Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well, in this case Mexican, Central and South Americans.God damn it, death to America indeed.
Good comparison.It's like the people who exposed needle-exchange programs, and would bust folks who ran them for illegal distribution of hypoderminc needles. Those who are attempting to save the lives of the unfortunate should not be singled out for persecution or prosecution.
Meh. Personally, I would prefer the border patrol, et al, simply to stake out the dropped off water and ambush anyone who comes for it. Let them drink, and then politely escort them back where they came from.
American policy and laws have always been more concerned with symbolism than pragmatism.
Good comparison.
Even if someone opposes legalization of drugs and/or supports harsh anti-drug laws, there's no logical reason to block the distribution of clean safe needles to prevent disease. The issues are independent of each other. Same with providing water to immigrants- whatever someone's opinion of illegal immigration it's a serparate thing from giving water to a thirsty person, or giving a person water simply to save their lives even if what they're doing you consider criminal.
Does anybody know what the penalties are for facilitating illegal border crossings?
And why would you want to do that?Not providing water enforces the idea that crossing the border illegally is wrong.
So not a felony then?Short time in prison.
And why would you want to do that?
It is a felony.So not a felony then?
The following statements are true.
1. You should not enter a country illegally
2. You should not encourage such activity
3. You should not punish someone for doing so, simple return the bottles to the owner.
This topic is stupid.
If they weren't trying to cross the border illegally, they wouldn't be in a situation where they needed water to save their lives.
If they brought their own water, they wouldn't be in a situation where they needed someone else to provide water to save their lives.
Not providing water enforces the idea that crossing the border illegally is wrong. It is a risk that a person takes, and that person should be willing to suffer the consequences of taking a risk they knew would be dangerous.
It is a risk that a person takes, and that person should be willing to suffer the consequences of taking a risk they knew would be dangerous.