can't do this, then all you are doing is equating your opinion as if it were fact.

I thought I posted about politifact's bias (reliable toward upholding LW bias), but alas it was in another thread. So, I'll repost here, because it really can't be said enough.

Who’s Checking the Fact Checkers?
PolitiFact bias: Does the GOP tell nine times more lies than left? Really?
Is Politifact truly neutral?
Mailbag: 'Your bias is apparent'

These from p.1 of simple google search. Not including the obvious one: politifactbias.com

 

[jeager106]

Hidabeast is ethically challenged.
How's that for being politically correct?

Thanks revoltingest!

 

[Revoltingest]

Hidabeast is ethically challenged.
How's that for being politically correct?

Thanks revoltingest!

Aye, we should all strive to describe our candidates in fair & objective terms.
Even though I plan to vote for the orange poopy head, I should treat Hilda with civility.

 

[jeager106]

Aye, we should all strive to describe our candidates in fair & objective terms.
Even though I plan to vote for the orange poopy head, I should treat Hilda with civility.

Yes. Even I treat all criminals with civility.
Hildabeast Hildabeast Hildabeast Hildabeast Hildabeast na, nana, na, naaaaa.

 

[Revoltingest]

Yes. Even I treat all criminals with civility.
Hildabeast Hildabeast Hildabeast Hildabeast Hildabeast na, nana, na, naaaaa.

Funny names are (of course) meant in friendship....or at least mirthful tolerance.

 

[metis]

I thought I posted about politifact's bias (reliable toward upholding LW bias), but alas it was in another thread. So, I'll repost here, because it really can't be said enough.

Who’s Checking the Fact Checkers?
PolitiFact bias: Does the GOP tell nine times more lies than left? Really?
Is Politifact truly neutral?
Mailbag: 'Your bias is apparent'

These from p.1 of simple google search. Not including the obvious one: politifactbias.com

I went through each site, and let me just repeat that you have not proven one thing since the only thing one should derive from them is that one simply cannot blindly take any source as being "gospel", which I certainly do not do nor support in my posts. I do believe we pretty much all know that, Acim. But what you have done is to take it to an absurd extreme that any fact-checking sources, including Politifact, are somehow making black white and white black.

Even if one were to totally disregard Politifact, common sense should tell them that the Donald has a great proficiency when it comes to bigoted statements and lying, which has also been mentioned by even many members of his own party. What I have a hard time understanding is why anyone would justify what he says in those regards. I would suggest that morally-inclined people should never support bigoted, demeaning, and dishonest statements coming from Trump, Hillary, or anyone else.

 

[Acim]

I went through each site, and let me just repeat that you have not proven one thing since the only thing one should derive from them is that one simply cannot blindly take any source as being "gospel", which I certainly do not do nor support in my posts. I do believe we pretty much all know that, Acim. But what you have done is to take it to an absurd extreme that any fact-checking sources, including Politifact, are somehow making black white and white black.

Whateva.

Even if one were to totally disregard Politifact, common sense should tell them that the Donald has a great proficiency when it comes to bigoted statements and lying, which has also been mentioned by even many members of his own party. What I have a hard time understanding is why anyone would justify what he says in those regards. I would suggest that morally-inclined people should never support bigoted, demeaning, and dishonest statements coming from Trump, Hillary, or anyone else.

My common sense, and considerable research and intellectual honestly doesn't tell me Donald has a "great proficiency when it comes to bigoted statements and lying." I feel he lies around one third the time as Hillary and she does it / has done it while in position where her so called 'experience' is now what matters to some. I'm honestly at point with Hillary where I don't know when she's being honest, and of the opinion she doesn't even know anymore.

 

[metis]

Whateva.



My common sense, and considerable research and intellectual honestly doesn't tell me Donald has a "great proficiency when it comes to bigoted statements and lying." I feel he lies around one third the time as Hillary and she does it / has done it while in position where her so called 'experience' is now what matters to some. I'm honestly at point with Hillary where I don't know when she's being honest, and of the opinion she doesn't even know anymore.

Another "false equivalency", and I say this as one who certainly is not a Hillary fan and who also voted for Bernie in the primary. Heck, even McConnell praised her about four or so weeks ago.

 

[Acim]

Another "false equivalency",

What's the false equivalency?

Again, this tangent that we are on, started with me responding to quote that said: "Well, according to political, trump is far more dishonest."